RE: Porsche 928 S | High Mile Club
RE: Porsche 928 S | High Mile Club
Yesterday

Porsche 928 S | High Mile Club

We say 'high mile' - if you join the 928 club, sky's the limit


Cast your mind back to the mid-‘70s. Porsche's board, led by Ernst Fuhrmann, had concluded that the rear-engined 911 was an evolutionary dead end — too noisy, too tricky at the limit, too dependent on a layout that belonged to the previous decade. The future, they decided, was front-engined, water-cooled and V8-powered. The 928 was that future: aluminium body panels over a steel monocoque, a rear transaxle for weight distribution, pop-up headlamps that made it look like nothing else on the road. It won European Car of the Year in 1978. The only sports car ever to do so, before or since. And then the buying public politely ignored it in favour of the car it was meant to replace.

We know how the story ends. The 911 got better, the 928 got cancelled in 1995, and Porsche's transaxle era became a footnote. But Porsche footnotes don’t tend to obey the same rules as those of a lesser carmaker; they might ebb and flow in value, yet they accrue fans regardless. And then, decades after they were sold new, they become a source of fascination to anyone who was a child at the time, who now finds themselves with the means to revisit the whole transaxle family - 924, 944, 968 - and suddenly take their pick. 

This particular car is one of the earliest UK-delivered 928 S models. The S introduced a larger 4.7-litre V8 producing 300hp and 284lb ft of torque, mated here to the dog-leg five-speed manual that became rarer as Porsche’s auto improved. Black full leather interior, electric seats, sunroof help make it note perfect. Plus someone has fitted a Porsche Classic Radio and JL Audio sound system, which is the kind of thoughtful modernisation that suggests an owner who actually drove the thing rather than mothballing it.

And drive it they did. Nearly 150,000 miles is not unheard of in 928s - these were built for autobahn work, after all - though not every car of its vintage has been treated to £100k in documented service and maintenance invoices. Probably it’s safe to conclude that this is the sort of daily that someone adored enough to keep spending money on long after loved ones (and accountants) would have told them to stop. It's described as turn-key ready, which is easy to believe. 

There are caveats to the 928 experience, of course. The vacuum-operated systems are notoriously fiddly, electrical gremlins potentially lurk in any car of this vintage and complexity, and parts costs for a low-volume, aluminium-bodied GT car from the early ‘80s probably aren't for the faint of heart. This is what makes a well-kept, documented 928 so attractive: without the reassurance of paperwork, you might find yourself taking a header into a money pit with pop-up headlamps.

The kicker is the asking price. Granted, the 928 is some distance from its dirt-cheap days, but nor is it as expensive to buy as the car it was meant to kill. Even without haggling, £35k for a front-engined Porsche V8 grand tourer with a dog-leg manual, proper provenance and the enduring loveliness of Guards Red doesn’t seem like too high a price to pay. The 911 won the war, sure. But the 928 makes an interesting counter-argument for itself even now. 


SPECIFICATION | PORSCHE 928 S

Engine: 4,664cc, V8, naturally aspirated
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 300
Torque (lb ft): 284
CO2: N/A
MPG: N/A
Recorded mileage: 141,155
Year registered: 1980
Price new: N/A
Yours for: £34,900

See the original advert

Author
Discussion

Bobby Lee

Original Poster:

281 posts

80 months

Yesterday (16:33)
quotequote all
Respect for the mileage but good luck on the asking price…

I guess we’ll find out how “desired by collectors” it really is.

Richard-390a0

3,342 posts

116 months

Yesterday (16:42)
quotequote all
A lovely old thing from my childhood & maximum respect to whomever kept on spending! They see me rollin' they hatin' !!! biggrin

bigmowley

2,573 posts

201 months

Yesterday (17:19)
quotequote all
I have a couple of these in my storage facility. Still look fresh but tiny by modern standards. One has a sports exhaust on it and it sounds simply lovely. I think that both are well over 100K miles so they can certainly do the mileage.
They seem very complex and fiddly to keep in spot on condition though. Both of them are always off to the garage for this and that to be sorted. I think the basics are solid enough but all the ancillary stuff is very complex and not that well engineered. Just look at the belt runs bigmouth. They both leak various fluids like an old tractor biglaugh

Robertb

3,602 posts

263 months

Yesterday (17:28)
quotequote all
I imagine you could buy a cheaper one, but then could end up spending loads getting it up to this ones apparent standard.

Any car with a dogleg box is always a good thing.

