RE: 2026 Skoda Fabia 130 | UK Review
RE: 2026 Skoda Fabia 130 | UK Review
Today

2026 Skoda Fabia 130 | UK Review

Is the petrol-powered warm hatch really making a comeback? Let's hope so...


Skoda replaced its ‘Simply Clever’ slogan a few years ago, but the manufacturer has retained its knack for making canny decisions. Granted, precious few enthusiasts could tell you the difference between a Kamiq and a Karoq or pick out the Scala in a Fabia lineup, but Skoda’s identikit range has met with success regardless. Last year it built more than a million cars worldwide - a 15 per cent increase on 2024. It has two EVs inside the UK’s top ten. The Elroq seems to be everywhere. 

On the basis of this long-running clairvoyance, it is heartening and perhaps even revealing that Skoda, a firm not overly concerned with hot hatches, feels like now is the time to dip a cautious toe in unfamiliar waters. Not very far in, it must be said - as Sam reminded us back in December, the new Fabia 130 only gathers up 177hp from its lightly breathed-on 1.5-litre four-pot, and will not pull the skin from a rice pudding any quicker than 7.4 seconds - yet even a moderately warm hatch is better than none at all. 

Probably everyone reading this, starved of petrol-burning cars generally and affordable ones specifically, can agree with that sentiment - though it is telling that Skoda, arguably the one VW Group brand not overtly fumbling its EV strategy, does too. Of course, that there is still a gap in the market where any number of modestly lively, cheap-to-run, combustion-engined superminis might sit is as plain as the nose on an EU  lawmaker’s face to anyone who cares to look. All credit to Skoda for being among the first to reverse back through what seems like an open goal. 

And the car itself? Well, it’s fine. Were there still a three-cylinder Ford Fiesta setting the cheap fun benchmark, it might not seem quite so adequate - but there isn’t, so it is. In fact, somewhat inevitably, the depressing lack of anything that really fits the same mould helps to elevate first impressions of the Fabia. Its styling uptick, in the best tradition of warmed-up hatchbacks, is subtle: you get badges, you get bigger wheels, you get a mild frisson of excitement. It helps that the underlying model is crisply well-proportioned. Another Skoda knack is not trying too hard. 

The interior follows suit with smart-looking seats and a sportier steering wheel. You get all the toys, but more importantly you get them in the appropriate places. With rotary knobs for the climate control and actual buttons dedicated to warming your underparts - not to mention a full-size, grip-it-and-rip-it gear lever - the Fabia shows its age inside. Which, of course, is a good thing. The 130 needs a bigger, flashier infotainment screen like a hedge trimmer needs an iPad. 

This trip down memory lane continues with the distant thrum of a non-hybridised four-cylinder engine chirpily doing its thing. Important to remember here that in most other applications, the omnipresent EA211 unit is worthy enough, yet sulkily uninspiring. Skoda’s light dusting of hardware-based alterations hardly unlocks its wild side, but the gentle uplift in performance from the mid-range onwards is just credible enough to make the Fabia feel like it is going about its business with slightly more purpose. 

At any rate, the 130’s limitations are less to do with peak power and more to do with how you’re accessing it. Efficiency, refinement and ease of use aside, precious few small petrol engines benefit from being manacled to a DSG - even one revised with slightly more spirited use in mind - and so it proves here. Reintroducing a manual gearbox into the mix would have made the Fabia no faster on paper (probably the opposite) yet it would surely have seemed so in the real world, with its driver suddenly able to hang onto every gear, in every conceivable circumstance. 

Without that additional level of interaction and oversight, the 130’s neck tends to remain staunchly unwrung. Which is a shame not only in the long tradition of speeded-up superminis (proximity to doorhandles being a defining metric), but also because the Fabia is decently equipped to cope with fun-seeking mistreatment. As Sam noted in abroad, the 15mm lowering of the suspension has not exactly tied the car down, yet you will hardly require more control, just as you will seldom miss a proper diff - the 130 is rarely going fast enough for either to seem strictly necessary. 

