RE: Truly exceptional Rover 200 BRM for sale
RE: Truly exceptional Rover 200 BRM for sale
Today

Truly exceptional Rover 200 BRM for sale

A pre-production press car turned mollycoddled minter - there won't be many better Rovers left than this


While the MG ZR is the famous Rover 200-shaped hot hatch, it wasn’t the first of its kind. During the '90s, before the 200 became the 25, Rover dabbled with performance variants. The first was the 200vi, taking the VVC version of the 1.8 K Series used in the Lotus Elise 111S - and then there was the car you see here: the Rover 200 BRM. Yes, it’s a real one, there are still some around, and what a brilliant bit of nostalgia it now looks. 

Using motorsport to make an ordinary car seem more glamorous is one of the oldest tricks in the automotive marketing book; using a historic livery, as the 200 did with its British Racing Green and orange grille surround, is usually the most important part of the overhaul. But while many were cynical about just what Rover was trying to achieve with the BRM, there were some meaningful changes incorporated, including a limited-slip diff, revised suspension and a new final drive ratio. It was to be a quicker, keener car than the already impressive 200vi. 

But there was an issue. A couple of issues, in fact. The BRM was initially sold as an £18,000 car, thousands more than a vi had cost and more even than cars like the Peugeot 306 GTI-6. Remember that when the Honda Civic Type R came along early in the 21st century, it was £15,995? The BRM was simply too much money, and only when it was reduced to £13,495 did the bulk of the 797 sales in Britain happen. By then, though, the media had had its say; the BRM’s reputation was cast as an overpriced marketing exercise. Rover learned its lesson: when the ZR turned up, expensive hardware like the diff was binned in favour of big spoilers and bargain pricing. It worked: the ZR was much more of a commercial success than the 200s were. But if anything, it serves to make the BRM story even more interesting, a tale of what might have been had it launched at a lower price or looked slightly different. 

This BRM is actually one of the pre-production examples that was reviewed by the press, featuring in Autocar and Car magazine with both its original S959 WOM reg or the R200 BRM press plate that it retains to this day. Having been thoroughly run in by Britain’s finest car journalists for the first year of its life, this BRM was bought in October 1999 by its first public owner - for £12k, with a 100 GTA taken in part exchange. He then used it for a few years, before it was garaged in 2002. 

Presumably very little happened then for a while, being sold to just its third owner in 2020 and receiving its first digital MOT in 2021 at 19,000 miles. Since then, it’s been used sparingly, now showing just over 21,000 miles and with every single bit looking like it’s time-travelled straight from 1998. The orange gleams, the quilting is stitch-perfect, those wheels as handsome as ever. It must be the very best example left, complete with a recent head gasket just to be sure…

What happens next is hard to say with much certainty. Probably this should go to an ardent MG Rover fan, one who can appreciate its freshly recommissioned condition and pamper it appropriately. But regular use would surely be too tempting to resist; think how much fun it would be, and how many days would be made, driving a Rover 200 BRM every other week or so. While £15k is the most we’ve ever seen one at (more than that eventual new price, even), it pales against the prices asked for better-known pocket rockets. None of which would guarantee any more love and attention from passers-by than humble Rover. 


SPECIFICATION | ROVER 200 BRM

Engine: 1,796cc, four-cyl
Transmission: 5-speed manual, front-wheel drive, limited-slip diff
Power (hp): 145@6,750rpm
Torque (lb ft): 128@4,000rpm
MPG: 36
CO2: N/A
Year registered: 1999
Recorded mileage: 38,000
Price new: £18,000
Yours for: £14,995

See the original advert

Author
Discussion

markh450

Original Poster:

114 posts

232 months

Remember looking at one of these and trying to justify it, back in the day 150hp hatch seemed a lot! I remember quite a few from new had the orange grill painted silver to ‘tone’ them down.

Simon Lee 100

28 posts

129 months

Interesting car, but that interior would take some getting used to. Pricing seems reasonable for what is on offer.

el romeral

1,863 posts

158 months

Still not liking that orange lower grille. Great looking example though and the interior looks lush.

Bright Halo

3,734 posts

256 months

I think these are a bit of time warp magic.
It shows it is all about the mkting. 150hp and a lsd we’re very good for the time. That interior was probably too over the top in its day. Is this the car that the journo’s of the day said it was “like sitting in an abattoir” ?

I love it!

heisthegaffer

4,012 posts

219 months

Famtatstic. Very underrated.

Jon_S_Rally

4,183 posts

109 months

I'm sure plenty on here will hate it, but I think that's lovely. I remember them coming out and thinking they looked great. A shame they didn't carry the larger wheels and front splitter over from the concept, but still a decent looking car. The orange is a bit in-your-face, but I think that's part of the charm of it, just like the interior.

