RE: Mercedes-AMG GT 63 4-door | PH Carbituary
RE: Mercedes-AMG GT 63 4-door | PH Carbituary
Wednesday 31st December 2025

Mercedes-AMG GT 63 4-door | PH Carbituary

Orders are closed for the enigmatic GT - time to pay tribute to a lesser spotted AMG hero...


We’ve all seen a few Mercedes-AMG spin-offs in recent years and wondered what the point was. An SUV most likely, though there have been some oddball saloons and coupes also. They appear so niche that only a few will surely ever want them, making it hard to believe that the money spent in development will ever be recouped in sales. Or that the halo effect will ever be pronounced enough to help the rest of the lineup. Probably we’ll miss a sprawling range when it’s all reduced to a pair of powertrains supplying every bodystyle. 

The AMG GT 4-door will most certainly be missed, even if at launch in 2018 it definitely looked like one of those impossible-to-justify Affalterbach passion projects. The ‘213 AMG E63 of the era was already superb, with the 4.0-litre M177 V8 and 4Matic+ all-wheel drive. Here was another AMG luxury car with barely any more power that cost a lot more money and could only seat four - while attempting to claim tangible sports car lineage at more than two tonnes. On the face of it, the GT 4-door appeared a cynical way to make money from gullible customers, trying to sell a jazzed-up E63 as a sports car for a healthy markup. 

Then we drove it, and the 4-door emphatically proved why cars aren’t to be judged solely by the numbers. And why the hunches of journalists shouldn’t be relied upon. It was, and very definitely still is, a very special AMG experience. And patently not a misnomer: there was a purpose and aggression to the way it drove, thanks to a reinforced chassis, unique suspension tune and four-wheel steering, that meant it really did feel like an XL GT to a large extent. That V8 wasn’t just a bit more potent than the saloon, either, as there was a chunk more torque as well: 664lb ft, compared to 627 for a ‘63, so every twinge of the throttle was met with more muscle, and it romped through its nine gears even more ravenously. 

And if intangible alongside, there was a sense of occasion to the 4-door that eluded the humble (by comparison) E63. The interior felt like an upgrade, with its rich materials and the V8-style arrangement for the transmission tunnel switches. As a static object, the GT exuded palpable menace while an E-Class blended into the background. As Nic C put it on his first experience: ‘In the flesh, the GT 63 radiates roughly the sort of physical vibe you’d expect from a ballroom full of bare-chested yakuza. Pictures don’t seem to do it justice, and it’s vanishingly rare to actually see one, so you must trust us when we say that no other car currently on sale conveys malevolence quite so successfully’. Years later, the statement most certainly rings true; an M5 is bloated by comparison, a Panamera plain. 

The GT was Mercedes-AMG at its unnecessary yet compelling best: in much the same way that nobody ever needed 7.3-litre SLs or twin-turbo G-Classes, the 4-door was surplus to all but the most niche of requirements - yet totally irresistible as well. To experience it was to want it, and rationality be damned.

At the UK launch in Aberdeen almost seven years ago, it was almighty through the Cairngorms National Park, shrinking straights with that stellar V8 and cornering with an uncanny precision. Thanks to the feedback of its major controls and uniquely AMG interpretation of all-wheel drive, it made an Audi RS7 feel about as exciting as an A5 TDI. It was an obvious entrant into our group test of the best four-wheel drive cars on sale. Wherever the GT 4-door ended up, it gave a formidably good account of itself. You’d never forget a drive in a hurry, put it that way.

Come 2021, the Mercedes-AMG E-Class was revised and improved, with comfier suspension and a keener front end. To ensure the GT could still claim its flagship status, the 4-door was also updated - with another 200hp. The 63 S E Performance is the ultimate representation of the irrepressible GT vibe; nobody would have driven a 639hp original and craved anything more whatsoever. 

Yet to experience the way the electric fills in the turbo lag, bulks up the 4.0-litre mid-range to obscene levels and then silently skulks through town centres like a four-wheeled basking shark, is to be captivated all over again. It’s a PHEV with attitude, celebrating its electrification (including a two-speed transmission for the motor) with a cacophony of sounds and sensations as well as truly outrageous performance. Nobody needs a 2,380kg, 196mph car with seven miles of electric range - you might even say that nobody really wants one - but the AMG still presents an enormously persuasive case. 

