RE: 2026 Mercedes-AMG GT 63 Pro | UK Review
RE: 2026 Mercedes-AMG GT 63 Pro | UK Review
Yesterday

2026 Mercedes-AMG GT 63 Pro | UK Review

Slightly fruitier version of Mercedes-AMG's burly coupe gets 612hp - is it sufficient to finally turn heads?


For those not keeping track, it has been nearly two years since we first drove the Mercedes-AMG GT 63 in the UK. While any period of time prior to President Trump’s second term tends to seem like a long time ago, we can at least reflect upon the fact that 20-odd months is a significant chunk out of any model’s lifecycle - especially when we suggested at the time that the best was very likely yet to come from car that could claim the right constituent parts, though not necessarily in ideal or cohesive quantity. 

Its maker, of course, never one to miss a trick when there is a colossal parts bin to delve into, has busied itself in the interim. British customers can now ponder the four-cylinder GT 43 and (detuned) eight-cylinder GT55 before they even arrive at the number ’63’ on Mercedes’ configurator. Which, broadly speaking, is a good thing: perhaps the AMG GT has not endeared itself to buyers sufficiently well for us to be inundated with sightings - nevertheless, the option of a handsome 2+2 coupe in an array of flavours, all of them petrol-based, is a fact worth cheering. 

Granted, the eight-model lineup kicks off at a decidedly chunky £105k and gets wildly more optimistic as the cylinder count rises, but let’s not get immediately bogged down with that. The wider point is that we approve of and appreciate the Mercedes-AMG GT in pretty much all formats - even, it must be said, the super-silly, 816hp S E Performance, another outrageously fast, V8-engined car that wears its hybrid system like a powerlifter might wear a t-shirt touting spinach as performance-enhancing. 

This reflex to iterate is certainly understandable if your primary competition is the Porsche 911, a sports car that credibly spans everything from pseudo-GT to actual GT3. So much so that we’re even prepared to forgive the year or so it has taken Mercedes to transition this car, the new GT 63 Pro, from one-time Ascari plaything to legitimate right-hand-drive model available to drive on the road in the UK. (A time period so bafflingly long that Porsche conspired to successfully launch yet another update of its ‘ring conqueror right in the middle of it.) 

Probably it helps, somewhat counterintuitively, that the Pro is not a genuine, rose-jointed effort to rival the circuit-based prowess of the GT3 - that GT will surely arrive eventually, yet despite its new, air-gulping front end and chequered flag fixation, this is not it. Instead, the newcomer represents a more moderate turn on the performance dial, chiefly concerned with improved aero, superior braking and the benefits associated with choosing Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2R tyres (a no-cost option) to adorn your 21-inch forged alloys. 

There is more power, too, though in the context of AMG’s usually insatiable lust for output, finding an additional 20hp from its familiar 4.0-litre unit ought not to be considered revelatory. Though, it must be said, once you’ve absorbed the Pro’s slightly beefier new appearance (its toothier grin is an improvement, I think), it is the husky presence of the V8 which helps set the tone. Admittedly, it has been a long time since I drove the GT 63 - or perhaps I’m conflating a much clearer memory of the hybrid - but I can’t recall it being quite so vocal in its default setting. 

Either way, there’s a lot to be said for a flinty snarl in 2026 (especially driven back-to-back with the initially clamorous Temerario); doubly so when the turbocharged engine and its nine-speed MCT provide the sound with instant heft and nuance, not to mention the sort of oily, combustible wallop that has you pushing at the accelerator like a moth head butting a light bulb. For the record, there is now 627lb ft of torque available from 2,350rpm, although you hardly need to be in the sweet spot to enjoy the Pro-spec V8. It’s a party animal. 

For the most part, foregrounding the motor is a convenient way of ushering you through an already open door. It was a little too easy in the GT 63 (and the even heavier hybrid) to just sit back and appreciate the canny control weights from a measured distance; the Pro encourages you deeper into the car’s mosh pit, where you might not always be blown away with everything that’s going on - again, this is not a GT3 by any stretch of the imagination - but you’re taking away so much more from the overall experience regardless.

