RE: BMW M5 (E39) vs M5 (G90) | PH Origin Story
RE: BMW M5 (E39) vs M5 (G90) | PH Origin Story
Yesterday

BMW M5 (E39) vs M5 (G90) | PH Origin Story

The M5 to end them all meets the latest plug-in chapter of the lineage...


The curious dynamic of the car enthusiast means this looks like a one-sided comparison. One in the older, much less powerful car’s favour. This is far from the first PH Origin Story, but on first impressions it looks the least sympathetic yet on the modern-day instalment – and the chance of it demonstrating its lineage. The reason? Cars get barely any more godlike in the eyes of most PHers than the E39 M5. A controversial 2.4-tonne hybrid taking on arguably the best saloon car of the last quarter century (and perhaps beyond) has only one outcome, right?

Hope is handed to the G90 by the wonderful work of the BMW UK press office, who’ve had the brilliant idea to specify this example in the same Le Mans blue as their beautifully kept heritage E39. Even the most curmudgeonly cynic has to concede this is a great-looking pair, the latest M5 a bit less burly without an estate body and wearing this blue on silver getup. The low-key menace and unmistakably early noughties angel-eye lights of the E39 still quietly upstage it, yet these two complement each other magnificently in the metal. 

But we want them to share ideas and philosophies, not mere paint codes. A quick scan of their spec sheets or a cursory walk around makes them appear far from equals. A naturally aspirated 4.9-litre V8 driving the rear wheels only versus a twin-turbo 4.4-litre V8 hybrid and all-wheel drive. A six-speed manual playing an eight-speed auto. A car whose weight figure is topped up by cute contemporary luxuries like double-glazing, a six-disc changer and an integrated Motorola flip phone, parked beside one possessing a battery two-thirds the size of a fully electric Twingo’s. And with its bodywork straining at the seams, it looks every inch like that’s the case.

The fact a V8 still lives up front spurs the G90’s recovery, though. An engine manufactured right here in Britain, no less, the Hams Hall plant in the Midlands taking responsibility for S68 production when Munich retooled for the Neue Klasse revolution. It’s a factory that can claim Mini GP and BMW i8 engines in its 25-year history and it feels like a welcome slice of industry positivity that it now motivates one of the most illustrious models of all.

It’s a headbanger of an engine, too, a real gem hidden among the wider headlines about the G90’s mass and complexity. Crucially this is a PHEV whose zero-emission miles are a bonus to be sought out, not a hurdle to its performance – simply get in and drive the thing with abandon and you’ll consume its petrol and electric power like the disparate elements of a Jaegerbomb. Body control is decent enough, too, though the softest Comfort setting of its damping is as much as you’ll likely tolerate on the road – Sport feels very tense indeed – and it’s not a car many folks will immediately gel with, rather one to figure out as the miles pile on and a favoured setup is tagged to one of its bright red M buttons. As you might expect, next to the E39 its intense configurability looks overwrought, but I think modern M cars do get this stuff right. Always rousing and up-for-it right out the box, with the potential for more as you hold the setup menu on-screen and adjust its parameters on the fly.

Something I typically toggle every time I get in the car is the DSC button, winding it back to mid-way, ‘4WD Sport’ mode where the M5 is more than feisty enough for road driving without ever being spiky. It feels more agile than a car of this heft ought to, diving its nose into bends keenly, the feeling of an astute front axle it shares with an M2 or M3 allowing you to have more confidence teasing some playfulness from the rear. You’re just always mindful of its sheer size; it never, ever escapes its width, even in tamer driving as you wince on spindlier urban and rural roads when traffic approaches. Aggressively taking up so much space without truly warranting it does have a whiff of ‘manosphere’ about it, I have to admit. 

Such issues never plague the older car, even though it too must have felt a sizeable thing in the context of its late '90s launch. It’s a decade that’s quickly nominating itself as a real high point for the character we crave in cars; generous spoonfuls of sound and interaction, allied to enough refinement and grip to feel usable every day. So long as you’re rust aware. Whether it’s an F355, Elise, Williams or a humble little Puma, the icons of this era all have one thing in common: the sense of a cohesive engineering team all pulling precisely together in the same direction. You glean a similar sensation here, not least against the backdrop of its 2020s successor attempting to hit several competing targets at once.