The problem with this one is that it's almost too nice to use, but I bet it would be a lot of fun to take out for a spin now and again. Nippy enough to be fun, but slow enough to enjoy without looking like a total pillock.

I really must try and find a '90s hot hatch of this ilk to add to the fleet. Just a shame the prices are now so keen for most of them.

s m

24,083 posts

224 months

Never driven one of these but I did try the equally quick 200vi ( no Torsen diff though ) with a view to buying. Couldn’t quite find an ideal one but they are certainly rapid once warmed up
Better than 306Gti-6 performance and left the Alfa Cloverleaf and RS2000 in its wake in a triple test

Turbobanana

7,692 posts

222 months

PH Thread Hitlist:

- Divisive colour scheme - check
- Know purveyor of expensive but best-in-class classics - check
- Photographed against a white background - check
- Made in limited numbers, perceived (by vendors) to add value - check
- Almost too good to use? - check
- It's a Rover - check

What have I missed?


itcaptainslow

4,404 posts

157 months

Considering my identical car ( Reader's Car of the Week thread) sold on Collecting Cars a couple of years ago for half this amount (which was considered in the community a decent result!), I do think the dealer is being somewhat optimistic with their pricing...and that's coming from a Rover pervert!

I've got the 200Vi non-porn dungeon version now; they're both more than the sum of their parts. It makes 143bhp feel pretty lusty, and it flows down the road beautifully. I would of course say I prefer the Vi (for a number of reasons, least of all nostalgia, as my parents had one) but the larger, wider wheels and diff of the BRM do introduce a level of unruliness and tramlining the Vi doesn't experience.

GreatScott2016

2,154 posts

109 months

On the spec summary, recorded mileage shows as 38,000? Probably a typo as 21,000 shown elsewhere. Either way, lovely looking example but I was a bit shocked to see the interior colour yikes I do however love the simplicity of interior layouts of this era, lovely smile

WPA

13,174 posts

135 months

Turbobanana said:
PH Thread Hitlist:

- Divisive colour scheme - check
- Know purveyor of expensive but best-in-class classics - check
- Photographed against a white background - check
- Made in limited numbers, perceived (by vendors) to add value - check
- Almost too good to use? - check
- It's a Rover - check

What have I missed?
Lets be honest, I doubt they paid more than £4k for it

Pricewise it is crazy money for something that was not really loved when new, colour scheme is awful

Does being a pre production car add anything, hammered by various testers new


Sporky

9,883 posts

85 months

On first glance I thought "weren't these all green?"

Terrible photos.

GianiCakes

564 posts

94 months

I seem to recall these were described as looking like a Pig wearing lipstick when new, which is harsh but hard to unsee.
I’m not sure which engine version of these I drove when new (I had a 420si) but I do remember it being a fun and enjoyable steer. Never enough to motivate me to buy one 30 years later though.

macron

12,543 posts

187 months

Is 38k really that low to merit this lind of money? 3.8 yes, this seems like someone who just pottered.

Some weirdo-done-good whose dad drank tea at Longbridge might buy it, but surely the market for this is remarkably small.

Taz73

351 posts

33 months

What a great little car, 200’s were great to drive in standard specs, so this must have been, and still be, huge fun.
I too remember reviews being positive about everything at the price. The 200, iirc, was always a bit pricey, priced to compete with larger hatches like the civic golf etc but was a fair bit smaller.
Can’t decide if the price is good or not, but if I had the money I would certainly be tempted to throw in an offer of £10k or so and see where they stand.
Lovely little thing.

CH80

305 posts

18 months

What is exceptional about this car? The fact they made so few because no one was interested in it, and because it was nothing exceptional to begin with?

Cryssys

757 posts

59 months

I just can't see anything other than that grille.

God it's hideous.

Miles Remmington

16 posts

153 months

I remember looking into these when I was a teenager and a good one was about 2 grand - seemed an easy way into low-level hot hatchery and a step up from 45 1.4 Club.

Clearly there's some people who appreciate them more, but at this money I would be a lot less keen, even as a bit of a longship fancier. If I was going to get an old warm Rover hatchback I'd much sooner have a Metro Gti, I think.

Inline5

31 posts

63 months

Never has the “you can’t polish a turd,but you can roll it in glitter” been more apt! What an absolutely repulsive bit of kit! Nostalgia gone mad,always was & always will be a piece of crap 💩

Deep Thought

38,323 posts

218 months

Despite the usual Rover comments of "these were crap" and "of course, i remember the time when you could buy one of these for 50p" comments, these were great little cars and underrated at the time.

They are now - rightly so IMHO - gaining a bit of a cult status.