It’s a fair bet, positioning-wise, that this is the whole point: AMG might have started actively cooling the diffs and reduced lift on the front axle by 30kg and fitted the largest ceramic disc brakes available to it for measurable gains on circuit, yet on the road the Pro just seems a bit more receptive to being taken by the scruff of the neck. And really that’s all you ever needed to do, consistently and with greater intent, for the GT’s already established strengths to bubble to the surface. 

In this regard, presumably the reduction in unsprung mass versus its stablemates is doing the Pro a number of favours - certainly it seemed slightly more deft in terms of ride quality, making the firmer settings in Sport the drive mode of choice beyond a town or motorway. And while it’s still true that you never lose sight of the GT’s near two-tonne kerbweight - or its tendency to seem physically large on minor UK roads - neither drawback is significant enough to limit one's enjoyment. 

At any rate, the salient point to (re)make here is that the GT 63 did not require a top-to-bottom tweak to get it to this point - it was already pretty good. But if Mercedes was previously guilty of making its sports car a bit too GT-ish (in the touring sense), the Pro does just enough to nudge the model, and its driver’s mindset, into the sort of high-functioning groove where many more of us might conceivably get a kick out of it. That the kick is adjudged to be worth £179,350 before you get to options might induce familiar groans from the gallery, though it’s worth noting that it represents a £20k saving over the new 911 Turbo S. Hardly a decisive advantage, given Porsche’s 711hp wunderkind. But food for thought.


SPECIFICATION | 2025 Mercedes-AMG GT 63 Pro 4Matic+

Engine: 3,982cc, V8, twin-turbo
Transmission: nine-speed auto, four-wheel drive
Power (hp): 612@5,500-6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 627@2,350-5,000rpm
0-62mph: 3.2secs
Top speed: 197mph
Weight: 1,962kg (EU) 
MPG: 20.2 (WLTP)
CO2: 319g/km (WLTP)
Price: £179,350

Author
Discussion

BigR

Original Poster:

441 posts

184 months

Yesterday (13:13)
quotequote all
That screen with all the hidden functions... pretty much the reason I won't buy a Merc these days - have tried it and loathed it on an SL. Oh that and a terrible dealer experience, not that they're necessarily unique in that respect!

leglessAlex

6,676 posts

163 months

Yesterday (13:25)
quotequote all
Obviously they're clearly different side by side, I can't work out how they've managed to make this generation of GT so 911 looking?

It's nice to have a good alternative to said 911 in the sports coupe space.

Carl_VivaEspana

15,749 posts

284 months

Yesterday (13:35)
quotequote all

I think it looks nicer than a new 911.

Optioned I think its 22k GBP down and 2.2k per month plus fuel and insurance bills. I cant imagine the V8 being frugal. 3k per month to run?

ST3.14159265358979323846

266 posts

33 months

Yesterday (13:45)
quotequote all
MBUX is the only car system I've used rather than defaulting to automatically connecting to Android Auto or Carplay.

It's pretty straightforward, intuitive and the hybrid system works well with the navigation input.

KIA on the other hand, you think you've got the hang of it and they move stuff or release a new update for the app which moves information around. I've given up with that UX.

fflump

2,918 posts

60 months

Yesterday (13:55)
quotequote all
Current model is inferior to the initial design which had a nice long bonnet and sls looks. The new 911 facsimile less so.

Hereandthere

176 posts

71 months

Yesterday (14:01)
quotequote all
After buying numerous versions of the 911 and with my last car being a 2022 year Audi R8 performance edition, I decided to have a change and bought a 25 reg AMG GT 63 Ultimate edition that had covered 1300 miles and was 8 months old. I bought it from Mercedes Cambridge (a great experience by the way) for £147500 (RRP with VED was around £186K) and can't be happier. Perhaps it is because I haven't driven a front engined car for at least a decade (I like the heavy front-end feeling), perhaps it is because I actually have a boot that can carry a deal of luggage etc, perhaps because it feels more accelerative than the R8 (low down power due to the turbos obviously helps here) and perhaps because I think it looks a very handsome car, but I am really pleased with my purchase. That said, I do think the AMG GT 63 versions were well overpriced and am sure they would have sold loads more if the RRP was at least £40K less.

