John Healey resigns
Author
Discussion

dukeboy749r

Original Poster:

3,411 posts

236 months

Thursday
quotequote all
On the BBC and I’m sure other websites

Prolex-UK

5,369 posts

234 months

Thursday
quotequote all
dukeboy749r said:
On the BBC and I m sure other websites
Another nail in Starmers political coffin.

Guy is truly useless.

Other 2 are not much better though

RustyMX5

9,128 posts

243 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Pity. He almost seemed straight and honest which for an MP these days is quite an achievement.

Prolex-UK

5,369 posts

234 months

Thursday
quotequote all
RustyMX5 said:
Pity. He almost seemed straight and honest which for an MP these days is quite an achievement.
Why he did what he did .

rdjohn

7,093 posts

221 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Certainly another nail in the coffin of this Government. No point in shuffling the deck chairs on the Titanic

Ian Geary

5,474 posts

218 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Hats of to him - he has shown credibility, and stood by the principle of collective ministerial responsibility.

Whilst I am sure a lucrative role in the defence sector awaits him, it shows how hollow the labour government is about their defence rhetoric.


Of course, the country still is massively in debt, and spending way more a year than it has in income....

RustyMX5

9,128 posts

243 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Prolex-UK said:
Why he did what he did .
Oh I know. Just slightly annoyed because he, out of all the miscreants in government, seemed to be one of the better ones. To some extent he reminds me of an old Labour guy who wanted to be an MP where I lived at the time. Left wing but realised that the world isn't wired that way and compromises need to be made in order for the country to work.

JNW1

9,370 posts

220 months

Thursday
quotequote all
rdjohn said:
Certainly another nail in the coffin of this Government. No point in shuffling the deck chairs on the Titanic
How do we get rid of them before 2029 though?

They have a huge majority in Parliament so unless lots of backbench Labour MP's are going to pass a vote of no confidence in their own government and force an election - which would be akin to turkeys voting for Christmas - we're stuck with a Labour government of some description (i.e. rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic) until mid-2029. And they can do a lot more damage to the country between now and then...

AbbeyNormal

6,783 posts

184 months

Thursday
quotequote all
JNW1 said:
rdjohn said:
Certainly another nail in the coffin of this Government. No point in shuffling the deck chairs on the Titanic
How do we get rid of them before 2029 though?

They have a huge majority in Parliament so unless lots of backbench Labour MP's are going to pass a vote of no confidence in their own government and force an election - which would be akin to turkeys voting for Christmas - we're stuck with a Labour government of some description (i.e. rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic) until mid-2029. And they can do a lot more damage to the country between now and then...
five year terms.,, you can't vote them out. See previous government for further details.

abzmike

11,636 posts

132 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Whilst you can admire his principled stand in reaction to lack of a new funding settlement, how well run is his department? Procurement and spending remain out of control, the navy remain in dock, hundreds of generals and admirals shuffle paper around, whilst we try and maintain a global presence. More money is needed, but how has he actually improved the MoD?

JNW1

9,370 posts

220 months

Thursday
quotequote all
AbbeyNormal said:
JNW1 said:
rdjohn said:
Certainly another nail in the coffin of this Government. No point in shuffling the deck chairs on the Titanic
How do we get rid of them before 2029 though?

They have a huge majority in Parliament so unless lots of backbench Labour MP's are going to pass a vote of no confidence in their own government and force an election - which would be akin to turkeys voting for Christmas - we're stuck with a Labour government of some description (i.e. rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic) until mid-2029. And they can do a lot more damage to the country between now and then...
five year terms.,, you can't vote them out. See previous government for further details.
We don't have fixed five year terms - as relatively recent examples, see Theresa May, Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak going to the country early for details.

But if a government chooses to go the full five year term - and has the majority in Parliament to make that workable - then yes, we can't vote them out. Which was exactly the point I was making.

hondajack85

1,367 posts

25 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Trump wants everyone to waste money on fancy fighter jets and ships but whats the threat? You literally have to invent one to justify it all.
The money is better spent battering the enemy within that show its face in the uk like we have seen last few nights.


911Spanker

3,274 posts

42 months

Thursday
quotequote all
hondajack85 said:
Trump wants everyone to waste money on fancy fighter jets and ships but whats the threat? You literally have to invent one to justify it all.
The money is better spent battering the enemy within that show its face in the uk like we have seen last few nights.
Is this a joke?

rdjohn

7,093 posts

221 months

Thursday
quotequote all
JNW1 said:
rdjohn said:
Certainly another nail in the coffin of this Government. No point in shuffling the deck chairs on the Titanic
How do we get rid of them before 2029 though?

They have a huge majority in Parliament so unless lots of backbench Labour MP's are going to pass a vote of no confidence in their own government and force an election - which would be akin to turkeys voting for Christmas - we're stuck with a Labour government of some description (i.e. rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic) until mid-2029. And they can do a lot more damage to the country between now and then...
I suspect Burnham will want a mandate for some radical rethinking of priorities.

Otherwise we just have to wait for the ship to sink by itself.

butchstewie

65,381 posts

236 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Ian Geary said:
Hats of to him - he has shown credibility, and stood by the principle of collective ministerial responsibility.

Whilst I am sure a lucrative role in the defence sector awaits him, it shows how hollow the labour government is about their defence rhetoric.


Of course, the country still is massively in debt, and spending way more a year than it has in income....
Fair.

A 0.08% increase offered according to the BBC.

Acorn1

3,211 posts

46 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Probably the only person left in the Govt with any integrity gone.

How on earth has Starmer managed to cling to his position?

This surely has to be the last straw.

butchstewie

65,381 posts

236 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Damning.




Earthdweller

18,695 posts

152 months

Thursday
quotequote all
I know we've had defence secretaries resign before but that's been because of scandals

I can't recall one ever resigning because the Prime Minister won't fund the defence of the realm properly

Truly remarkable

Now Cairns needs to go to retain any integrity and credibility

DaveCWK

2,351 posts

200 months

Thursday
quotequote all
hondajack85 said:
Trump wants everyone to waste money on fancy fighter jets and ships but whats the threat? You literally have to invent one to justify it all.
The money is better spent battering the enemy within that show its face in the uk like we have seen last few nights.
have you been asleep under a rock lol. Russias military imperialism ongoing, no longer guarantees of USA defence in Europe...China.
UK internal strife and protests are irrelevant by comparison.

swisstoni

23,020 posts

305 months

Thursday
quotequote all
hondajack85 said:
Trump wants everyone to waste money on fancy fighter jets and ships but whats the threat? You literally have to invent one to justify it all.
The money is better spent battering the enemy within that show its face in the uk like we have seen last few nights.
Vladimir?