Surface Transforms
Surface Transforms
Author
Discussion

gtsralph

Original Poster:

1,309 posts

168 months

Tuesday 3rd March
quotequote all
Surface Transforms (AIM: SCE) manufacturers of carbon fibre reinforced ceramic automotive brake discs, announces the following major customer update.

Major customer update - Loss of contract

The Company has been informed by General Motors ("GM") that it is re-sourcing its supply of brake disks with effect from 31st March 2026. GM is the Company's most significant customer and in FY 2025 formed £15.3m (84%) of revenues and 85% of discs sold and was under contract until 2030. Additionally, since November 2024 GM has provided the Company with operational support and financial assistance including advance payments of £14.4m.

Outlook

The Company has not yet had the opportunity to speak directly with GM about the termination, but the loss of this contract has a material impact on the Company's ability to trade and as a result the Directors intend to immediately engage corporate restructuring advisers to protect stakeholder's interests. Further information will be provided as appropriate.

TDT

6,142 posts

143 months

Tuesday 3rd March
quotequote all
Yeah - just seeing that news filtering through.

I imagine that could be curtains now? It's just too expensive to make this kind of manufacturing working in the UK I guess.

There are quite a few other CCM vendors popping up out of China foundry's now - so even if the product isn't quite the same - the costs and availability will outweigh the performance.

The best ability is availability!

Guyr

2,530 posts

306 months

Tuesday 3rd March
quotequote all
Shares have fallen 95% today.

Slippydiff

16,078 posts

247 months

Tuesday 3rd March
quotequote all
gtsralph said:
Surface Transforms (AIM: SCE) manufacturers of carbon fibre reinforced ceramic automotive brake discs, announces the following major customer update.

Major customer update - Loss of contract

The Company has been informed by General Motors ("GM") that it is re-sourcing its supply of brake disks with effect from 31st March 2026. GM is the Company's most significant customer and in FY 2025 formed £15.3m (84%) of revenues and 85% of discs sold and was under contract until 2030. Additionally, since November 2024 GM has provided the Company with operational support and financial assistance including advance payments of £14.4m.

Outlook

The Company has not yet had the opportunity to speak directly with GM about the termination, but the loss of this contract has a material impact on the Company's ability to trade and as a result the Directors intend to immediately engage corporate restructuring advisers to protect stakeholder's interests. Further information will be provided as appropriate.
What could possibly go wrong ...

ChrisW.

8,049 posts

279 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
Ceased manufacturing on the 12th March ?

gtsralph

Original Poster:

1,309 posts

168 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
March 30, Liverpool Echo:

Around 70 workers have been laid off at a Merseyside company that was given a £13m loan by the Liverpool City Region - as the firm teeters on the brink of administration following the loss of a major contract.

Workers at supercar parts manufacturers Surface Transforms told the ECHO they were laid off by email an hour before their shift started. Others said they were turned away by management as they arrived at work.

Update today:

A third Notice of Intention to appoint administrators has been filed by Knowsley-based Surface Transforms. The move buys the manufacturer of carbon fibre reinforced ceramic automotive brake discs more time to try and rescue the stricken business. The NOI protects the company against any creditor enforcement action for a further period of 10 working days. Surface Transforms had previously published NOIs on March 12 and March 25, 2026.

Digga

46,744 posts

307 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
From both a patriotic POV and also selfish (I have a set of their discs on my car) perspective, I hope the company can be saved. It does seem to be the sort of tech that a UK based manufacturer can and should be able to carve out a niche in.

993rsr

3,639 posts

273 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
Digga said:
From both a patriotic POV and also selfish (I have a set of their discs on my car) perspective, I hope the company can be saved. It does seem to be the sort of tech that a UK based manufacturer can and should be able to carve out a niche in.
When I spoke to their (then) Chairman almost 20 years ago at Spa, one of the things that surprised me was their significant lack of patents and IP.

That may have been a consequence of the process and technology not enabling such protection, or the competition found a simple way to circumvent the patents, but it's no surprise that other comanies in the far east have replicated (and improved) their product and manufacturing process at higher scale and lower price.

They could never get sufficient volume to make the business credible, the only way would have been re-locating manufacturing to low cost countries and scaled up, which is what their competitors have done.

I would expect GM have already moved with one of the alternatives. Sad as you say for the employees, suppliers and a UK company, but was only ever a matter of time IMO.

Edited by 993rsr on Friday 10th April 13:23

Digga

46,744 posts

307 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
993rsr said:
Digga said:
From both a patriotic POV and also selfish (I have a set of their discs on my car) perspective, I hope the company can be saved. It does seem to be the sort of tech that a UK based manufacturer can and should be able to carve out a niche in.
When I spoke to their (then) Chairman almost 20 years ago at Spa, one of the things that surprised me was their significant lack of patents and IP.

