WW2 With Tom Hanks
Author
Discussion

The Gauge

Original Poster:

7,033 posts

40 months

Friday 29th May
quotequote all
Anyone watching this?

Sky History channel. The first 3 episodes were released on Tuesday, hopefully it will be really good



shirt

25,271 posts

228 months

Friday 29th May
quotequote all
I watched them all the other day. It’s nothing new, but has a lot of footage I’ve never seen before, some of which was quite jaw dropping.

nicanary

11,167 posts

173 months

Friday 29th May
quotequote all
shirt said:
I watched them all the other day. It s nothing new, but has a lot of footage I ve never seen before, some of which was quite jaw dropping.
Agreed. I watched the first episode only, hoping the others would be repeated ad nauseam during the week. No such luck. It was nothing special, but there was new footage (new to me) although it was always difficult to beat World At War.

wolfracesonic

9,078 posts

154 months

Friday 29th May
quotequote all
nicanary said:
Agreed. I watched the first episode only, hoping the others would be repeated ad nauseam during the week. No such luck. It was nothing special, but there was new footage (new to me) although it was always difficult to beat World At War.
Every programme of this type lives in the shadow of World at War; how can you compete with interviews with Donitz, Speer, ‘Bomber’ Harris, Mountbatten etc? Plus Dear Larry’s wonderful pronunciation of Ukraine!

Legacywr

15,402 posts

215 months

Friday 29th May
quotequote all
WW2 ended 80 years ago, why are people expecting anything new?

I’m quite enjoying it, it’s being presented very well IMO.

Halmyre

12,478 posts

166 months

Friday 29th May
quotequote all
Does Tom only turn up in the last half of the series?

getmecoat

Radec

5,809 posts

74 months

Friday 29th May
quotequote all
Can't take Tom anywhere as it's always a disaster, planes, boats, trains, cars.

Now it's a flipping world war

Eric Mc

125,285 posts

292 months

Saturday 30th May
quotequote all
Legacywr said:
WW2 ended 80 years ago, why are people expecting anything new?

I m quite enjoying it, it s being presented very well IMO.
It was such a huge conflict which engulfed most parts of the world and hundreds of millions of people that there are still stories emerging - and different observations become possible as unresearched archive material is either released or found.


The benchmark for all World War 2 series has to be the Thames TV series "The World at War" which was released in 1973. They deliberately decided to make this programme then because they knew that many of the senior protagonists who were still alive at the time were getting old and wouldn't be around much longer. They actually started their interviewing in 1971.

I have the DVD boxed set of TWAW which conytains some additional information over the original series. Jeremy Isaacs, the producer, says that if he was doing it again he would have put a lot more emphasis on the war in Eastern Europe and he admits that they barely covered the war inn China at all. The China/Japan conflict resulted in tens of millions of deaths and hardly gets a mention, even now.

Legacywr

15,402 posts

215 months

Saturday 30th May
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Legacywr said:
WW2 ended 80 years ago, why are people expecting anything new?

I m quite enjoying it, it s being presented very well IMO.
It was such a huge conflict which engulfed most parts of the world and hundreds of millions of people that there are still stories emerging - and different observations become possible as unresearched archive material is either released or found.


The benchmark for all World War 2 series has to be the Thames TV series "The World at War" which was released in 1973. They deliberately decided to make this programme then because they knew that many of the senior protagonists who were still alive at the time were getting old and wouldn't be around much longer. They actually started their interviewing in 1971.

I have the DVD boxed set of TWAW which conytains some additional information over the original series. Jeremy Isaacs, the producer, says that if he was doing it again he would have put a lot more emphasis on the war in Eastern Europe and he admits that they barely covered the war inn China at all. The China/Japan conflict resulted in tens of millions of deaths and hardly gets a mention, even now.
Agreed about TWaW, still one of the best series ever In the world of television. The theme tune plus LO’s voice are spine tingling.

Rh14n

1,093 posts

135 months

Saturday 30th May
quotequote all
Anyone see Tom Hanks on The One Show last night? Is it me or did he look a bit strange?

Wacky Racer

41,104 posts

274 months

Saturday 30th May
quotequote all
Nothing ever will beat The World at War, narrated by Sir Laurence Olivier.

Anyway, their war was Dec '41 until 1945, biggrin

Eric Mc

125,285 posts

292 months

Saturday 30th May
quotequote all
The fact that World War 2 historians like James Holland, Max Hastings and Anthony Beevor are so successful these days seems to indicate to me that there is a still insatiable appetite for WW2 stories.

I have to confess that I am a WW2 junkie and I do an awful lot of reading of WW2 books. I'm currently reading "Sword", a new book by Max Hastings on the events on Sword beach on D-Day.

I'm also building a model of a Douglas TBD Devastator. I met Ensign George Gay in 1981. He was the only survivor of an entire Devastator squadron that was shot down during The Battle of Midway.

nicanary

11,167 posts

173 months

Saturday 30th May
quotequote all
said:
Oddly enough, I was walking on Sword beach last month. I went with one of those Leger holidays to visit the beaches and memorials. It's not cheap, but the guides know their stuff (I believe they're all ex-military) and it's all very well organised. Virtually all beach obstacles and defences are gone - just the bunkers left and of course parts of the Mulberry harbour. They are seriously nice beaches for a family holiday if you ignore the past.

Bright Halo

3,921 posts

262 months

Saturday 30th May
quotequote all
This or World at War should be compulsory viewing for all teenagers around the world.

paulw123

4,709 posts

217 months

Sunday 31st May
quotequote all
I am enjoying it. Think it's definitely worth watching.

Shows that we really haven't learnt many lessons from the past though.

Dan_The_Man

1,160 posts

266 months

Sunday 31st May
quotequote all
It's a good watch

Wills2

29,142 posts

202 months

Sunday 31st May
quotequote all
Wacky Racer said:
Nothing ever will beat The World at War, narrated by Sir Laurence Olivier.
Agreed, his narration was superb.



GetCarter

31,088 posts

306 months

Sunday 31st May
quotequote all
Wills2 said:
Wacky Racer said:
Nothing ever will beat The World at War, narrated by Sir Laurence Olivier.
Agreed, his narration was superb.

Great title music too.

PRO5T

7,323 posts

52 months

Sunday 31st May
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
Wills2 said:
Wacky Racer said:
Nothing ever will beat The World at War, narrated by Sir Laurence Olivier.
Agreed, his narration was superb.

Great title music too.
The only thing I find with a lot of old documentaries is it's difficult to engage a younger audience with low definition and 4:3 aspect.

Yes a lot of the old footage is obviously even worse but they can make it fit. High definition everywhere and our expectations of it is ruining a lot.

I do have TWAW on Blu-Ray remastered but it's so long since I watched it that I don't recall how good the quality is. I do agree though, my kids will be watching it once they're old enough.

Eric Mc

125,285 posts

292 months

Sunday 31st May
quotequote all
It definitely has a very 70s feel to it. All the interviews would have been filmed on standard 16mm film stock which gives it a soft and grainy look.

The use of graphics to describe campaigns etc is very reminiscent of the opening titles for "Dad' Army". I reckon they were inspired by that smile