_Rodders_

2,221 posts

44 months

Yesterday (17:30)
quotequote all
Thought I was going to see 250k+.

140k in a reasonably well built car doesn't seem that impressive to me.

JJJ.

4,913 posts

40 months

Yesterday (17:51)
quotequote all
Hard to believe that the design is not far off fifty years old. Fantastic.

SR

579 posts

230 months

Yesterday (17:55)
quotequote all
These look better and better as the years pass I think.

Unreal

9,595 posts

50 months

Yesterday (17:56)
quotequote all
Keep the oil fresh and the engines will do galactic mileages.

Any owner is only likely to do a thousand or two miles or year at most so extremely unlikely that they will have a terminal failure unless they keep the car for another 50 years.

I'd be more concerned about rust than anything else.

cerb4.5lee

42,458 posts

205 months

Yesterday (17:56)
quotequote all
JJJ. said:
Hard to believe that the design is not far off fifty years old. Fantastic.
Completely agree. thumbup

I think they're stunning for sure.

RSstuff

1,015 posts

40 months

Yesterday (18:00)
quotequote all
Looks out of place with the other stock the dealers has, how long before they trade it out?

Motormouth88

718 posts

85 months

Yesterday (18:27)
quotequote all
I’d understand the asking price if it were on 50k miles

Murph7355

41,143 posts

281 months

Yesterday (18:34)
quotequote all
I started to get itches about 968CS and then 928s (S4 would be my pick)...

Almost to the extent that purchase was inevitable...but couldn't see anything that really floated the boat and the urge has passed.

Love them though.

JJJ.

4,913 posts

40 months

Yesterday (18:37)
quotequote all
Motormouth88 said:
I d understand the asking price if it were on 50k miles
I'd say the Porsche specialist priced it on condition and history. Also, it's a rarer manual which some will crave, rightly or wrongly.
Still, hard to look past an S4 auto imo.


Turbobanana

8,082 posts

226 months

Yesterday (18:44)
quotequote all
A successful company director will have bought this new, 46 or so years ago.

He or she will have ploughed up and down the motorway network for 3 years, drumming up business and racking up 20k per year. So that's 60k, give or take. In style and comfort, doing what it was designed for.

The car will have been sold at 3 years old and replaced by a BMW 635 CSi. Or one of those new-fangled Bentley turbo jobbies, if they were doing very well.

The subsequent owners have therefore covered 80k miles in the following 43 years. 2k per year.

How is this a high mileage car?

carinaman

24,643 posts

197 months

Yesterday (19:16)
quotequote all
My consumption of CAR Magazine should've been restricted when I was a child. Besides the XJS versus 928 front cover issue there was an article about a high mileage 928S aquaplaning on a Belgium (I think) M-way and bouncing off of the armco.

1986 S2.5 for me please, S4 chassis improvements with the 16V V8.


Unreal

9,595 posts

50 months

Yesterday (19:22)
quotequote all
Motormouth88 said:
I d understand the asking price if it were on 50k miles
It wouldn't be in a thread called High Mile Club would it. banghead

paulguitar

34,402 posts

138 months

Yesterday (19:27)
quotequote all
carinaman said:
1986 S2.5 for me please
...Is the correct answer, ideally in guards red with black leather sports seats.

I spent a lot of time in exaclty that in the late '80s.



Castrol for a knave

7,332 posts

116 months

Yesterday (19:32)
quotequote all
Barely run in at that mileage. In fact, you want one with a few miles on it. Like most classics, they are more problematic when they have not been driven.

Engines are solid and impressively well engineered. Yes, they have uber long cambelts but the change interval is 4 to 5 years and the S engine is non interference, so not the end of the world if it goes.

They really are not complicated or expensive to maintain. But, they do not like deferred maintenance, so you need to keep on top of them.

These things were designed and built by the engineers, who locked the accountants in a dungeon for 20 years

That price is fair given investment, condition and demand for decent S manuals.

They don't really rust. The main body is galvanised and the panels are aluminium. Odd bit of galvanic here and there but easy to prevent with paste or fibre washers (front wing fixings by the indicator repeater are worst culprits).

Very under appreciated.

Arsecati

2,746 posts

142 months

Yesterday (20:10)
quotequote all
When I saw 'High Mile Club', I was expecting to see around 300k+. When I saw 141k, I thought it was a typo.......... car is only just run in for god sake - give me a shout when it has actually doubled this pitiful mileage!

sean ie3

3,387 posts

161 months

Yesterday (20:11)
quotequote all
I think that the one I want is late mode manual GTS, exactly my cuppa.