Because it wants driving, too, not merely experiencing. There’s some resistance and weight to the steering (to say nothing of its accuracy), the 4Matic leans very heavily on one axle, and there’s proper discipline to the body control in the suspension’s sterner settings. All while ensconced in a feast of leather, carbon and Air Balance perfume, with ambient lighting swanky enough to shame a Soho Farmhouse. It shouldn’t make sense, a car as luxurious as it is thrilling to drive, but the 4-door pulls it off magnificently. And, crucially, in a fashion that nothing else really has: a Panamera is less bombastic than Affalterbach’s maverick, the much-loved old Aston Martin Rapide nowhere near as capable. 

It’s some way from a perfect Mercedes, sure. While eminently tolerable and supremely disciplined, the GT’s ride isn’t what you’d call pliant in any scenario; those secondary intrusions that a less focused Benz would absorb don’t go unnoticed. That small 6.1kWh battery pack somehow robs the boot of an inordinate amount of space, while the car itself still struggles to muster much more than 20mpg. And it must be said that newer AWD systems, such as the one found in the BMW M3, now feel a bit smarter, metering out the requirements of each axle more smoothly and swiftly. Oh yes, and as you see it here, this Olive Metallic example is £190k.

Nevertheless, the GT 4-door departs as a reminder that nobody does heartthrob ‘bahnstormers quite like AMG. It’s a Hammer for the modern age: wildly expensive, monstrously powerful, fabulously opulent, appealing only to the select few - and deeply, deeply cool as a result. If the idea of such a machine appeals, the reality is utterly absorbing. Flawed, most certainly, yet charming in a fashion that very few cars are. Whatever comes next for Mercedes-branded performance cars, regardless of powertrain, bodystyle or remit, cars that can channel the style, swagger and substance of the 4-door GT will be pretty damn good. It would be a fitting legacy for a car as unapologetically, unforgettably AMG as this.  


SPECIFICATION | MERCEDES-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE

Engine: 3,982cc twin-turbo V8, rear-mounted electric motor, 6.1kWh battery
Transmission: 9-speed DCT, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 843 (639 @ 5,500-6,500rpm)
Torque (lb ft): 1,084 (664 @ 2,500-4,500rpm)
0-62mph: 2.9sec
Top speed: 196mph
Weight: 2,380kg
MPG: 25.2 (WLTP, up to 7 miles all-electric range)
CO2: 298g/km (WLTP)
Price: £182,450 (price as standard; price as tested £189,450, comprising Manufaktur Exclusive Olive Metallic paint for £1,700, Manufaktur Exclusive Nappa leather - Saddle Brown/Black for £3,200, Driving Assistance Package for £2,100)

Author
Discussion

pycraft

Original Poster:

1,221 posts

205 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Such a shame this is going. It's a popular car in Abu Dhabi - you don't see them every week, but you do see them more often than anything with two doors and a comparable price tag. The loss of this and the CLS (same platform, also very popular here) and the impending loss of the RS7 and 8GC in 2026 means we are losing the "four door coupes" (before someone kicks off, "coupe" means "cut" and equally refers to height as number of doors, see 1960s Rover P5B for details). Instead we're supposed to fall for the new M5, which feels like it towers over my previous-generation 5-series at the lights. By the end of 2026, there'll only be the Panamera left, which is terrible; the whole point of these cars is to not make them ugly.

I assume that all of this is because of the need to put batteries under the floor of next-generation variants, meaning everything looks about six inches taller than it needs to be. Jag's "our new saloon is lower than the F-Type" shows it can be done. At this rate, when it comes to market, it'll be the only properly low saloon that isn't a Porsche. Which is, I suppose, almost where we were in the 90s.

Edited by pycraft on Wednesday 31st December 05:08

Jaybee1981

61 posts

140 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Lovely cars.
A LOT of the these in abu dhabi seem to be Japanese imports from what i've seen and who i've spoke to anecdotally.
They must have been a bargain in japan.

scenario8

7,516 posts

200 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Glad you guys see them regularly in the Middle East. I mused on a previous thread x years ago about their popularity in the UK and whether the exercise was “worth it” to Mercedes. Despite living in London (where one might be forgiven for thinking chances were higher than for the vast majority of the rest of the UK) I’ve still only knowingly seen one.


cerb4.5lee

40,533 posts

201 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
I've always liked these(especially the engine), and I always used to see one local to me. I wouldn't say no to one as a family car to be honest.

scenario8

7,516 posts

200 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
At £180 grand, Lee?

Can t help thinking it s a tough sell. Which appears to have been the case.

Out of curiosity I just perused Autocar, and while it is possible I wasn t doing it correctly (although I tried various parameters) I could only find a single example for sale. From any year and of any variant.

Edit - I was doing it incorrectly! I can choose from 24. Take it all back. Well, a bit.

Edited by scenario8 on Wednesday 31st December 09:18

themule

139 posts

96 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
I didn't realise these existed until I read this, but it's a good looking car.

