RE: Lamborghini Countach 25th Anniversary | Spotted
RE: Lamborghini Countach 25th Anniversary | Spotted
Yesterday

Lamborghini Countach 25th Anniversary | Spotted

One of the very last Countachs ever made - one of the very lowest mileage, too


There are some cars that everybody knows. Doesn’t matter if they don’t know where their dipstick is or when their tyres were changed, they’ll know some cars. You know the thing: a 911, a Mini, a Beetle, a Range Rover, the Ford Fiesta. The icons big and small. And there’s one more we’d add to that list: the Lamborghini Countach.

Alright, maybe not everybody would know it’s a Countach. But they’d know it was a Lamborghini. After the relatively dainty Miura this was the car that really established Lambo as the purveyor of mad, bad, unabashed supercars. Doesn’t matter if you know the Countach from Wolf of Wall Street, from Top Gear, or from car magazines. Everyone knows a Countach. Everyone, by and large, loves a Countach as well. 

Its significance in the Lamborghini story is now being reflected in values. Supercars this wild, with manual gearboxes and nat-asp V12s and tyres as wide as they are tall, won’t happen again. If you’re 50 now, you were born at the same sort of time as a Countach; if you’re mid-30s you were born at the end of production. This is still the supercar for a lot of people, because it was on sale for so long (Lambo couldn’t replace it until the Chrysler cash), and now there’s a clamour for the best ones.

The early, very pretty Periscopos have been in demand for a while, but now they all are. As this is PH, you’ll probably know it as a 25th Anniversary, launched in 1988 to mark Lambo’s quarter century. For a while derided as the Countach that jumped the shark, all spoilers and silliness, it’s now being viewed in a slightly different light. Not just because Horacio Pagani worked on the composite bits and Sandro Munari helped on the chassis. But because the best Lamborghinis always come at the end of the production run; late Huracans and Aventadors even were very different beasts from the first ones. So with all the learnings from QV, 5000 S and so on, this should be the best of the bunch.

Especially as it’s barely been used. As a 1990 car, it’s one of the very last Countaches to leave Sant’Agata; the very final one, driven on PH in 2022, was chassis 12085 - this is 12031.Though ordered new in the UK, this Countach spent the first quarter century of its life in Japan, where it covered just a few hundred kilometres. Since then, and in the UK, it’s had just two more owners and not very much more driving. So here we have an unrestored Countach with barely 1,000 miles on it. Even by Lamborghini standards, that makes it a very special thing. 

Crucially, too, money has been spent in recent years, so hopefully the stuff that can seize up through little use is in good order. To this day nothing will quite draw a crowd like a Countach, especially a red one. And if LHD is a bit scary for the UK, it makes this one perfect for a European road trip. The ideal thing for a factory visit, perhaps…  


SPECIFICATION | LAMBORGHINI COUNTACH 25TH ANNIVERSARY

Engine: 5,167cc, V12
Transmission: 5-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 455@7,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 369@5,200rpm
MPG: 12.6mpg
CO2: Lots!
Year registered: 1990
Recorded mileage: 1,791km
Price new: c. £90,000
Yours for: £575,000

See the original advert

Author
Discussion

Ray_Aber

Original Poster:

831 posts

302 months

I've never been a fan of the Anniversary model - too much additional plastic tat around the sills, and an excess of strakes. I'd much rather have the QV from 1985, which I was lucky enough to drive (on private roads - I was only 17!) and be driven in (Perthshire to London in, err, 4.5 hours...)

Of interest is the price. I was expecting £750k+. I know that prices of classics are softening, but I had always thought that this was confined to cars from the 60s and older. Clearly not.

Last point on this car - I wish it was the classic cream leather inside, rather than the black.

edo111s

229 posts

251 months

the original advert says POA ...

FlukePlay

1,169 posts

171 months

Ray_Aber said:
I've never been a fan of the Anniversary model - too much additional plastic tat around the sills, and an excess of strakes. I'd much rather have the QV from 1985, which I was lucky enough to drive (on private roads - I was only 17!) and be driven in (Perthshire to London in, err, 4.5 hours...)

Of interest is the price. I was expecting £750k+. I know that prices of classics are softening, but I had always thought that this was confined to cars from the 60s and older. Clearly not.

Last point on this car - I wish it was the classic cream leather inside, rather than the black.
Yep, the Anniversary was always the least desirable (IMO) of all the Countach models and pricing remained well below the others for quite some time. Yep, the QV is the one to have but not the 1988½ with the overstyled sills/side skirts.