This is my first shot in an E39 M5, and life behind its wheel is a little calmer-paced than I’d anticipated. It feels good for its 400hp when on song, and it’s jolly quick whichever gear you’re hauling – but it requires work to hit the hedonistic heights it’s capable of. With its slightly ponderous manual gearbox and no forced induction, frenzied acceleration is more deliberately acquired than in the three decades of sports saloons that followed in its wake. You dictate its flow with your inputs, not drive mode selections, which is surely music to the ears of most true enthusiasts. But there’s no denying it’s harder work than the newer car. On a challenging B road you can keep it in third or fourth and string together a smooth, subtle flow of maintained momentum and minimal forearm movements as the V8 alters enjoyably in tone and timbre as you go – or wrap your head around its more languid shifts and get stuck into changing gear to keep the whole thing on the boil, tension in the chassis, grip limits within grasp. At which point the true superstar surfaces.

It is no less impressive when cheerily settling back down to a fuss-free cruise. Indeed, it feels built for very long distances. It’s damped beautifully, the steering is light and subtle (but still satisfying) and its thick glass ensures top-notch refinement. Over the bumpier roads that make the G90 feel fraught, the E39 communicates just enough of the road surface to keep its driver in the loop but not so much that it disturbs the ambience inside. Shame it only takes six CDs at once – you could happily drive as long as it takes to work through your whole collection. The G90 is fab on a long-haul too, of course, sitting at much lower revs and whispering along without any engine buzz at all in the right conditions. The screens look bamboozling on static display, though they work wonderfully on the move; invest some time in the potential of its tech and the staggering size of its remit begins to reveal itself. 

Considered together, these two feel like a perfect diorama of the growing size, weight, performance and technology in cars, not least with the same visual spec to act as the control. Crucially, they both still demonstrate similar strands of DNA. The E39 isn’t a big-hitting thriller on first impression, demanding your commitment to show its true M tricolours, whereas the G90, like all modern M cars, allows its thrills to be more hastily accessed thanks to the quick actions of its paddleshift ‘box, its coddling mid-way stability systems and the cheat-code press of an M button to tense all its muscles in one go. Oh, and the small matter of the instant torque of its electrification…

It borders on a contractual obligation for a car journo to complain about its weight and elaborate tech, though your stein must be very much half-empty to not then acknowledge that the latest M5 still has the power to gratify despite either issue. To precisely no one’s shock, the E39’s iconic reputation remains nailed on after a day in its company, and it's hard to imagine another revisit in 25 years ultimately conferring that status on the G90. But for now, in the presence of greatness, the newest M5 can at least depart with its chest as puffed out as its shoulders.


Specification | 2026 BMW M5 (G90)

Engine: 4,395cc, twin-turbo V8, plus 18.6kWh battery and permanently excited synchronous motor
Transmission: 8-speed auto (electric motor incorporated), all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 727 (engine 585@5,600-6,500rpm)
Torque (lb ft): 738 (engine 553@1,800-5,400rpm)
0-62mph: 3.5secs
Top speed: 155mph (189mph with M Driver’s Pack)
Weight: 2,435kg (DIN)
Price: £114,095

Specification | 2001 BMW M5 (E39)

Engine: 4,941cc, V8, naturally aspirated
Transmission: 6-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 400 @ 6,600rpm
Torque (lb ft): 369 @ 3,800rpm
0-62mph: 5.3secs
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1,795kg (DIN)
Price: £52,000 (new), £25,000-£55,000 (now)

Author
Discussion

pSyCoSiS

Original Poster:

4,183 posts

229 months

Saturday
quotequote all
The E39 is peak, benchmark M5 for me and one of the best cars I have ever owned.

Genuine question - how does the new model 'only' get to 189mph with over 700bhp, whereas the E60 M5 was doing over 200mph more than 20 years ago?

GeniusOfLove

4,831 posts

36 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Maybe it's because I'm becoming a middle aged fart, I don't know, but I struggle to be even slightly interested in any M5 since the E60 with it's gloriously silly engine and ground breaking looks.

This one seems particularly hard to care about. I suppose the figures are great if you're a top trumps player but a Tesla from 8 years ago is better if that's what turns you on. I can honestly say that if offered either for free I'd take an E39 or E90 without hesitation and then go out to give it a good hard spanking.

I'll go shout at some clouds now.

I 8 a 4RE

516 posts

265 months

Saturday
quotequote all
“ It’s a decade that’s quickly nominating itself as a real high point for the character we crave in cars; generous spoonfuls of sound and interaction, allied to enough refinement and grip to feel usable every day.”

I dare you to talk like this in your local and see what happens.
Your CoPilot editing impresses nobody.

Baddie

761 posts

241 months

Saturday
quotequote all
From the rear the G90 looks like Marlon Brando’s cheek in the Godfather

g3org3y

22,145 posts

215 months

Saturday
quotequote all
E39 M5 is one of the cars I grew up lusting over. cloud9

T400BHP numberplate also iconic, many magazine features - was on a red M5 previously (JC 'head to head' video).

