How has your eyesight affected your watch purchasing?
How has your eyesight affected your watch purchasing?
Author
Discussion

Bob_Defly

Original Poster:

5,262 posts

253 months

Monday 9th February
quotequote all
I recently turned 50, and just like that, boom! My eyesight started to get crappy.

So I got my first pair of glasses, just for reading. Everywhere else my vision is fine. But I have noticed that I just can't see small details on things anymore without glasses. For some things I can just hold them further away and I can see just fine, for watch dials sometimes that doesn't help as they are small already.

AND (slightly off-topic but relevant) have you noticed that once you have looked at lots of close up pictures of a watch you intend to buy, it always seems much smaller in real life? hehe

Anyway my mate just got a new watch, was excited to show me. We met up for breakfast and he took it off his wrist. Now I've seen many shots of this watch and the dial detail is really nice. It was me that put him onto the brand and he bought one straight away, I was erring on buying one too. But as I looked at it (I don't take my glasses anywhere with me) I realised I couldn't make out the dial detail at all, no matter where I held it.

So now when looking at new watches I want to buy, I am 100% in favour of really legible dials. I doubt I'll buy another chrono after I sell one that I have, as I just can't see the subdials without glasses. Does your eyesight affect your watch choices too?

Portofino

5,070 posts

213 months

Monday 9th February
quotequote all
Exactly the same here Bob. Hit 50 & boom my eyes are going.

Some of my existing watches especially ones with a small date window, are pretty much illegible.

Last watch purchase was a Panerai which avoids this problem, & perhaps was sub consciously for this very reason….

Harris_I

3,290 posts

281 months

Monday 9th February
quotequote all
This one hit home! biggrin

I'm frequently disappointed when I view a watch in person and realise I'm struggling to see the sunburst brushing effect, or the concentric rings in the subdials. Now I have to tilt the silver hands on white dial watch so I can see the light glinting off it to guess the time...

My daily go-to has become an enormous Pelagos with matt black dial and white hands for maximum contrast. Great watch, mind. I just wish I could truly appreciate the snowflakes on a Grand Seiko dial.

In't middle age brilliant...

toon10

6,988 posts

179 months

Monday 9th February
quotequote all
I hear you. Well, sort of, my ears are going the same way as my eyes. I'm early 50's and in the last year, my eyesight has gone from occasionally needing glasses to round off edges in the distance to now, where I have to wear them to watch TV or play Call of Duty. From great eyesight to not being able to drive a car without them in less than 3 years.

I bought a Farer Banzare GMT Limited Edition a while back. It's a lovely looking watch with a nice red textured dial and wearable sizing in line with my changing tastes. Only 150 pieces made so ticks the exclusivity box. Trouble is, I'm thinking of selling it as I very rarely wear it. The date window is too small and hard to read and the dark blue GMT markers don't contrast against the dial very well. The time is legible but just not the complications.

Richard-390a0

3,221 posts

113 months

Monday 9th February
quotequote all
I hear you!!! Nice clear dial & hands on the advertising images. A bit of cheaper end summertime fun when out & about... Silver hands on a silver dial in bright sunlight err no idea of the time at all with the invisible hands ffs!


Cybertronian

1,545 posts

185 months

Monday 9th February
quotequote all
I'm only 42 and I've started to rely on reading glasses...

I used to have excellent up-close vision, but since hitting my 40s, I find my minimum focus distance is now around 6 inches from my face and growing further.

Hasn't yet started to affect enjoyment of my watch collection, but I've little doubt that my chronographs will be the first to become tricky. I see contrasty dive watches in my future!


Olivera

8,404 posts

261 months

Monday 9th February
quotequote all
Yes, seeing small complications (e.g. date window) is more challenging. Maybe the oft griped about Rolex date cyclops actually helps here?

Probably made worse by being in the UK where it's often dull/overcast.

WayOutWest

1,045 posts

80 months

Monday 9th February
quotequote all
It is certainly starting to yes, there is no way I can read any non-magnified date window now without glasses, and it does put you off overly busy or detailed dials that you can't properly appreciate without your reading specs. No Seiko Flightmaster for me now frown
I had really great eyesight prior to 50, but each year since it degrades. 42mm divers with massive blob indices seem increasingly appealling.

WayOutWest

1,045 posts

80 months

Monday 9th February
quotequote all
Cybertronian said:
I'm only 42 and I've started to rely on reading glasses...
I used to have excellent up-close vision, but since hitting my 40s, I find my minimum focus distance is now around 6 inches from my face and growing further.
Wait until it is 18 inches smile

Furbo

3,154 posts

54 months

Monday 9th February
quotequote all
Bob_Defly said:
I recently turned 50, and just like that, boom! My eyesight started to get crappy.