GT9

8,388 posts

193 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
I've always liked these(especially the engine), and I always used to see one local to me. I wouldn't say no to one as a family car to be honest.
Please don’t Lee, I’m not sure we can cope with the thousands of posts going on about the 2.4 ton weight. smile

cerb4.5lee

40,533 posts

201 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
scenario8 said:
At £180 grand, Lee?

Can t help thinking it s a tough sell. Which appears to have been the case.
Yes, and that's a good point. I just like them for the hatchback, and they look quite roomy in general that's all. Plus finding a £180k isn't easy as you say for sure.

Slowlygettingit

843 posts

62 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
I used to work for a small but profitable firm where two absolutely useless directors who owned a lot of shares back from when it was a start up used to have car based Willy waving contests.
One was a BM guy, the other Merc guy.
The mercophile clearly won by buying one of these as the bm guy traded a lovely m5 in for an x5m thing. An act of surrender in my eyes.

Sounded great but tbh the looks didn’t do it for me. At the time I had an e300d estste and thought an e63 estate would’ve been the nuts apart from my 30000 mile fuel bill.

Still toy with getting a gt coupe though….

andy43

12,351 posts

275 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Like these a lot. Early ones are 60k now, and a few were specced with a proper rear bench that seats 3 which I think is a massive plus.
Some fully optioned cars are even as well kitted out as my Kia Stinger was - heads up display, cooled seats, pan roof.
Boot lip is too high to be practical, plus a lot were ordered in daft matt paint. Still would.

DMZ

1,969 posts

181 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
It’s an incredibly purposeful looking car. I couldn’t believe how good looking it is in the metal the first time I saw one as it looks totally generic in photos.

I had the pleasure of chasing one earlier in the year at proper speeds and they don’t hang about. Handled very well for a 2,000kg car.

Maccmike8

1,484 posts

75 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Seems so out of proportion. The design just doesn't work imo.

Affalterbacher

106 posts

111 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Stunning things with a stunning price.

Is a well-specced M6 Gran Coupe the cut-price (used) alternative?

CMTMB

426 posts

16 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
I like that a lot. I think it might annoy me when I got in a 9 year old E200d taxi to find the same dashboard, but I'm sure I'd get over it. biggrin

bigmowley

2,436 posts

197 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
andy43 said:
Like these a lot. Early ones are 60k now, and a few were specced with a proper rear bench that seats 3 which I think is a massive plus.
Some fully optioned cars are even as well kitted out as my Kia Stinger was - heads up display, cooled seats, pan roof.
Boot lip is too high to be practical, plus a lot were ordered in daft matt paint. Still would.
I’ve got one that comes in for storage from time to time in that simply dreadful matt black finish. I was surprised to find it has a lithium battery, obviously a vitally important bit of weight saving in an over 2 ton coupe. They are a big old bus with reverse tardis amounts of interior space. I have dropped it back up to the client a few times and they do drive nicely, they shrink around you quite a bit. For me it’s far too generic AMG Mercedes for the money. When it’s parked up next to the lovely Black C63 we look after they are surprisingly difficult to differentiate at a glance. It’s also on Hankook tyres which was a surprise but OE apparently. A flat no from me.

Captain Smerc

3,248 posts

137 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Oh Lord won't you buy me a Mercedes-Benz ...

NGK210

4,407 posts

166 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Lovely in theory, not so much in practice.
Checkout PH’s UBG, for example:

[i]”Engine issues can be expensive to work on…
Another US M177 owner said the M-B dealer replaced his engine twice under warranty at a reported price of £63,000 per engine. Labour costs were on top of that.”[/i]
https://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-buying-guides/...
eek

EDIT:
FFS, PH, kindly sort out your site’s formatting issues #inept

Edited by NGK210 on Wednesday 31st December 11:50

whp1983

1,287 posts

160 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
Comparing to an RS7 is a bit stiff, almost twice the price…. Like saying a Range Rover really puts an X5 in its place…. Well yes!

Still look at these as an ugly waste of time but owners seem to love them

Angelo1985

657 posts

47 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
I don’t get why they needed this car in the range when they had the CLS. The sales figures seem to prove my point.
I think Mercedes needs to rein in AMG. They are moving from “classy cars” to “chavvy cars” in a couple of generations.

theicemario

1,478 posts

96 months

Wednesday 31st December 2025
quotequote all
pycraft said:
I assume that all of this is because of the need to put batteries under the floor of next-generation variants, meaning everything looks about six inches taller than it needs to be. Jag's "our new saloon is lower than the F-Type" shows it can be done.
And yet Taycan is over 40 mm lower than Panamera