SydneyBridge

11,055 posts

182 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Cannot even look at the new one, the old one is absolutely perfect

John Allison

25 posts

140 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Side by side it looks like they started the test with two E39s then one of them went into anaphylaxis

howardhughes

1,329 posts

228 months

Saturday
quotequote all
SydneyBridge said:
Cannot even look at the new one, the old one is absolutely perfect
100% agreed.



howardhughes

1,329 posts

228 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I've loved every model of the M5 apart from this version. How anyone signed this off is beyond words.

JRaj

115 posts

97 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Saw a black M5 G90 driven very sedately. It looked like a tank is the best way to describe it. No grace or discreteness about it.

I'm sure it will go well and be a missile, but give me a mint E39 anyday of the week..

Dynion Araf Uchaf

5,081 posts

247 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I like the look of the new M5.
But the borkability costs should it go wrong would scare me into not buying one. At the very least I could only have one if in warranty.

However as I can’t afford it , I don’t have to worry about it

911Spanker

3,091 posts

40 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I 8 a 4RE said:
It s a decade that s quickly nominating itself as a real high point for the character we crave in cars; generous spoonfuls of sound and interaction, allied to enough refinement and grip to feel usable every day.

I dare you to talk like this in your local and see what happens.
Your CoPilot editing impresses nobody.
I would probably have a great chat with a few people.

HuggyBearFezzy

68 posts

206 months

Saturday
quotequote all
As an old-school BMW fan, I very much enjoyed reading this article. The E39 M5 still feels like peak M car to many of us – compact, understated and full of character, with that howling NA V8 and manual box that make every drive feel special.

While it seems the G90 is insanely capable and devastatingly fast, from the article it almost feels like a different species now rather than an evolution of that old-school M5 recipe. Ofcourse there is also the extra weight and size issue too.

For me the F90 was the closest BMW got to replicating the E39 and it's the modern M5 I would lean towards

E39, F90 and G90 all sat on the drive, which keys are you really grabbing for an early Easter Sunday morning blast?

My hand is gripping the E39 keys

HuggyBearFezzy

68 posts

206 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Baddie said:
From the rear the G90 looks like Marlon Brando s cheek in the Godfather
Hahaha! Cannot unsee this now! A bit like the can't unsee the Porsche 911 in the rear of an i8

Edited by HuggyBearFezzy on Saturday 4th April 10:55

shuthan_b

320 posts

153 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I am a Honda guy, and not a particular fan of BMW despite owning one a while back, the E39 M5 is the only BMW I would probably have in my man cave car garage. They have aged soo well and sound spectacular. The E39 is peak 5 series for me.

cerb4.5lee

41,823 posts

204 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I had those dials from the E39 M5 in my E53 X5 4.8iS, and I always liked the way they looked(especially the warm up lights around the rev counter). I'm not hugely fond of the current M5, but I wouldn't say no to it though.

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,596 posts

122 months

Saturday
quotequote all
Did about 100k miles in my E39 M5 from new back in the day. It was a very good car for its day but would feel horribly dated today. It's not that fast and the rack isn't great. True the new M5 is a bit of a bloated mess but the current M3 is actually the same size as an E39 and a much, much better car....

cerb4.5lee

41,823 posts

204 months

Saturday
quotequote all
g3org3y said:
E39 M5 is one of the cars I grew up lusting over. cloud9

T400BHP numberplate also iconic, many magazine features - was on a red M5 previously (JC 'head to head' video).
I immediately associated that numberplate from the magazines that I've read over the years too. thumbup

It also makes me feel old too, because magazines aren't much of a thing now for me in comparison to years back for example.

Augustus Windsock

3,721 posts

179 months

Saturday
quotequote all
I’d go so far as to say that anybody who prefers the G90 over the E39 M5 really should question whether they should be on Pistonheads.
As said many time the E39 iteration of the M5 is the peak for the M model, although I have a hankering for an E28 M5 (preferably in grey)
Given the choice of an E28 or E39 for me would be like having to choose which is your favourite child…

GreatScott2016

2,271 posts

112 months

Saturday
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
g3org3y said:
E39 M5 is one of the cars I grew up lusting over. cloud9

T400BHP numberplate also iconic, many magazine features - was on a red M5 previously (JC 'head to head' video).
I immediately associated that numberplate from the magazines that I've read over the years too. thumbup

It also makes me feel old too, because magazines aren't much of a thing now for me in comparison to years back for example.
Me too smile, subscribed to Evo magazine from initial launch. As for the cars, not a fan of the old car’s wheel design, but where it trumps the new car is the interior. Simplistic, but what a lovely place to be.