RE: Honda CR-Z | Shed of the Week
RE: Honda CR-Z | Shed of the Week
Yesterday

Honda CR-Z | Shed of the Week

In 2026, Honda recorded its first-ever annual loss - the CR-Z is a reminder of better times


Another first-timer makes a soft landing in Shed’s world of sub-£2k MOTed cars this week in the intriguing and some would say misunderstood shape of Honda’s CR-Z. When this hybrid-assisted coupé came onto the market in 2010 the motoring press was a bit discombobulated by it. They liked its looks and the provision of a slick 6-speed manual gearbox but they didn’t understand how a 2+2 coop with hybrid assistance, albeit mild, would only have 123hp from a 1.5 i-VTEC engine/electric motor combo. They noted that it wasn’t that easy to see out of the back of it, with or without the nippers who were the only ones capable of fitting in the rear seats, but most agreed that the payoff for that was distinctive styling.

Hamstrung by its niche-ness, the CR-Z was phased out worldwide in 2015, and before that in the UK where you’ll struggle to find one registered later than 2013. You may have other views, but Shed thinks that it still looks fresh today. Admittedly he’s a Honda junkie, having sworn by many of their cars, superbikes, mopeds, scooters, quad bikes, mini tractors and lawn mowers over the years. Honda had the knack for creating interesting machinery once upon the rialto. What went wrong there?

Couple of things to get out of the way with our shed. It’s been a Cat N car, and the engine management light is on. As you know, a Cat N vehicle is one that has been written off by insurers, not because of serious damage that has made it unrepairable but because of the disproportionate cost of fixing the car relative to its value. Damage to a Cat N car will generally be cosmetic and therefore nothing to be afraid of. 

Some will bleat about N categorisation reducing the value of a car, although that’s hardly relevant when the price tag is already small. Our 140,000-miler from 2011 seems amenably priced at £1,995 and you could probably chip a bit off that to take it off their ‘ands etc. Shed did find a cheaper one at £1,950, a privately owned 2010 car with 10 months left on its MOT, but that had 154,000 on the clock and rust infesting both rear suspension mounts. Most decent CR-Zs will be nearer to £3,000 than £2,000, with low-milers typically coming in at between £5.5k and £7k. 

Let’s say you do take the plunge on this one, what will you get? On paper, not a lot. You might just make it into the nines for the 0-60mph run, or make your way quite easily into them if you’re in one of the post-2012 facelift cars that were upgraded to around 135hp. More usefully, good efficiency, a smooth stop-start system, three driving modes and a weight of under 1,200kg will deliver average mpg figures in the mid-50s and an annual VED bill of just £35. That’s coming from the vendor, so don’t blame Shed if it’s wrong.

These CR-Zs might not set your pants on fire performance-wise but they do drive very nicely with lightweight suspension and a sporty driving position. They have a very good reputation for reliability, too. Shed found a CR-Z forum post from a US owner who had bought his CR-Z in 2011 with 237 miles on the clock. Fourteen years later it had done just under 406,000 miles, very little having gone wrong in that time. At that point he planned to give the car away as its original clutch was failing and he was looking at a biggish bill for a new one. The car was still on its original hybrid battery. 

What about the illuminated EML on our shed? When it lit up in the aforementioned American mega-miler it turned out to be a solenoid issue, but if it’s a steady light here it could be nothing worse than a failing seal on the petrol filler cap. Changing that might well clear the alert. It could produce another one for emissions, but there’s a good chance that remedial action (i.e. changing the cap) will gradually clear everything up after a few more starts and miles. 

Rusty rear ends like on that £1,950 car we talked about earlier are pretty common on CR-Zs, but there’s no indication of rot anywhere on our shed’s MOT history. Door handles are known for playing up, and if you’re not careful replacing them can generate new problems with window operation. Seat materials in either cloth (as here) or leather on Dynamic pack cars can wear through on high milers, but that’s normal for high mileage cars isn’t it? Just be grateful that your car has proved itself capable of lovely high mileages in the first place. 

Insuring a Cat car can be challenging, but in Shed’s experience insuring any car these days is challenging. He remembers when you were rewarded for sticking with an insurance company, not mugged off for not changing like you are now. If he could find some way of self-insuring he would do it. The good thing about these CR-Zs is that they are in a low group, 17E if that means anything to you, so the intensity of the mugging-off experience will be less. 

Not many CR-Zs were bought, but if the ‘how many left?’ websites are anything to go by most of the ones that were bought in the UK are still knocking about, the gradual downwards curve into oblivion that applies to the graphlines of most cars on those sites being replaced on the CR-Z’s by a near-flat plateau. Face-ripping performance might not be a CR-Z’s schtick, but sweet handling, low running costs and that increasingly rare and pleasant sensation that you’re the owner of something that’s both special and cheap surely count for something.


See the original advert

Author
Discussion

Billy_Whizzzz

Original Poster:

2,573 posts

168 months

Yesterday (05:10)
quotequote all
Someone will be along in a minute complaining there isn’t a 3 year warranty on this.

Master Bean

5,013 posts

145 months

Yesterday (05:58)
quotequote all
Number plates look weird.

el romeral

1,975 posts

162 months

Yesterday (06:14)
quotequote all
Not sure I have ever seen one of these. It is certainly distinctive. Must be a very mild hybrid. Front numberplate looks terrible like that.