My ideal spec:


mooseracer

2,705 posts

196 months

Sorry to say these have never done it for me - even back in period.
I do love the silliness of Lambos though thumbup

thegreenhell

22,685 posts

245 months

Even the least desirable Countach is infinitely more desirable than the latest Timmy Aero thing.

Time for another listen to this. What a time for supercars that was.


CountyLines

5,139 posts

29 months

Still The Boss after all these years.

Puddenchucker

5,590 posts

244 months

J4CKO

46,372 posts

226 months

Its funny in period, they got better with each version, but now it seems the other way round with the original being the prettiest and this being the least appealing. It was the time of shoulder pads and excess I guess.


FPC

96 posts

77 months

FlukePlay said:
Ray_Aber said:
I've never been a fan of the Anniversary model - too much additional plastic tat around the sills, and an excess of strakes. I'd much rather have the QV from 1985, which I was lucky enough to drive (on private roads - I was only 17!) and be driven in (Perthshire to London in, err, 4.5 hours...)

Of interest is the price. I was expecting £750k+. I know that prices of classics are softening, but I had always thought that this was confined to cars from the 60s and older. Clearly not.

Last point on this car - I wish it was the classic cream leather inside, rather than the black.
Yep, the Anniversary was always the least desirable (IMO) of all the Countach models and pricing remained well below the others for quite some time. Yep, the QV is the one to have but not the 1988½ with the overstyled sills/side skirts.

My ideal spec:

Still a bit narsty but not as bad as 25th anniversary. Got to be LP400 - just stunning

WPA

14,268 posts

140 months

Body kit was too heavy handed on these, always preferred the QV

Ray_Aber

Original Poster:

831 posts

302 months

Yes, the LP400 was the purest, but the LP400S and 500S (and 5000QV) were the ones on the posters on the walls of many teenage boys and undergraduate students. Good times!

blistacompact

161 posts

29 months

Now I find the design of the countach unbalanced. Without the spoiler It lacks something, with the massive thing it's gaudy.
That 25 anniversary version makes you question the taste of horacio pagani. I love the 80s but this is a good example of the dubious fashion trends of those days.

Arsecati

2,749 posts

143 months

Only car that adorned my bedroom walls back in the 80's - and I'd still take this one too (though as others have said, the more unadorned QV would be the pick). Near identical one on AT at moment for £490k: it has 24k miles (nowt wrong with that!), but RHD - definitely worth the saving over this one.

Red6

625 posts

82 months

Anniversary is a pig.

Give me a lp5000QV sans wings and spoilers

kambites

71,066 posts

247 months

FPC said:
Still a bit narsty but not as bad as 25th anniversary. Got to be LP400 - just stunning
I agree. I'm sure the later cars were objectively far better, but subjectively it'd have to be the LP400 for me. smile

cerb4.5lee

42,813 posts

206 months

FlukePlay said:
Ray_Aber said:
I've never been a fan of the Anniversary model - too much additional plastic tat around the sills, and an excess of strakes. I'd much rather have the QV from 1985, which I was lucky enough to drive (on private roads - I was only 17!) and be driven in (Perthshire to London in, err, 4.5 hours...)

Of interest is the price. I was expecting £750k+. I know that prices of classics are softening, but I had always thought that this was confined to cars from the 60s and older. Clearly not.

Last point on this car - I wish it was the classic cream leather inside, rather than the black.
Yep, the Anniversary was always the least desirable (IMO) of all the Countach models and pricing remained well below the others for quite some time. Yep, the QV is the one to have but not the 1988½ with the overstyled sills/side skirts.

My ideal spec:

My ideal spec too. thumbup

SE2

447 posts

162 months

Solid red does the Anniversary no favours. Nicer in silver metallic.

TheMilkyBarKid

855 posts

55 months

kambites said:
FPC said:
Still a bit narsty but not as bad as 25th anniversary. Got to be LP400 - just stunning
I agree. I'm sure the later cars were objectively far better, but subjectively it'd have to be the LP400 for me. smile
Yep me three. I’ve always thought the Anniversary was horrible, the LP400 just looks perfect to me.

80sMatchbox

3,988 posts

202 months

With such low mileage, I do wonder if this is the correct price. There are others for sale at a higher [prices with much higher mileage than this car.

I too never liked the Anniversary car with all the extra tat, that seems to be there just to differentiate it from the earlier cars, not to make it better as such.

That said, there is an orange one around London that never fails to draw a crowd and with every passing year, I'm less critical of the Anniversary design now. Sure, if you ever parked next to an earlier car it would be outshone..but how oftern do you ever see 2 Countaches together?biggrin



Mr Tidy

30,386 posts

153 months

I'll confess, I never liked the looks of the Countach. getmecoat