CG2020UK

2,834 posts

62 months

Yesterday (14:40)
quotequote all
Brilliant looking car!


Gruntled

178 posts

101 months

Yesterday (15:19)
quotequote all
Ferrari Roma has a comparable engine, 4L V8 twin turbo 620 hp, yet weighs 500 kg less. Same price point... why choose the Merc ?

nismo48

6,159 posts

229 months

Yesterday (15:30)
quotequote all
I guess loaded with options it's a £200k car. Nevertheless it is a cracking car.

Iamnotkloot

1,816 posts

169 months

Yesterday (15:37)
quotequote all
Gruntled said:
Ferrari Roma has a comparable engine, 4L V8 twin turbo 620 hp, yet weighs 500 kg less. Same price point... why choose the Merc ?
I guess people might prefer the looks of the Merc; however, I’m with you.

Owlwood

259 posts

178 months

Yesterday (15:49)
quotequote all
Cool looking cars. Also great to see it in a colour other than grey or black.

ManyMotors

994 posts

120 months

Yesterday (15:53)
quotequote all
Maybe only for MB freaks.

NGK210

4,487 posts

167 months

Yesterday (16:05)
quotequote all
If only there was a Merc-built coupe that doesn’t have a hideous centre console, weighs less than 1900kg, has an AMG V8, which is installed front-mid-mounted in a bespoke chassis.
And has used prices that’re an absolute steal.

CountyLines

4,207 posts

25 months

Yesterday (16:09)
quotequote all
Like the 4 cylinder C63, I've never seen one of these on the road. AMG seem to have lost their lustre.

MountainsofSussex

371 posts

208 months

Yesterday (17:38)
quotequote all
Iamnotkloot said:
Gruntled said:
Ferrari Roma has a comparable engine, 4L V8 twin turbo 620 hp, yet weighs 500 kg less. Same price point... why choose the Merc ?
I guess people might prefer the looks of the Merc; however, I m with you.
It does seem shocking when the same company that makes an A class or Vito is at close enough the same price and spec as a Ferrari. I'm assuming better residuals on the Ferrari would make up for it being £20k+ more expensive to buy? You'd have to be a little bit mad not to get a Ferrari (or Aston) if you could, surely?

ecs0set

2,502 posts

306 months

Yesterday (18:38)
quotequote all
CG2020UK said:
Brilliant looking car!
Is it though? It's not bad looking, but the detail on the rear light units is a bit... hmm; the integration between the outer parts of the front grill and the centre section is... ok; and the interior dash shot is from a... A-class?, E-class? - I mean I can tell it's not a Sprinter or a G-class but it's not shouting Ferrari rival.

I quite like previous versions of the AMG-GT but looks wise, I'd give this a B+

Plus it's referred to as a "Pro", which IMHO was naff when BMW started throwing it around in the mid 2010s and has not aged well. Apple get away with it, when applied to a car it sounds ste.

Edited by ecs0set on Monday 9th February 18:40

Escort3500

13,104 posts

167 months

Yesterday (18:40)
quotequote all
Looks OK…until you reach the front

epom

13,983 posts

183 months

Yesterday (18:58)
quotequote all
nismo48 said:
I guess loaded with options it's a £200k car. Nevertheless it is a cracking car.


Double it wink

Affalterbacher

130 posts

112 months

Yesterday (19:31)
quotequote all
Skipped the starter of word soup and headed straight for the main course of comments.

The key ingredients are all too much here for me - excessive weight, silly price, over-styled.

Maccmike8

1,517 posts

76 months

Yesterday (20:23)
quotequote all
Has always turned my head. Beautiful car.