That may have been a consequence of the process and technology not enabling such protection, or the competition found a simple way to circumvent the patents, but it's no surprise that other comanies in the far east have replicated (and improved) their product and manufacturing process at higher scale and lower price.

They could never get sufficient volume to make the business credible, the only way would have been re-locating manufacturing to low cost countries and scaled up, which is what their competitors have done.

I would expect GM have already moved with one of the alternatives. Sad as you say for the employees, suppliers and a UK company, but was only ever a matter of time IMO.
Yes it's a shame. There are other places you can go to get brakes re-freshed. I know you and I both used Rebrake in Munich in the past. It's just that anything overseas adds time, cost and complexity and, out of sheer laziness and convenience, I'd always tend to prefer a UK solution.

Given the amount of motorsport based in the UK, let alone automotive, it is a shame they never found any volume.

All that said if, in theory, Far Eastern product is usable and cheap enough, it moves the goalposts closer to that of steel in terms of single use.

modeller

529 posts

190 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
From today's Times:

The government last year launched its Drive35 ambition to decarbonise the automotive industry within a decade. Ministers claim it will create 50,000 jobs and unlock £7.5 billion in private investment.
Outside of the big well-known manufacturers, winners of government support to get businesses toward commercial readiness include HyProMag, based in Birmingham, producing magnets from rare earth minerals in motors in electric vehicles; Maeving, an electric motorbike manufacturer based in Coventry; and Elm Mobility of Banbury in Oxfordshire, producing final-stage delivery vehicles.
among those due to receive scale-up funding from the department are Surface Transforms, a specialist carbon-ceramic brake discs business in Liverpool, which last month had its listing on Aim, London’s junior stock market, cancelled after it appointed administrators with a view to selling the business. A departmental official said the company has “been successful in the application process but has not yet undergone the financial checks and due diligence required to receive the funding”.

PorscheGirl

118 posts

110 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
Usually with such grants, one does not qualify if one is in administration.

Personally, I think they are well worth saving and hope they get through this

ras62

1,111 posts

180 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
I imagine the cost of production is the main driver of this. It is a high energy use process after all. Just another example of the impact of the insane green eco zealots policies. AI powerhouse promiss looking rather silly after the OpenAI news

gtsralph

Original Poster:

1,309 posts

168 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
They never really attained reliable scaled up production volumes and OEMs need confidence in supply chains.

Guyr

2,530 posts

306 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
Their accounts have been terrible forever.

Last two years they made £4m Gross Profit on sales of about £8m, but spent £24-£27m on Admin and R&D.

IMI A

9,959 posts

225 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
They need to be taken out by an OEM tbh. They've been promising jam tomorrow to investors for as long as I can think. Very dissappointing GM pulled out in the way they did but to be reliant on one OEM for 80% plus of your business very high risk.

Digga

46,744 posts

307 months

Saturday 11th April
quotequote all
Guyr said:
Their accounts have been terrible forever.

Last two years they made £4m Gross Profit on sales of about £8m, but spent £24-£27m on Admin and R&D.
I’d heard this. I can imagine the R&D bit to be extremely, eyewateringly costly, but I haven’t seen split with basic management costs.

FL Racing

126 posts

36 months

Saturday 11th April
quotequote all
I know Rebrake can referb PCCB’s but can you also do Surface Transform?

Digga

46,744 posts

307 months

Saturday 11th April
quotequote all
FL Racing said:
I know Rebrake can referb PCCB s but can you also do Surface Transform?
Good question and I do not know the answer. Also, decent as they are, it’s not just a couple of week process.

LiamH66

1,074 posts

115 months

Saturday 11th April
quotequote all
FL Racing said:
I know Rebrake can referb PCCB s but can you also do Surface Transform?
Yes, Surface Transforms are supposedly good for resurfacing twice, and it wasn't that expensive. Think it might have been a return to factory job though.

nxi20

784 posts

229 months

Sunday 12th April
quotequote all
My understanding is that the discs can be put in a lathe & re-surfaced 2-3 times. They are of a fundamentally different construction to PCCBs which are a thin layer laid on top of a carbon ceramic matrix.

I will add that (10 years ago) ST were extremely difficult to deal with - the main problems being a total lack of communication and somewhat optimistic timelines. One order I remember took the best part of a year to materialize & then the bells had been incorrectly manufactured. All the while having embarrassing conversations with the customer. That was the last order we put in...