Lord of the flies
Author
Discussion

JimmyConwayNW

Original Poster:

3,423 posts

147 months

BBC have brought Lord of the Flies onto the TV in a series.
Has anyone watched it? All available on iPlayer.

I can remember watching the original on TV, many many years ago in a caravan near Caernarfon on a bleak wet day in the summer holidays. Always stuck with me.

dukeboy749r

3,138 posts

232 months

I didn't enjoy the book (set in English as part of the course work and poured over for many weeks).

Very unsettling subject.

I thought about watching it last night and decided the book had been enough.

JimmyConwayNW

Original Poster:

3,423 posts

147 months

dukeboy749r said:
I didn't enjoy the book (set in English as part of the course work and poured over for many weeks).

Very unsettling subject.

I thought about watching it last night and decided the book had been enough.
I think I had to do to kill a mocking bird and always hated that book. As my posts may show I gave up on English at that point.

FourWheelDrift

91,723 posts

306 months

But what is the best Lord, the Lord of the Dance, of the Rings or of the Flies?

motco

17,287 posts

268 months

The first cinema version in black and white was - is - the only film I have ever seen that was as near as possible exactly verbatim with the book. The BBC version is being recorded on my PVR for binge viewing at some point. The intermediate TV version from 2000 has passed me by.

According to the DT critic preview of it before it was aired, the BBC have done a pretty good job of it. I really hope it's not like that execrable 'War Between the Land and the Sea' drivel.

Skyedriver

22,069 posts

304 months

Had the book for "O" level English Lang, 1969. We were taken to see the B&W film at one point. t was on with "The Wild Bunch"!

Can't recall much about it apart from Sticking Pigs! Actually don't think I remembered much about it at the time of the exam. Only one in my class to fail Eng Lang twice!

Vsix and Vtec

1,283 posts

40 months

I recall reading the book because of one of those "top 100" lists. My school years were too far after of the release to make the curriculum, so I had to make do with Robert Swindel's "Brother in the land" (a post-apocalypse story told from a younger pov) and Shakespeare's "The Tempest" for English Lit. Oddly, I really loved The Tempest, which forced study is usually not conducive to.

gl20

1,196 posts

171 months

Onto the actual program itself… watched the first episode last night. Worth seeing it for the child actor who plays Piggy. Not sure if he’s been in anything else, but he really is excellent.

zetec

4,976 posts

273 months

I'm surprised in this day and age that the fat kid can still be called Piggy!

miniman

29,182 posts

284 months

Warhavernet

729 posts

9 months

I did watch the 1963 film, didn't really care for it at all, just bad film-making, editing, overdubbed dialogue, god awful music. Strange choice of director, Brooks was immersed in thesps, Shakespeare and theatre, Ken Russell Dick Lester, or best of all, good old Stan Kubrick would have made a better fist of it.

motco

17,287 posts

268 months

zetec said:
I'm surprised in this day and age that the fat kid can still be called Piggy!
Is he wearing a fat suit or did they cast him by advertising for a fat kid but in some euphemistic terminology?

Landlubber

96 posts

71 months

I watched the first episode with a weird sense of foreshadowing, and it's every bit as bad as the book. Don't get me wrong, it's a wonderful piece of literature but it's dark, real dark. Shows how quickly things can spin out of control into a frenzy of cruelty, barbarism,totalitarianism and murder. It's not a jolly romp and the adaptation captures this perfectly. Won't be watching any more, no sirree Bob.

Escort3500

13,113 posts

167 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
Skyedriver said:
Had the book for "O" level English Lang, 1969. We were taken to see the B&W film at one point. t was on with "The Wild Bunch"!

Can't recall much about it apart from Sticking Pigs! Actually don't think I remembered much about it at the time of the exam. Only one in my class to fail Eng Lang twice!
Same O level year for me, only I passed first time nerd (I won’t mention my chemistry, physics and maths re-sits however wink)

Terminator X

19,378 posts

226 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
As others, read the book for O Level Eng Lit. Watched first episode last night, really good imho.

TX.

toasty

8,187 posts

242 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
My wife wanted this on so we started watching it while I was browsing my phone.

Halfway through the first episode, it gradually caught my attention.

The filmmaking, storytelling, casting and acting is all first rate.

Last episode planned for tonight.

UTH

11,575 posts

200 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Hmmmm, think I might need to give this a go.

I remember very little about the story despite being in the play at school!

I do like bleak films/shows.....

rlw

3,542 posts

259 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Escort3500 said:
Skyedriver said:
Had the book for "O" level English Lang, 1969. We were taken to see the B&W film at one point. t was on with "The Wild Bunch"!

Can't recall much about it apart from Sticking Pigs! Actually don't think I remembered much about it at the time of the exam. Only one in my class to fail Eng Lang twice!
Same O level year for me, only I passed first time nerd (I won t mention my chemistry, physics and maths re-sits however wink)
1969 me too - got both English exams first time and buggered up the rest. Couldn't wait to get away from school so no resits ever. That film has stuck with me ever since.

some bloke

1,493 posts

89 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
We read the book in English in the early 80s, and I saw the film a few years ago.
The first episode was great. Piggy is an amazing actor, as are they all so far.

Stealthracer

8,326 posts

200 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Stuck on Episode 2 at the moment. Finding the weird camera angles and bright colours a bit off putting, but will persevere.

Like the idea of centring each instalment on a different character.