BeastieBoy73

784 posts

137 months

Yesterday (06:26)
quotequote all
Fancied one of these (or Volvo c30) for my daughter as her first car but they were over budget at the time.

Cool little cars!

wistec1

766 posts

66 months

Yesterday (06:33)
quotequote all
The Mrs had her eyes on a new one of these back in the day but turned rodent faced when she realized the rear seats would only fit two pygmy's in or a couple of carrier bags. Performance was a bit underwhelming as well as I recall despite the promising looks.

Anyway where's the postmistress gone? No mention of her for a while unless I missed some Shed pleasuring whit. I do hope political correctness hasn't crept into his jouno shed or she's off hired him.

FrankandLynn

68 posts

18 months

Yesterday (06:43)
quotequote all
Not a car that has ever crossed my consciousness- I was literally unaware they existed. Honda reliability, relatively sporty low-slung looks, low costs, and a dashboard from a fighter-jet… a combination which should excite many. I could be tempted.

humphra

608 posts

117 months

Yesterday (06:44)
quotequote all
wistec1 said:
Anyway where's the postmistress gone? No mention of her for a while unless I missed some Shed pleasuring whit. I do hope political correctness hasn't crept into his jouno shed or she's off hired him.
I'd been wondering the same! Friday mornings feel a bit dull without Shed providing my end of week sniggering.

As for the car.... having had a CRX VTEC, when these first came out i thought, at last! Something to replace the one I'd been regretting selling..... then I saw the performance figures and thought, "oh."
Still, I do like these and was tempted again by one last year (and i really liked the Mugen RZ version!), but I can't have all impractical cars and this would have been just another.

spreadsheet monkey

4,691 posts

252 months

Yesterday (06:51)
quotequote all
Cool looking car, and a good shed. Clear styling links to the original CR-X if you’re old enough to remember that one.

Makes a good basis for a “K swap” engine transplant, where you drop in a 2.0L engine from a Civic Type R…

Watcher of the skies

1,171 posts

62 months

Yesterday (06:57)
quotequote all
I've always liked these. I don't know a great deal about them but being a Honda I'd be confident that it would be a painless shed.

edoverheels

566 posts

130 months

Yesterday (07:02)
quotequote all
I had assumed that these were all automatics.

Gary29

5,038 posts

124 months

Yesterday (07:02)
quotequote all
I liked these too, when they first came out I thought they were going to turn into a modified icon like the EP3, but no tuning companies ever looked at them twice and no one else seemed to like them, so proves what I know.

Taz73

419 posts

37 months

Yesterday (07:07)
quotequote all
I enjoyed mine, a lot of fun to drive around, surprisingly torquey when accelerating out of corners but no it wasn’t fast, a lot of fun though and the gear change was excellent.

Andy86GT

931 posts

90 months

Yesterday (07:08)
quotequote all
Back in 2013 when I last bought a car for myself, I was considering one of these for the low fuel consumption and tax. However they were very pricey for the lackluster performance offered, and the dealer in Coventry (now gone unsurprisingly) couldn't have been less interested in selling one.
Decided to go heart over head and bought the GT86 which I still have wink

NH-0

679 posts

121 months

Yesterday (07:09)
quotequote all
Another car Honda were too early with, might have sold better today as people understand hybrids?

Jamescrs

6,054 posts

90 months

Yesterday (07:28)
quotequote all
I was at a track day at the Nurburgring last November and there was a lady driving one of these around the track, noticed it because it was the first one i've seen in years. She was going pretty well until mid afternoon when there was an unfortunate incident with a barrier which i am sure wrote the car off.

AndySheff

6,865 posts

232 months

Yesterday (07:35)
quotequote all
Never knew these existed. But lacklustre performance, weird looks, odd numberplate, dings and scratches, that driver seat headrest ?! hurl small back seat, and the EML light on. I'll pass.

POIDH

3,206 posts

90 months

Yesterday (07:35)
quotequote all
Another one who had CRZ or C30 as cool(ISH) first car. We couldn't find a CRZ in budget, so he has same age Civic instead.
I do like the styling of these and they are a nice place to drive down the road.

GianiCakes

635 posts

98 months

Yesterday (07:43)
quotequote all
I think that’s a great option as a 2nd/3rd car for station duties and general errand running. Genuinely small and imo worth cherishing long term. Not quick but with a nice gear change should still be satisfying to drive.

bigmowley

2,565 posts

201 months

Yesterday (07:45)
quotequote all
Owned one four 7 years from new, Mrs BigM loved it. Sold it on 70K miles and it’s still knocking around now, must have some big miles on it now. Totally reliable, slow but fun to drive. Over 50MPG is a pipe dream, they are not particularly efficient, ours averaged 43MPG over 70K miles. A Golf diesel would trounce it for economy. It’s a strict 2 seater really, back seats are smaller than a 911. Best used with the seats folded down and a bigger boot.

DKS

1,854 posts

209 months

Yesterday (07:53)
quotequote all
Very interesting, but that one is dented, missing parking sensors and mismatched colours. Something missing in the dash? Can do better for £2k I think.