Flatbed scanners
Author
Discussion

.Adam.

Original Poster:

1,864 posts

289 months

Yesterday (10:06)
quotequote all
I've been using an Epson Perfection 3170 flatbed scanner for a number of years, which has just decided to give up the ghost. It appears that there isn't a modern equivalent any more, either by Epson or Canon.

Has anyone got any experience of either the Epson Perfection V39 II or the Canon CanoScan LiDE 400?

It will be used for scanning professional artwork/illustration to then put into Photoshop to work further on so quality needs to be as good as the 3170. The price point for the new scanners is quite a bit lower, but I didn't know if the technology has advanced in over 20 years making the same quality cheaper? The resolution seems to be higher on the new scanner, so I assume it should give better results?

The other option is to get a second hand Epson Perfection V600.

Edited by .Adam. on Saturday 13th June 10:45

mmm-five

12,237 posts

310 months

Yesterday (12:19)
quotequote all
Most of the big names have exited the consumer/prosumer flatbed scanner market as most home users are happy with the integrated units on the all-in-ones. Even the V39ii is getting on a bit...although I suppose scanning technology isn't that complicated to need much innovation.





The more expensive, office-oriented Workforce scanners are only 600dpi or 1200dpi and intended for document throughput speed rather the 4800dpi of the photo-oriented models.

I've been using all-in-one photo printers since I swapped out my Stylus Photo R2400 and Perfection 4180 when I was doing much less scanning at home - which had replaced ageing A2 Stylus Color 3000 and GT15000 scanner.

Currently using a (1200x4800) ET-8550 all-in-one, which suits my current basic needs (i.e. no slide/film or colour-critical scanning anymore)...but even thought it's a premium-priced printer, it comes with a cheaper consumer LED/CIS scanner, not a prosumer CCD scanner.

Edited by mmm-five on Saturday 13th June 12:25

dapprman

2,741 posts

293 months

Yesterday (13:04)
quotequote all
I've been using a Canon LiDe 400 for a few years now and it's been a good scanner, though slow if I've wanted to use a very high resolution. I do not use the Canon software so no clue what's like, as I've been using VueScan for years. How good it is at top resolutions alas I can not say.

Mr Pointy

13,079 posts

185 months

Yesterday (13:08)
quotequote all
How about a NoS CanonScan 9000F?

.Adam.

Original Poster:

1,864 posts

289 months

Yesterday (13:38)
quotequote all
I use a 9000f at work, so that's a possibility.