RE: Mercedes-McLaren SLR MSO Edition | Spotted
RE: Mercedes-McLaren SLR MSO Edition | Spotted
Saturday 6th June

Mercedes-McLaren SLR MSO Edition | Spotted

The SLR was outrageous as standard, but not beyond improvement - step forward McLaren Special Operations... 


It would be fair to say that the Mercedes-McLaren SLR, despite its wild looks, exotic construction and prodigious power, was never quite as beloved as its early-'00s hypercar contemporaries. While cars like the Ferrari Enzo, Pagani Zonda and Porsche Carrera GT were raved about for their raw, visceral thrills behind the wheel, the mixed messages of the SLR driving experience left reviewers less enamoured. 

The cushiness of the Mercedes bits jarred with the focus of the McLaren bits which, if the stories are to be believed, is sort of how the development journey went. The ultimate Mercedes two-door was going to be a very different proposition to the ultimate McLaren two-door, and despite the best efforts of those involved, the strategy never quite gelled for the SLR. There were criticisms of the steering, ride and brakes in period. 

Nobody was more aware of these flaws than McLaren, so when SLR production had wound up and its obligations were fulfilled, it set about making a V8 hyper GT more in its mould. A more rewarding driver’s car, basically, without losing the shock and awe that made the McMerc so lovable in the first place. 

The result of that work was the MSO Edition SLR. You can read about the car in more detail here; the important work was totally overhauled suspension and steering, 20 per cent more downforce (with the airbrake recalibrated to take advantage), 50kg less weight, extra carbon and a dramatic, aero-enhanced new look. It was undeniably a spectacular creation, and also mission accomplished; the PH verdict on the ‘old dog with a few tricks’ was that ‘with MSO’s help the SLR really has come of age.’ 

There were only ever going to be 25 MSO SLRs converted; even in 2013, almost half were spoken for, so we’ll have to assume the full run was completed a while back. This one is notable as #001, the very first SLR that received the Edition treatment, and believed to be one of just six Roadsters made by MSO. There’s a fascinating story to it, even by Mercedes hypercar standards; this Roadster was registered in September 2007, but by January 2009 it was back at McLaren for some optimisation (one way to get over the shock of a financial meltdown). 

The work was pretty extensive for a car that was so new (and so valuable), including a respray, some upgrades from the 722 special edition, the suspension refresh and a sillier exhaust. Suitably impressed (or merely encouraged), that owner returned in 2010 for the wheelarch vents and extra carbon. In all, £106,831 was spent on this SLR to make it into an MSO Edition, which tallies with the 2013 PH story that said it would need more than £100k. 

Yet despite all that effort to make the SLR the best it could be - plus another respray to this grey - the Mercedes-McLaren has barely been used. It’s not even recorded 3,500 miles in almost 20 years, which seems a huge shame for a car that promises so much. You’d want to hear it, if nothing else. And see it in reflections. And watch for reactions. Back in the day, having a torque converter auto and the engine ahead were intended to make the SLR more usable than the average exotic; there’s no excuse not to, basically. 

Moreover, the time at McLaren that once would have been about a third of the value now looks like money well spent: this one is for sale at £850k, or the same as a factory 722. A far cry from their time at a quarter of that. But as has happened with so many of the SLR’s contemporaries, the market has realised that the early '00s really was about as good as it got for supercars. And the MSO Edition was easily the best SLR. Still less money than all the others, too… 


SPECIFICATION | MERCEDES-BENZ SLR ROADSTER MSO EDITION

Engine: 5,439cc V8 supercharged
Transmission: 5-speed auto, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 626@6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 575@3,250rpm
MPG: 19.5
CO2: 348g/km
Year registered: 2007
Recorded mileage: 3,140
Price new: £324,850 (standard Roadster)
Yours for: £849,950

See the original advert

Author
Discussion

CountyLines

Original Poster:

5,077 posts

29 months

Yesterday (07:29)
quotequote all
Ugly then. Ugly now.

Countdown

48,223 posts

222 months

Yesterday (07:35)
quotequote all
Don’t know if premature Alzheimer’s is setting in but I’m sure it looked nicer than that….

HTP99

24,881 posts

166 months

Yesterday (07:53)
quotequote all
Countdown said:
Don t know if premature Alzheimer s is setting in but I m sure it looked nicer than that .
The standard one looks great, this one has slightly different front and rear bodywork which ruins it.

The0bald

83 posts

141 months

Yesterday (08:04)
quotequote all
Blimey - nearly 20 years old! Fantastic car.

