What is the lowest prosecution speed in a 70 mph limit?
What is the lowest prosecution speed in a 70 mph limit?
Author
Discussion

Jon39

Original Poster:

14,542 posts

167 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all

I think there used to be an advisory of about 10% plus 3 mph, but they have probably changed that now to 70 +0.1 mph.

Speedo reads 3mph fast at 70 mph. It was showing about 75mph when the camera van was spotted, so my speed must have been 72 mph.

Usually have Waze switched on for alerts, but not today.

Fortunately I have never social media'd anything that is now deemed inappropriate, so if I appeal to the ECHR, that should let me off a custodial sentence.


Cylon2007

597 posts

102 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
The law is that if you exceed to speed limit at all you can be prosecuted, you are referring to the well known advisory 10% +2. which is just that advisory, so normally over 79mph is normal BUT you can be done for less.

Terminator X

19,733 posts

228 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
78 on Speedo never had a ticket. Seen plenty of money grabbing bds safety cameras too.

TX.

venster70

117 posts

62 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
I would be literally shocked if that results in any kind of motoring conviction!

ARH

1,655 posts

263 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
10% +2 is where they start prosecuting so 77mph can get you a fine, if they play by the advisory limits. But more likely an SAC if you haven't done one for 3 years.

Milkyway

12,369 posts

77 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
Barney Walsh got caught averaging 58 in a temporary 50 zone on the M4.
So, 10% +2 sounds about right.
I would imagine that his Mercedes SUV's speedo was pretty accurate.
Three points & £185 fine.
(Unfortunately that made it twelve points on his licence... Resulting in a six month ban.)

Edited by Milkyway on Friday 10th April 16:03

sixor8

8,049 posts

292 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all
10% is to allow for device tolerance. I'm sure I'd read on here asking for proof of those saying they'd been done for 32 in a 30. Nobody ever did, this is often bandied about by people on SAC courses. A friend of mine (genuinely, not me!), recently got a ticket for 86 mph on the M5 and for once, a driver said 'fair cop.' He must have been indicating over 90 mph.

Even though he was just on the cusp of doing a course, he took the 3 points and £100 fine. I did one last summer, it cost £100. 40 in a 30 near Telford. rolleyes

Here's the guidelines:


Jon39

Original Poster:

14,542 posts

167 months

Friday 10th April
quotequote all

Thank you all for your replies.

In recent years I have tried hard to adhere to all speed limits.
The reason is not points or licence, but by having a car collection I never want to be paying loaded premiums on six policies for 5 year periods. Insurers ask about convictions during the past 5 years. Think points remain in force for 3 years. Under some circumstances, insurers could pocket 10 times the amount of the fine, although they probably do not load premiums for just 1 conviction.

If you visit Wales you can play the 20 mph game. Set cruise control to 19mph. See how many cars you can gather in the queue behind you, when in a 20 mph limit on a straight, wide, deserted road. Award yourself extra points, for each following driver who cannot stand it any more and eventually decides to overtakes you. smile


Pica-Pica

16,158 posts

108 months

Tuesday 14th April
quotequote all
Jon39 said:

Thank you all for your replies.

In recent years I have tried hard to adhere to all speed limits.
The reason is not points or licence, but by having a car collection I never want to be paying loaded premiums on six policies for 5 year periods. Insurers ask about convictions during the past 5 years. Think points remain in force for 3 years. Under some circumstances, insurers could pocket 10 times the amount of the fine, although they probably do not load premiums for just 1 conviction.

If you visit Wales you can play the 20 mph game. Set cruise control to 19mph. See how many cars you can gather in the queue behind you, when in a 20 mph limit on a straight, wide, deserted road. Award yourself extra points, for each following driver who cannot stand it any more and eventually decides to overtakes you. smile
.or just dab the speed limiter on at 25 mph.
(I don't know any 20 mph roads that are straight, wide, and deserted)..

Super Sonic

12,682 posts

78 months

Tuesday 14th April
quotequote all
sixor8 said:
10% is to allow for device tolerance. I'm sure I'd read on here asking for proof of those saying they'd been done for 32 in a 30. Nobody ever did, this is often bandied about by people on SAC courses. A friend of mine (genuinely, not me!), recently got a ticket for 86 mph on the M5 and for once, a driver said 'fair cop.' He must have been indicating over 90 mph.

Even though he was just on the cusp of doing a course, he took the 3 points and £100 fine. I did one last summer, it cost £100. 40 in a 30 near Telford. rolleyes

Here's the guidelines:

Surely this should he a sticky by now? It's been asked enough times.

944 Man

1,861 posts

156 months

Cylon2007 said:
The law is that if you exceed to speed limit at all you can be prosecuted, you are referring to the well known advisory 10% +2. which is just that advisory, so normally over 79mph is normal BUT you can be done for less.
79mph is prosecution speed.10% + 2mph is the speed that they have you at, not the safe speed.

PhilAsia

7,177 posts

99 months

Yesterday (09:26)
quotequote all
944 Man said:
Cylon2007 said:
The law is that if you exceed to speed limit at all you can be prosecuted, you are referring to the well known advisory 10% +2. which is just that advisory, so normally over 79mph is normal BUT you can be done for less.
79mph is prosecution speed.10% + 2mph is the speed that they have you at, not the safe speed.
The safe speed could be 200mph. Limits were introduced because many cannot differentiate between a safe 26mph and an unsafe 31mph or 46mph.