This is less of a criticism than you might think - fundamentally, and more often than not, the limited edition Fabia seems like a likeable and well-rounded prospect. The problem, actually vaguely redolent of the original, entry-level Mk7 Golf GTI, is that the 130 seems less like a frothier model deserving of its fairly hefty premium, and more like the kind of congenial hatchback that manufacturers should be starting with, not building up to. Still, if we show enthusiasm for the middle ground Skoda has arrived at here, it might consent to doing something more thrilling with Fabia and its underutilised vRS badge. That really would be clever. Simple, too. 


SPECIFICATION | SKODA FABIA 130

Engine: 1,498cc, inline-four, turbocharged
Transmission: 7-spd dual-clutch automatic, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 177@5,750-6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 184@1,500-4,000rpm
0-62mph: 7.4sec
Top speed: 141mph
Weight: 1,206kg
MPG: 50.4 combined
CO2: 126g/km
Price: £29,995

Author
Discussion

fantheman80

Original Poster:

2,360 posts

71 months

"a firm not overly concerned with hot hatches, feels like now is the time to dip a cautious toe in unfamiliar waters" - id say this is picking up from where it left off with the various Fabia Vrs's of old. Hardly a wild excursion for them although granted against the grain. Missed opportunity though, tepid at best

nickfrog

24,115 posts

239 months

Maybe a decent package overall as a versatile little(ish) hatchback?

Depending on real world price of course, as I assume the £30k list is a fantasy.


Taz73

381 posts

34 months

Seems odd to criticise 177 bhp, That’s still quite a lot in a small ish super mini, it wasn’t that long ago that it would have seemed hot.
And the it’s rarely fast enough for you to miss a diff or feel tied down? I really don’t get that, it’s more than capable of going silly speeds where a lack of feeling tied down can leave you feeling floaty, unconnected and slightly out of control, 177 bhp is more than enough to go too fast.
You guys are spoiled by the ridiculously high performance cars you get to play with, in the real world, well my world, this still seems like a quick hot hatch, if obviously not the hottest.
I quite like it except for the price, but that’s indicative of all new car pricing. Makes the £25k an i20N was released at seem all the more a bargain.

Taz73

381 posts

34 months

Apologies if my post comes through more than once, I had issues posting.

Deerfoot

5,158 posts

206 months

It'll be fine.

My old mk7 Golf TSI had 148bhp and never felt underpowered during the 30 odd months and 20,000 miles I owned it.

These will make a great used choice in a couple of years if Skoda can shift a few of them now.


Hub

6,968 posts

220 months

This is at least the third article on this car?

I like that it exists, it is fast enough for most - though from the badge people will think it is a lot milder.

AlecT

199 posts

231 months

My daughter bought a Fabia Monte Carlo nearly a year ago brand new with the 1.0 engine and DSG gearbox as her first car, looks very similar to this one, all I can say is, what a delightful little car it is!

griffsomething

361 posts

183 months

Performance is pretty similar to the mk5 Golf GTI, which is definitely considered a hot hatch (albeit one from 20 years ago, I know).

Vaguely interesting for not much money these days, well done for having a go at least Skoda.

WPA

13,469 posts

136 months

Fair play to Skoda for trying but a Hyundai I20N would make more sense to me

Edited by WPA on Wednesday 18th February 08:32

evojam

748 posts

182 months

Quite like that,hats off to Skoda for giving us a small relatively lightweight petrol hatch,decent amount of power and at only 1206kg's should feel pretty nippy,Skoda have always been pretty conservative with numbers so as not to upset the apple cart so would'nt be surprised if it was'nt a bit quicker than the quoted times either.

s m

24,128 posts

225 months

griffsomething said:
Performance is pretty similar to the mk5 Golf GTI, which is definitely considered a hot hatch (albeit one from 20 years ago, I know).