_Rodders_

2,445 posts

45 months

Yesterday (08:17)
quotequote all
Did these ever drop below £100k? I seem to remember them getting fairly close.


NGK210

4,746 posts

171 months

Yesterday (08:47)
quotequote all
In this instance, are we sure MSO isn’t an abbreviation of Mansory Special Order?
yuck

_Neal_

2,920 posts

245 months

Yesterday (09:05)
quotequote all
HTP99 said:
Countdown said:
Don t know if premature Alzheimer s is setting in but I m sure it looked nicer than that .
The standard one looks great, this one has slightly different front and rear bodywork which ruins it.
Agreed. Standard coupe with the turbine wheels looked superb. On this the combination of the bodywork and the dark wheels makes the rears look too small and the whole thing doesn't gel.

el romeral

2,010 posts

163 months

Yesterday (09:22)
quotequote all
The snow plough spec front spoiler is not doing it any favours.

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,640 posts

124 months

Yesterday (09:29)
quotequote all
Have MSO ever done anything tasteful?

samoht

7,092 posts

172 months

Yesterday (09:48)
quotequote all

It's still going to be big and heavy, it's still going to have that early brake-by-wire setup which has never been liked, it's still got a five-speed torque converter auto. It still lacks much interior space, and now will have a more compromised approach angle with that front lower lip. Basically, you can't redeem the car's fundamental architectural and conceptual problems by sprinkling MSO tinsel over it. Meanwhile the things that are good about it, like the sound and thrust of that M113K engine, are available elsewhere in much less compromised cars that will cost a fraction to buy and run. Or you if you want a well-resolved front-engined GT supercar, you could buy a 599...

ducnick

2,178 posts

269 months

Yesterday (09:52)
quotequote all
Got to be a tough sell. Dreadful looking things from merc’s peak poor quality era.

richinlondon

858 posts

148 months

Yesterday (10:03)
quotequote all
Proving again money and taste are often not related….

fflump

3,226 posts

64 months

Yesterday (11:04)
quotequote all
richinlondon said:
Proving again money and taste are often not related .
I don’t see what that cliche has to do with this SLR - hardly an outlandish spec. As for the price it’s clearly a rarity thing and operates in a car collector world rather than the real one.

Even at the time I felt it was a lazy design strikingly executed. An SL design of the era reimagined as a supercar. Time hasn’t changed my opinion. The slightly later SLS is of course massively cheaper but a far more classic Mercedes design.

ex-devonpaul

1,682 posts

163 months

Yesterday (15:28)
quotequote all
_Rodders_ said:
Did these ever drop below £100k? I seem to remember them getting fairly close.
I think 'standard' ones got to circa £130 for a while in the mid 2000s. I remember following one on my Ducati in about 2006 coming out of a speed restriction on the A303. I changed down ready to overtake and it made a droning noise like a WW2 bomber and buggered off into the distance.

nismo48

6,576 posts

233 months

Yesterday (15:47)
quotequote all
NGK210 said:
In this instance, are we sure MSO isn t an abbreviation of Mansory Special Order?
yuck
hehe

aka_kerrly

12,505 posts

236 months

Yesterday (15:55)
quotequote all
Not the biggest Mercedes fan here but my god that is a piece of kit. The styling for the era is on point for me, wider and a bit sharper than the standard model without being too focused on a pretend race car look.

The price, blew me away. double what i had in mind:-(

fullleather

312 posts

147 months

Yesterday (19:37)
quotequote all
This is one of those cars that reminds me of a certain movie featuring Michael Keaton, just saying...

JaredVannett

1,636 posts

169 months

Yesterday (21:52)
quotequote all
In standard guise these are beautiful but this one is a yanimize special with a drizzle of Birmingham sauce on top. vomit

LotusOmega375D

9,166 posts

179 months

Yesterday (21:54)
quotequote all
One of those cases where the convertible is less desirable than the coupe. Rather like it’s 300SL forebear. A lot of money for a barried and twice resprayed SLR convertible with no power upgrades.

Caterhamfan

362 posts

196 months

Yesterday (22:25)
quotequote all
ex-devonpaul said:
I think 'standard' ones got to circa £130 for a while in the mid 2000s. I remember following one on my Ducati in about 2006 coming out of a speed restriction on the A303. I changed down ready to overtake and it made a droning noise like a WW2 bomber and buggered off into the distance.
I remember seeing (and hearing) a standard one going up the hill at the Goodwood Festival of Speed, it sounded like a Spitfire flying by smile