Migrant careworkers bring in dozens of family members in...
Migrant careworkers bring in dozens of family members in...
Author
Discussion

Legacywr

Original Poster:

15,641 posts

217 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
Migrant Care workers bring in dozens of family members into the UK, despite new rules.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2225958/migrant-...

Shouldn't this be the headlines and not Trump and the World Cup?

Edited by Legacywr on Wednesday 8th July 12:19

Eric Mc

125,609 posts

294 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
Bing -



Edited by Eric Mc on Wednesday 8th July 11:48

Countdown

49,372 posts

225 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
Legacywr said:
Migrant Care workers bing in dozens of family members into the UK, despite new rules.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2225958/migrant-...

Shouldn't this be the headlines and not Trump and the World Cup?
There's no evidence that workers are bringing in dozens of family members. As the article says some/most/all of the family visas may be for previous arrivals.

That being said I thought there were income requirements in order to be able to sponsor somebody (£29,000 per annum?). Also they're not entitled to any benefits AIUI

Legacywr

Original Poster:

15,641 posts

217 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Bing -



Edited by Eric Mc on Wednesday 8th July 11:48
biggrin

911Spanker

3,642 posts

45 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
Legacywr said:
Migrant Care workers bring in dozens of family members into the UK, despite new rules.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2225958/migrant-...

Shouldn't this be the headlines and not Trump and the World Cup?

Edited by Legacywr on Wednesday 8th July 12:19
Zzzzzz

Rusty Old-Banger

7,662 posts

242 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
Moaning about Trump is more fashionable/favourable/less likely to get you marked as "OmG WaciST!!"

iphonedyou

10,413 posts

186 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
Why would Trump and the World Cup not make headlines?

Weird.

finlo

4,453 posts

232 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
Also they're not entitled to any benefits AIUI
[/quote]

Of course they don't, everyone knows the only reason they come Is for the weather!

JagLover

46,753 posts

264 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
Countdown said:
That being said I thought there were income requirements in order to be able to sponsor somebody (£29,000 per annum?). Also they're not entitled to any benefits AIUI
Until they get ILR at which point they will become fully entitled.

The Home Secretary is trying to delay this but facing a great deal of opposition from the rest of her party.

Countdown

49,372 posts

225 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Countdown said:
That being said I thought there were income requirements in order to be able to sponsor somebody (£29,000 per annum?). Also they're not entitled to any benefits AIUI
Until they get ILR at which point they will become fully entitled.

The Home Secretary is trying to delay this but facing a great deal of opposition from the rest of her party.
AIUI it takes a minimum of 5 years of continuous employment before they can apply for ILR (so it's not a case of landing at Heathrow and then rocking up at the benefits office)

I agree with extending the 5 year threshold, maybe to 15 years.

Murph7355

41,968 posts

285 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
Countdown said:
JagLover said:
Countdown said:
That being said I thought there were income requirements in order to be able to sponsor somebody (£29,000 per annum?). Also they're not entitled to any benefits AIUI
Until they get ILR at which point they will become fully entitled.

The Home Secretary is trying to delay this but facing a great deal of opposition from the rest of her party.
AIUI it takes a minimum of 5 years of continuous employment before they can apply for ILR (so it's not a case of landing at Heathrow and then rocking up at the benefits office)

I agree with extending the 5 year threshold, maybe to 15 years.
It would probably be wise not to put a definitive marker on it.

A "minimum of" would be sensible, but the rest could probably be dependent on other factors being met (earnings etc).

Countdown

49,372 posts

225 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
It would probably be wise not to put a definitive marker on it.

A "minimum of" would be sensible, but the rest could probably be dependent on other factors being met (earnings etc).
Seems fair.

The fascist in me thinks countries like the UAE have a great system (You work and then you leave). The liberal in me thinks "If youve paid your taxes for 10+ years and done a job that nobody else could or wanted to then maybe you're entitled to live here in your old age"

nickfrog

25,322 posts

246 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
Article said:
Just 12 health and care visas were issued to workers from Cameroon last year but a total of 180 visas were issued to family members from the same country in the year to March.
The 180 family members are not necessarily related to the (much needed) 12 care/health workers.

A bad faith and populist conflation from the Express to catch the intelectually challenged average "patriot".



TTwiggy

11,884 posts

233 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
Would this not be filed under another 'Brexit win'? AKAIK EU migrant workers were far less likely to bring family over with them.

LARK F1 GTR

4,574 posts

175 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
finlo said:
Of course they don't, everyone knows the only reason they come Is for the weather!
Lol!!! That's actually what a Labour bloke said on a video I saw last night about the boat lot! He was on GB News talking to Michelle Dewberry and that's what he opened with. He said it and she wasn't having any of it!

S600BSB

8,354 posts

135 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
Legacywr said:
Migrant Care workers bring in dozens of family members into the UK, despite new rules.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2225958/migrant-...

Shouldn't this be the headlines and not Trump and the World Cup?

Edited by Legacywr on Wednesday 8th July 12:19
Stupid article in the Express. Best advise is to get your news from another, more reliable, feed.

119

19,884 posts

65 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
S600BSB said:
Legacywr said:
Migrant Care workers bring in dozens of family members into the UK, despite new rules.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2225958/migrant-...

Shouldn't this be the headlines and not Trump and the World Cup?

Edited by Legacywr on Wednesday 8th July 12:19
Stupid article in the Express. Best advise is to get your news from another, more reliable, feed.
What feeds do you recommend?

Warhavernet

1,486 posts

16 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
With a local care home charging £2200 per week for bed and board someone is trousering mega-bucks, perhaps there would be no need to sponsor Cameroonians, their meemaws and in-laws if they advertised locally for full-time care workers and paid a decent hourly rate.

nickfrog

25,322 posts

246 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
119 said:
What feeds do you recommend?
Clearly anything but the Express. Did you read the article and identify the conflation or did you just jump to the conclusion they wanted you to reach?

21TonyK

13,291 posts

238 months

Wednesday 8th July
quotequote all
Warhavernet said:
With a local care home charging £2200 per week for bed and board someone is trousering mega-bucks, perhaps there would be no need to sponsor Cameroonians, their meemaws and in-laws if they advertised locally for full-time care workers and paid a decent hourly rate.
I'm guessing 2200 pw must be nursing care. And yes, some do make mega-bucks.

The company I worked for sold for £5.2Bn (yes Billion).