RE: Jaguar XK8 | Spotted
RE: Jaguar XK8 | Spotted
Yesterday

Jaguar XK8 | Spotted

What does a 30-year-old classic Jag look like these days? Here we go...


Think of V8-powered Jaguar sports cars and probably the F-Type is the one that comes to mind first. It’s the most recent, of course, as well as being much missed. But on top of that there was the sheer variety of 5.0-litres on offer, the likeability of all of them, and the fact that they’ve always represented such good value - both new and used. 

They’re fantastic, basically, but this time round we’re going to consider its XK predecessor; less overt, less rowdy, but still with V8 charm aplenty and an undeniable significance. This was the car that replaced the XJS in 1996 (so yes, 30 years ago), when Jaguar desperately needed a shot in the arm to rejuvenate its image. This was pre-S-Type, with the range solely comprised of XJ saloon and 20-year-old XJS. So a proper halo was really needed, and the XK duly delivered: suave, stylish and desirable (despite sharing some XJS bits under the skin), it was exactly the kind of new V8 two-door that was required. 

You know how the story went from there: more variants, more special editions, a reliability concern or two, then the X150 to replace the X100 a decade later and usefully modernise the XK throughout. And while still remarkably affordable in the main, the era of unbelievable bargains appears to be done; as was the case with the XJS, the cheap and cheerful days saw many written off thanks to a hefty repair bill. Now they’re starting to be recognised and appreciated a little more, interest seems likely to rise. 

What was sometimes suggested as the more stylish, better-sounding, cheaper alternative to the supercharged Aston DB7 still looks like it today. Presentable Jaguar V8 coupes from £5,000 surely can’t hang around forever. At the other end of the scale is this one, selected on account of its mileage (just 17,000), and its vintage: as a 1997 car it’s 30 years old next year. This is now the classic Jag drop top; rather good it looks, too. 

As an early one, it’s powered by the unsupercharged 4.0-litre V8, with around 300hp, but that sounds more than enough to woofle around the lanes with the roof down. First registered on the Isle of Man, it appears to have lived a very gentle life, and after a period of storage made it to the mainland in 2019. Since then use has been sparing to say the least, and it now presents as probably the best an XK8 can get. Which is actually quite an appealing prospect, truth be told. 

Look where it’s for sale, finally: Jaguar Land Rover Classic. In there with the restomod Defenders, an XJ220, Series Land Rovers, E-Types, an XK150… the very best of Jaguar and Land Rover over the years. If an XK8 is good enough for them, it’s more than good enough for us. Don’t be surprised if £25k isn’t the price ceiling for long.


SPECIFICATION | JAGUAR XK8 CONVERTIBLE

Engine: 3,996cc, V8
Transmission: 5-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 290@6,100rpm
Torque (lb ft): 290@4,250rpm
MPG: 24.8
CO2: 279g/km
Recorded mileage: 17,063
Year registered: 1997
Price new: £56,850
Price now: £24,950

See the original advert

Author
Discussion

pb8g09

Original Poster:

3,121 posts

95 months

Yesterday (07:13)
quotequote all
Drove past one of these being driven with venom on Saturday and it looked far better than I remembered. Not sure I’d be dropping this amount of money on an old Jag though.

Robertb

3,670 posts

264 months

Yesterday (07:17)
quotequote all
Rather nostalgic. I had a 4.0 coupe in 1998, was a lovey car, a cabrio would be a very pleasant way to travel on high days and holidays, ideal for long distance touring.

Premium price, but for what looks a great example from Jaguar Classic this doesn’t seem outrageous as the usual gotchas such as subframe should be fine.

There was of course the sticky issue of cylinder linings in the 4.0 cars.

NDA

25,244 posts

251 months

Yesterday (07:18)
quotequote all
I bought a new one of these - although the supercharged version. Great cars at the time - comfortable and quick.

Jazoli

9,576 posts

276 months

Yesterday (07:19)
quotequote all
Nice, I owned one briefly and it was ok, it felt very dated and was incredibly cramped for the size of the car, V8 was nice as it’d had the rear boxes ‘deleted’ but it suffered from flakey electrics and corrosion was setting in everywhere.

I did think about trading up to an XKR but the sensible part of my brain said no!

Classy looking thing



HTP99

24,909 posts

166 months

Yesterday (07:24)
quotequote all
Could never put my finger on it but I've always thought that these just don't look quite right at the front.

Huzzah

28,794 posts

209 months

Yesterday (07:46)
quotequote all
I'd have one like a shot, except it's need rear seats. Not this one though, it's a collectors car rather than a daily.

NJJ

515 posts

106 months

Yesterday (08:25)
quotequote all
I have a soft spot for these as I used to wash them as part of my then dream Saturday job as a 14 year old. I remember sitting in the driver's seat and starting them just to hear the growl of the super smooth V8. Promising myself that one day I'd have one. As I've matured, I think they can look a little 90s dumpy and I'd now rather have a later X150 model. But if you see a cherished one such as this they still look a classy thing. Needs to be finished in a better exterior colour though.

