RE: Aston Martin V12 Vantage S | Spotted
RE: Aston Martin V12 Vantage S | Spotted
Yesterday

Aston Martin V12 Vantage S | Spotted

10 years on, there's not much quite as thrilling as a 7-speed, 12-cylinder Aston Martin


There’s no powertrain configuration out there quite as glamorous as the manual V12. There’s all the power and theatre of a dozen cylinders, with the control and excitement of pairing the potency with your own gearshifts. Ferrari is probably the most famous exponent of the manual V12, but it’s (understandably) not the cheapest way into it - not with 456 values having been brought up of late. 

Thanks to cars like the DB7 Vantage and DB9, however, Aston Martin still represents the most affordable way into a V12 with three pedals. In very handsome cars, too, from just £20,000. Sure, the engine may not be the most thoroughbred of V12s, and it’s a brave soul who takes a punt on a 25-year-old British super GT, though it’s always going to remain a very appealing prospect. Until they’re £40k and you’re kicking yourself at missing the opportunity. 

This V12 Vantage S is very far from the cheapest Aston Martin with a manual and a V12, though it could well still be the most desirable. The first V12 Vantage was a bit of a brute all things considered, and was noticeably improved with the ‘S’ overhaul of 2013, which revised the suspension and steering as well as freeing some extra power for a better driving Vantage. But the six-speed manual had gone in favour of a Speedshift auto, and that was worse. It was so near and yet so far for the V12 S. 

The introduction of the seven-speed manual in 2016 finally brought the best from the package: the interaction of a clutch pedal and lever, with a properly honed chassis. Better late than never at all. It was a fitting farewell for a much-loved era; not the fastest car point to point, but hugely involving, as capable as anyone would really need, and very cool.

To nobody’s surprise, the manual S V12s are now significantly more valuable than the original cars and the later Speedshifts. Both of those are available for £70k or less, and what a huge amount of style, swagger and speed that’s going to buy. But to get a seven-speed manual, more than £100,000 is needed; there are fewer of them, and they’re the best ones, so it stands to reason. 

As a 2018 car this must be one of the last, and the colourway is very special: £14k was spent to add the yellow accents inside and out against the Heritage Racing Green that are intended to evoke the DB4 GT. That was commissioned by its only owner, who’s driven it just 25,000 miles and always serviced it at Aston Martin Works. Just the kind of connoisseur to whom a V12 S manual would appeal. Every MOT has been flawless, of course, as is the overall condition. So it’s for sale at £134,000, or barely any less than the original RRP. That’s the power of a fabulous manual V12. 


SPECIFICATION | ASTON MARTIN V12 VANTAGE S MANUAL

Engine: 5,935cc V12
Transmission: 7-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 573@6,750rpm
Torque (lb ft): 457@5,750rpm
MPG: 16.6
CO2: 395g/km
Year registered: 2018
Recorded mileage: 25,000
Price new: £140,495 (before options)
Yours for: £134,000

See the original advert

Author
Discussion

Geoffcapes

Original Poster:

1,110 posts

187 months

Yesterday (11:00)
quotequote all
Epic car, but the one in the ad with the luminous paint just looks.... well, a bit crap.

cirks

2,528 posts

306 months

Yesterday (11:08)
quotequote all
I'm sure it looks better in the flesh but is it just me who thinks all those photos are massively underexposed?

Augustus Windsock

3,711 posts

178 months

Yesterday (11:16)
quotequote all
Personally I’d prefer it with just the yellow grill and the interior accents, I’d slap a wrap over the sills, and the lower front and rear bumpers to tone it down a bit
Having said that there’s a well known semi-retired pro snooker player lives around the corner from me with a metallic grey Bentley Conti GT with similar lime green/yellow external highlights which to me look terrible but obviously appeal to some.

CH80

333 posts

20 months

Yesterday (11:22)
quotequote all
25k miles and £134k. Too much.

