Does VED tax rate affect your decision on buying a car?
Does VED tax rate affect your decision on buying a car?
Author
Discussion

ABMA

Original Poster:

212 posts

45 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
With the annual VED rate rise, I find myself reluctant to consider certain cars (E.g BMW M6 GC pre 2017) which have a tax rate of > £760.
Am I on my own or do others put the VED into consideration when deciding on their car purchase?

mmm-five

12,191 posts

309 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
Depends what you're planning on using the car for, and the estimated mileage. Low mileage makes less sense than high mileage.

In my case the VED is a minor cost compared to my fuel, trackdays, servicing and consumables, which will cost significantly more than the VED.

The VED on my Z4MC (which did up to 30,000 miles a year in the past) will be £790 when I next pay it.

To put that into context:
  • a single day (say 10-15 laps) at the Nurburgring will cost over £1000 (6 tanks of fuel = £600; 10-15 laps = £250-£325; 1-2 hotel nights = £100-£150; LeShuttle/LeFerry = £150-£400) - I don't tend to go for a single day though, so whilst the fuel/laps increase, the average daily costs reduce as the fuel / travel costs getting there and back are split across more days...and on only some of those days would the track be open.
  • a single day ay a UK track = £300-£500
  • for my 25,000 mile commute the fuel would cost about £7000 (at 2026 average price for 98+RON).
  • maintenance on it would also be c.£3k (1 set of tyres; 1-2 sets of pads; 1 set of discs; at least 4 oil services; 1 major service).
Edited by mmm-five on Monday 30th March 12:52

OutInTheShed

13,548 posts

51 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
Yes, >£700 is beyond the pale.
It also correlates (but not exactly) to high fuel costs.

You have to really want that kind of car to justify the extra, or find that the big engine variants are silly cheap to buy.
It starts to make sense to SORN if you don't really need the car one month.

I have a shed in the £300+ tax band and a couple of motorbikes.

A500leroy

7,908 posts

143 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
Yep, pre 2016 low powered £20 petrols for me.

Huzzah

28,721 posts

208 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
Yes always a consideration, along with insurance and other running costs. If I want a particular vehicle I may have to use man maths to justify it.

loskie

6,832 posts

145 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
YES

I object to giving the inept UK Govt more than I have to.

"Luxury car tax": That figure should go up with inflation AFAIK it hasn't. £41 K(?) list isn't that much these days.

Kuwahara

1,436 posts

43 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
It probably would but shouldn’t really,top VED works out at just over £2 a day ,people spend twice that on a coffee daily .

Feel like I’m beating the system at the minute with a C class at £35 a year.

Chris Type R

8,887 posts

274 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
mmm-five said:
Depends what you're planning on using the car for, and the estimated mileage. Low mileage makes less sense than high mileage.
I sold my 20 year old Alfa GT recently, and one of the reasons was that with the low mileage I was putting on the car, VED had become ~ £1 per mile.

GR_TVR

793 posts

109 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
No, but I do then moan about it on a pretty much weekly basis to my friends.

Just worked out I pay over £3,200 a year in VED at the moment...that might make me change my mind vomit

_Rodders_

2,173 posts

44 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
I avoid top rate.

The next band down would be serious consideration but I'd do it for the right car.

500x

178 posts

36 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
I've bought 2 £40k+ rrp cars since summer 2023, a DS9 and a C5X both under a yr old with very low miles.

In both cases I've thought the extra VED.....£2k over 5 years or whatever it is has been more than discounted from the price I paid for the cars.

It's like if one version of a car costs £39k new and sells for £X almost new, and another version costs £43k new it also seems to sell around £X almost new, because the market has adjusted the price.

Whilst I object slightly to forking out the extra money I do think the cars I got would have cost circa £3k-£5k more if they didn't suffer from higher VED.


Stick Legs

8,573 posts

190 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
No.

In the overall scheme of cost of ownership road tax is small beer for anything I'd be interested in.

Anyone who wouldn't buy a Range Rover because its in the higher tax band is being completely unserious about the actual cost of running these cars.

I feel really sorry for the fans of some very good and cost effective cars like Mondeo's and Rover 75s that will be killed off by this.

So no for myself, but can absolutely see why it would affect some.

Familymad

2,067 posts

242 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
Yep
Avoid at all costs.

bigmowley

2,565 posts

201 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
Funnily enough for me not so much buying the cars but it influences the selling decision. It s a bit like a dripping tap that eventually annoys you enough to do something about it. Most of my fleet are over £500/year and my average is pretty high (I dare not work it out frown ). I tend to have little holidays for a month or so at renewal time, useful time to get things done, big services, paintwork etc. That way I feel like I get better value for money.
The second hand market for high VED vehicles is almost non existent now, which is a shame as there are lots of lovely old barges about.

Edited by bigmowley on Monday 30th March 14:26

CABC

6,198 posts

126 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
Not everyone is aware of the 2016 threshold. As awareness grows that will hit demand of the £800 cars.
I’m sure some still shop for the dream and gulp too late.
In future they’ll only search for ved below £x

loskie

6,832 posts

145 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
Just looked at my 2.0 tdi Golf derv Alltrack. 10/2016. 125 co2s. I think it's dropping from £195 to £165 per year. 6m newer and it would have been much more. I was thinking about changing it. But TBH there's nothing else I can think that would be better for my needs. Plus I quite like it and the freedom of no debt or stress about dinging it.

Jo-say8k

247 posts

41 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
I have five historic band cars to choose from driving

paul_c123

2,042 posts

18 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
loskie said:
Just looked at my 2.0 tdi Golf derv Alltrack. 10/2016. 125 co2s. I think it's dropping from £195 to £165 per year. 6m newer and it would have been much more. I was thinking about changing it. But TBH there's nothing else I can think that would be better for my needs. Plus I quite like it and the freedom of no debt or stress about dinging it.
Car tax rates now: https://www.gov.uk/vehicle-tax-rate-tables/rates-f...
Car tax rates from April 2026: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69a...

None of the rates are going down, so I don't know why you think yours is. 125g/km CO2 (at that age of car) would put it in Band D, which is going up from £165 to £170.

loskie

6,832 posts

145 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
must be my mistake. I'm sure it was £195.

Anyway. Whatever it is I will cope! Thanks for pointing out my error.

Jonstar

1,033 posts

216 months

Monday 30th March
quotequote all
If the car is special enough, then I don't care. Avoiding it puts you out of contention of some lovely metal, and Im not dying regretting not buying a car because of a few hundred quid.