So I got my first pair of glasses, just for reading. Everywhere else my vision is fine. But I have noticed that I just can't see small details on things anymore without glasses. For some things I can just hold them further away and I can see just fine, for watch dials sometimes that doesn't help as they are small already.

AND (slightly off-topic but relevant) have you noticed that once you have looked at lots of close up pictures of a watch you intend to buy, it always seems much smaller in real life? hehe

Anyway my mate just got a new watch, was excited to show me. We met up for breakfast and he took it off his wrist. Now I've seen many shots of this watch and the dial detail is really nice. It was me that put him onto the brand and he bought one straight away, I was erring on buying one too. But as I looked at it (I don't take my glasses anywhere with me) I realised I couldn't make out the dial detail at all, no matter where I held it.

So now when looking at new watches I want to buy, I am 100% in favour of really legible dials. I doubt I'll buy another chrono after I sell one that I have, as I just can't see the subdials without glasses. Does your eyesight affect your watch choices too?
I had my eyes fixed and carried on using the same watches.

Bob_Defly

Original Poster:

5,262 posts

253 months

Monday 9th February
quotequote all
LOL, good to know I'm in good company! hehe

All the above is the same for me. No champagne or silver dials, I hate cyclops so no date, no subdials, easy to read at a glance. These are my main two in rotation and fit the bill perfectly. I also plan on picking up a pilot's watch this year too.


quarryman111

117 posts

188 months

Monday 9th February
quotequote all
It s all that time spent staring at phone/laptop/pc screens that does it! What used to hit us oldies in our 50/60 s due to natural ageing seems to have moved down a generation. Don’t struggle on with eye strain longer than necessary…get tested/wear correction glasses and enjoy a new lease of watch-admiration life!

Edited by quarryman111 on Monday 9th February 18:45

CSR Performance

229 posts

10 months

Monday 9th February
quotequote all
I only started wearing reading glasses for screen work last year but I've already ended up with this!!









To be fair, I was sent it to review so didn't actually pay for it!

SpanishTony

434 posts

147 months

Tuesday 10th February
quotequote all
Completely understand this, I needed glasses in my forties and decided to go for contact lenses, one of my better decisions.

catso

15,785 posts

289 months

Tuesday 10th February
quotequote all
Olivera said:
Yes, seeing small complications (e.g. date window) is more challenging. Maybe the oft griped about Rolex date cyclops actually helps here?
I hate the cyclops lens with a passion and don't/wouldn't have any watches with one.

That said, the date on my Wife's (small) Rolex would be very difficult for me to read in anything other than perfect lighting conditions if it didn't have one.

I'm also pretty certain she can't read it (even with the cyclops) because it never bothers her if it's wrong due to short month or not wearing it for a while.

Ninjin

1,353 posts

97 months

Tuesday 10th February
quotequote all
Been on reading glasses for over 10years now. Luckily I can still read the time without glasses but the small date is a struggle. So all the recent additions to my collection have been without date if they make one with no date.

I never use the watch to check the date anyway so it's a non-issue for me.

The cyclops magnifyer is such a tell tale that even if its not a Rolex, thieves can spot it a mile away and pay more attention to see if it is 'really' a Rolex. Rather just not deal with the attention the cyclops can bring with it.




The_Nugget

734 posts

79 months

Tuesday 10th February
quotequote all
Cybertronian said:
I'm only 42 and I've started to rely on reading glasses...

I used to have excellent up-close vision, but since hitting my 40s, I find my minimum focus distance is now around 6 inches from my face and growing further.

Hasn't yet started to affect enjoyment of my watch collection, but I've little doubt that my chronographs will be the first to become tricky. I see contrasty dive watches in my future!
My trigger was (aged 46) my arms became too short to read my phone with comfort. reading glasses were cheaper than arm extensions…

WayOutWest

1,045 posts

80 months

Tuesday 10th February
quotequote all
The_Nugget said:
Cybertronian said:
I'm only 42 and I've started to rely on reading glasses...

I used to have excellent up-close vision, but since hitting my 40s, I find my minimum focus distance is now around 6 inches from my face and growing further.

Hasn't yet started to affect enjoyment of my watch collection, but I've little doubt that my chronographs will be the first to become tricky. I see contrasty dive watches in my future!
My trigger was (aged 46) my arms became too short to read my phone with comfort. reading glasses were cheaper than arm extensions
biggrin

NCE 61

2,442 posts

303 months

Tuesday 10th February
quotequote all
Had problems with the date on some of watches until I found this one:-


Cupid-stunt

3,213 posts

78 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
This is my most legible watch.
So easy to read the time as it is so bloomin large.



no date to worry about

The lume is spot on as well....