7.4 for the benchmark run is the same as a Racing Puma from 26 years ago or a GT86

That was too slow last week …….but a week is a long time in performance musing …

mooseracer

2,613 posts

192 months

As an ownership proposition (rather than reviewing as a hot hatch) - I imagine this is great

triathlonstu

343 posts

171 months

I know inflation is a thing, but it has clearly left me in its wake.

Thirty thousand British pounds for that. Jesus wept.

AllyM

516 posts

198 months

This would suit my needs perfectly for a daily. When discounts?

Trikster

914 posts

224 months

Already c £5k discounts on DTD for example, including £2.5k finance deposit contribution….

ChocolateFrog

34,885 posts

195 months

About £10k overpriced.

It's quite funny that a Skoda badge these days conveys a premium. VW has really worked wonder on the brand and perceived image.

It doesn't seem that long since I was looking at Felicia owners with a real sense of pity.

dukebox9reg

1,685 posts

170 months

Taz73 said:
Seems odd to criticise 177 bhp, That s still quite a lot in a small ish super mini, it wasn t that long ago that it would have seemed hot.
And the it s rarely fast enough for you to miss a diff or feel tied down? I really don t get that, it s more than capable of going silly speeds where a lack of feeling tied down can leave you feeling floaty, unconnected and slightly out of control, 177 bhp is more than enough to go too fast.
You guys are spoiled by the ridiculously high performance cars you get to play with, in the real world, well my world, this still seems like a quick hot hatch, if obviously not the hottest.
I quite like it except for the price, but that s indicative of all new car pricing. Makes the £25k an i20N was released at seem all the more a bargain.
It has no extra torque over the 150 though so wont feel any quicker at lower revs/normal driving and the reason for this is its limited by the 7spd dry clutcher. Which means its rubbish for anyone wanting to tweak it, which is part of the charm of a warm hatch.

note, I do know you can upgrade the clutch packs (£1200) and remap the box (£500) but along with labour (£1000+) to fit the clutch its not exactly cheap. So its a shame its not the DQ500.


Edited by dukebox9reg on Wednesday 18th February 10:49

Ecosseven

2,292 posts

239 months

Nice enough car. Personally I would have liked to see a manual but appreciate they will probably sell more by offering it as DSG only. Performance is almost identical to my 2014 Seat Leon 1.8FR - similar power, torque and weight so not unexpected.

I like Skoda as a brand and hope this is a success for them.

Don Roque

18,218 posts

181 months

It looks excellent, the numbers stack up for something that should be a decent drive every day. It's only a hundred-odd kilos heavier than an Abarth 595 Competizione and they aren't slow. I should think 177bhp in that little package will be more than adequate.

Sometimes, it's nice to not have so much power that you can barely use a fraction of it. I regularly drive a MK4 Focus ST and a current-gen Octavia vRS. The Focus has a good chunk more power but the Octavia makes far better use of it's 245bhp and is far better to spend a few hours in.

Back to this Skoda, I think the DSG is probably a smart choice. I'd be happy with a manual and it would be nice for them to offer it as an option but like most things, once most motorists have tried a good auto they don't really want to go back.

RedWhiteMonkey

8,457 posts

204 months

ChocolateFrog said:
About £10k overpriced.

It's quite funny that a Skoda badge these days conveys a premium. VW has really worked wonder on the brand and perceived image.

It doesn't seem that long since I was looking at Felicia owners with a real sense of pity.
Time flies, the Felicia went out of production 25 years ago!

Skoda is a quality product, design is subjective but I personally think their design language is better than VW at the moment.

£10k overpriced? £30k is what cars seem to cost these days, obviously that was a bit different 25 years ago, I think I paid £4k for a brand new Fiat Punto in 2001.

Edited by RedWhiteMonkey on Wednesday 18th February 10:05