Employing over 45s
Author
Discussion

JonPH

Original Poster:

115 posts

82 months

Controversial, but I’m interested if other firms have a reluctance to employ over 45/50s, as people start slowing down /getting ill ?

Glassman

24,648 posts

239 months

You can't put a price on experience.

GT6k

948 posts

186 months

As someone who has employed people from 20s to 60s and changed career at 56 I don't think there is a problem. Personally I value the mixed demographic of my current, public sector, employer.

JonPH

Original Poster:

115 posts

82 months

I’d always valued experience and this thread is clearly over generalisations.

That said , we like huge commitment which we’ve traditionally found with those under 40 .

greygoose

9,432 posts

219 months

It’s more about the person than their age in my experience, some in their 20s are lazy and addicted to their phones, others are keen to learn and get on. A mixture of ages and experience of the job and life works best in our office, older staff can pass on their knowledge to the younger ones coming in. Whilst you highlight older staff being absent due to health issues, they are less likely to be off on maternity leave for extended periods so it’s swings and roundabouts.

craigjm

20,664 posts

224 months

People start slowing down and getting ill at 45/50? Any company that really thinks that is going to struggle with the rising retirement age and the slowing of the birth rate.

Doofus

33,376 posts

197 months

Older people have more experience and, generally, aren't still climbing the greasy pole, so can be more loyal.

Assuming the reason they're looking for a job is not because they've been fired from every previous one for being st.

S***n D*****k, I'm looking at you.

98elise

31,608 posts

185 months

craigjm said:
People start slowing down and getting ill at 45/50? Any company that really thinks that is going to struggle with the rising retirement age and the slowing of the birth rate.
Agreed. I wouldn't expect anyone in that age range to be any slower or ill than someone younger, unless it was a very physical job.


Glassman

24,648 posts

239 months

98elise said:
craigjm said:
People start slowing down and getting ill at 45/50? Any company that really thinks that is going to struggle with the rising retirement age and the slowing of the birth rate.
Agreed. I wouldn't expect anyone in that age range to be any slower or ill than someone younger, unless it was a very physical job.
Whilst I wear all the hats of running a business, the main part of my job is physical. I'd say I'm much more efficient in my output in that regard.

Giving the likes of Autoslags 10 jobs a day was more for their vanity. It makes no sense in the real world and just knackers people out as well as forces them to cut corners or make mistakes.

AB

19,830 posts

219 months

I think the best employees at the moment are 30+

My experience of having early 20's working for me is that they think they know best, try and do all their work on their phone and don't like listening to instructions. When I came out of uni, 20 years ago, I was diligent, hard working and eager to learn. Young people come out of uni and think they've made it and they're owed something for having gone through uni.

All stems from kids being told they can be whatever they want to be and that if they don't like it they can complain.

LuckyThirteen

932 posts

43 months

Over 45 is the generation that learned what it is to graft.
Not whinge
Not whine
And just to get the job done.

Personal responsibility comes with the package.
As does an inbuilt toughness that is sadly lost.

Your over 45 will spend more time worrying about company results than how they look, how they post or using pronouns.

They understand productivity. Not just how to spell it and produce a graph

helmutlaang

499 posts

183 months

Interesting.

I was employed in my current role at 53.
I’ve recently started applying for jobs I can easily do and I’ve not even had a second look in. I’m nearly 55 now.

So who knows?

Nicetobenice

482 posts

2 months

JonPH said:
I d always valued experience and this thread is clearly over generalisations.

That said , we like huge commitment which we ve traditionally found with those under 40 .
What is it you do?

Terminator X

19,788 posts

228 months

craigjm said:
People start slowing down and getting ill at 45/50? Any company that really thinks that is going to struggle with the rising retirement age and the slowing of the birth rate.
A chap I know is 68, still working at a high level and ran some marathons through deserts just a few years ago. 45 is old?

TX.

Crumpet

5,085 posts

204 months

I think a lot is down to the individual. Some guys I know in their 60s appear to be powered by Duracells, whereas some of the 20s and 30s lot have got Poundland specials.

What’s very noticeable though is that anyone 50+ who starts with us that doesn’t have relevant experience almost always struggles. The ability to learn and adapt seems to drop off a cliff.

That being said, the work ethic and attitude of some of the late 20s people I’ve worked with recently has been atrocious. I kicked one out of a taxi for refusing to wear a seat belt; there’s an entitled attitude to a lot of them.

xx99xx

2,737 posts

97 months

Try public sector, applications are blind sifted so the recruiters don't see any information to give away the persons age, gender, religion, ethnicity etc.

Older applicants tend to have more transferable skills so are likely to be suitable for higher graded roles and usually happier to stay there. The young ones have to start at the bottom and usually move on quickly as they need more money just to live.

Quattromaster

3,024 posts

228 months

Very small company owner here, probably employed 40-50 people over the years.

My best employee I took on at 55 yrs old, and he's just retired at 76, he did go part time after covid.

I'd not hesitate again. Age is but a number.

Olivera

8,563 posts

263 months

In my large corporate world there are honestly very, very few people left aged over 50. Probably a ratio of 100:1 of those working in their 30s or 40s vs 50s+.

RustyNissanPrairie

573 posts

19 months

50+ ers have one foot in the analogue age and the other foot in the digital age.
Best of both worlds that can design something in Solidworks and then make it by hand on an old Myford lathe or Bridgeport Mill

muppets_mate

828 posts

240 months

JonPH said:
I d always valued experience and this thread is clearly over generalisations.

That said , we like huge commitment which we ve traditionally found with those under 40 .
What is your definition of 'huge commitment'? Long hours, evening and/or weekend working, travelling on personal time, short notice travel, frequent stays away from home...?