Slowlygettingit

865 posts

64 months

Yesterday (11:36)
quotequote all
Great car but I think in the most awful colour combination I have seen.

Familymad

1,860 posts

240 months

Yesterday (11:37)
quotequote all
Agree

Slowlygettingit

865 posts

64 months

Yesterday (11:37)
quotequote all
Great car but I think in the most awful colour combination I have seen.

Dr G

15,807 posts

265 months

Yesterday (11:42)
quotequote all
Augustus Windsock said:
Personally I d prefer it with just the yellow grill and the interior accents, I d slap a wrap over the sills, and the lower front and rear bumpers to tone it down a bit
Agreed, was going to say exactly the same. Gloss black on those and dark, satin grey on the wheels. Would really lift its appearance.

Pickle_Rick

683 posts

83 months

Yesterday (11:49)
quotequote all
cirks said:
I'm sure it looks better in the flesh but is it just me who thinks all those photos are massively underexposed?
Helps hide the awful colour tbf

Cryssys

806 posts

61 months

Yesterday (12:36)
quotequote all
Slowlygettingit said:
Great car but I think in the most awful colour combination I have seen.
Looks a bit chavtastic to these eyes

Would sit well on bricks.

pSyCoSiS

4,152 posts

228 months

Yesterday (12:44)
quotequote all
That must be sublime to drive. Proper V12 bellowing away with you deciding when to change into the next gear.

Agreed, colour combo not to everyone's taste. But, a cracking car nonetheless.

WPA

13,599 posts

137 months

Yesterday (12:46)
quotequote all
Slowlygettingit said:
Great car but I think in the most awful colour combination I have seen.
Agreed plus seems expensive

Jte3397

396 posts

119 months

Yesterday (13:53)
quotequote all
Probably faster cars available for the money but if I had the money it would go for one of these. As I'm happy with SMG in my M3, I'd probably save a chunk and go with the Speedshift (well, I'd try it first).

disco666

527 posts

169 months

Yesterday (14:59)
quotequote all
I've not driven an S, but I struggle to see the drive being worth £75k more than the original.
The original is indeed a bit of a brute, but isn't that part of the appeal? Otherwise just get a DBS.
One of the advantages of the S was that it was available in a wider range of colours, but this mix is not one I would go for.



Edited by disco666 on Tuesday 10th March 19:21

thegreenhell

21,863 posts

242 months

Yesterday (15:48)
quotequote all
I love the green and yellow, but hate the black wheels and clear rear lights. Paint the wheels a lighter shade and swap in some red rear lenses and it would be perfect.

mikEsprit

856 posts

209 months

Yesterday (16:30)
quotequote all
thegreenhell said:
I love the green and yellow, but hate the black wheels and clear rear lights. Paint the wheels a lighter shade and swap in some red rear lenses and it would be perfect.
Black wheels are ugly.

The paint scheme doesn't work on this car because the yellow mouth makes it look like a cartoon car. I think it might work with the larger grille on other AMs, but not this one. Aston Martins should be pretty. This is more cute.

cirks

2,528 posts

306 months

Yesterday (17:52)
quotequote all
Pickle_Rick said:
Helps hide the awful colour tbf
Obviously it's dark green car day what with this and the Audi A3 too!
I don't mind green cars but it doesn't suit the Aston

thegreenhell

21,863 posts

242 months

Yesterday (17:55)
quotequote all
cirks said:
Pickle_Rick said:
Helps hide the awful colour tbf
Obviously it's dark green car day what with this and the Audi A3 too!
I don't mind green cars but it doesn't suit the Aston
It least it has a colour, and not yet another boring grey/black like 99% of modern Astons.

SR

331 posts

228 months

Yesterday (18:02)
quotequote all
As a manual V8 Vantage owner this would be a dream car for me, just not in those colours.

sean ie3

3,257 posts

159 months

Yesterday (19:04)
quotequote all
Agree with a PP, the yellow snout and calipers would be better.