Lotobear

8,845 posts

154 months

Yesterday (08:29)
quotequote all
Not a bad looking car on the outside but I just think the interiors, dash in particular, looks so st and dated (it was dated when they first came out)

Black S2K

1,852 posts

275 months

Yesterday (08:40)
quotequote all
HTP99 said:
Could never put my finger on it but I've always thought that these just don't look quite right at the front.
Front bumper's a bit too flat in plan view.

Could've done with a bit more E-Type curve, but then the overhang was long enough already and they needed a big air intake for the supercharged ones.

Still looked a million times more beautiful than the XJS in its day.


Keith-9fc7j

87 posts

7 months

Yesterday (08:40)
quotequote all
You’d need rocks in your head to pay nearly £25k for that. Im staggered these are even into the 5 figure prices.

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,650 posts

124 months

Yesterday (08:43)
quotequote all
I had an XKR coupe from new for a year back in the day. Great for driving long distances in comfort but didn't like to be hussled - the front wheels always felt like they were a very long way away and only distantly in touch with the steering wheel. Dash was lousy ( as was a/c ) but the rest of the interior nice. I can see the appeal for those who want a wafting classic but just remember it is not a sports car.

J4CKO

46,379 posts

226 months

Yesterday (08:50)
quotequote all
Bet thats cheaper in the long run than ending up too deep into a ropey one, looks perfect and a colour that doesnt ruin it like some of the wishy washy ones they came in.

For me though, the X150 existing rules these out, 25 grand gets you a very nice one, 5.0 or XKR.


Turbobanana

8,158 posts

227 months

Yesterday (08:51)
quotequote all
PH said:
...the cheap and cheerful days saw many written off thanks to a hefty repair bill...
This is true.

A friend of mine is one of those IT bods that can dictate how much he earns by how hard he wants to work. He had one of these when he was single. He met someone, got married and had a kid. The Jaguar was put into his parents' barn in immaculate condition about 15 years ago.

After lockdown his wife decided to resurrect it in time for his 50th birthday. The barn was a good, dry one on a working farm with plenty of airflow and a relatively stable temperature. Even so, the amount of welding the thing needed was eye-watering. His wife was committed to the project and went ahead with it, even though she acknowledges that she could have bought another one for less money than the restoration bill. It's still not concourse, but is a pleasant way to get about the countryside provided the oh-so-90s immobiliser is playing nicely, which it does when it wants to.

Personally I've never really liked the shape of these, but I'm not sure why. I think it's because the tail sits too high - the coupe hides it better.

AnonSA

53 posts

32 months

Yesterday (08:57)
quotequote all
Having fairly extensive experience with both, an XK8 is in my humble opinion, a better car than an early 6 Cylinder DB7.

hammo19

7,403 posts

222 months

Yesterday (08:59)
quotequote all
Sorry but can’t get beyond that awful gear stick and knob.

smilo996

3,678 posts

196 months

Yesterday (09:34)
quotequote all
It's no F but it is a Jaaag. Rather nice. Dynamically defo a Jaag, not much good it pushed hard but fine for mooching out. Hired on in the South of France, perfect.
That gear knob needs to be changed.

cerb4.5lee

42,873 posts

206 months

Yesterday (09:36)
quotequote all
BigChiefmuffinAgain said:
I had an XKR coupe from new for a year back in the day. Great for driving long distances in comfort but didn't like to be hussled - the front wheels always felt like they were a very long way away and only distantly in touch with the steering wheel. Dash was lousy ( as was a/c ) but the rest of the interior nice. I can see the appeal for those who want a wafting classic but just remember it is not a sports car.
I will always remember being behind an XKR years back, he booted it and it went off like a rocket, and I've been impressed ever since.

NDA

25,244 posts

251 months

Yesterday (09:39)
quotequote all

Wet and dry.


GeniusOfLove

5,262 posts

38 months

Yesterday (09:48)
quotequote all
AnonSA said:
Having fairly extensive experience with both, an XK8 is in my humble opinion, a better car than an early 6 Cylinder DB7.
Likewise and likewise.

The DB7 is much prettier, the XK8 looks substantially larger and flabbier and the rear end in particular is not nearly so well resolved, but as a car to actually use the XK8 is far superior, but these aren't bought on objective merit now it's all about what the car means to you so the huge superiority of the followup X150 XK isn't really relevant to anyone looking at this old beast any more than it is to the buyer of an E Type or XJS.

I think the DB7 is much prettier than the XK8, which is rather more bloated and less delicate, the rear quarter in particular is a triumph on the DB7 and a bit of a dogs dinner on the XK8, the Jaguar had to be designed with a mind to practicality and much higher volume production techniques though.

Quhet

2,854 posts

172 months

Yesterday (09:53)
quotequote all
Mad that these are now approaching 30. I always thought the later facelifted XKRs looked great, especially in that green on the Die Another Day car yum