Another good reason to keep your belt on.
Another good reason to keep your belt on.
Author
Discussion

Jim H

Original Poster:

1,735 posts

218 months

Dave Hedgehog

16,300 posts

233 months

Friday 10th July
quotequote all
you just need to hold on for under a second for the pressure to stabilise in the event of a window blowout

mythbusters confirmed this

CountyLines

5,920 posts

32 months

Friday 10th July
quotequote all
Tell that to the hanging out the window.

48k

17,334 posts

177 months

Friday 10th July
quotequote all
This could have been so much worse. Catastrophic engine failure, fan blade detatching punching through the nacelle and debris impacting the fuselage breaking the window.



Video of the damage - https://x.com/_stavmat/status/2075597900868997609

limmy01

263 posts

163 months

Friday 10th July
quotequote all
Seat belt wouldn't do nothing if you were in the window seat, your heads still getting sucked out

Huzzah

28,935 posts

212 months

Friday 10th July
quotequote all
How much extra do Ryanair charge for opening windows?

borcy

12,379 posts

85 months

Friday 10th July
quotequote all
Looks like its cracked right at the root of the blade. The damage looks pretty low compared to what might have happened.

Furbo

3,983 posts

61 months

Tuesday 14th July
quotequote all

It wasn't long ago that O'Leary was proposing that being sucked off, when Flying Ryanair, was going to be introduced as a cost option.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfIY24BErBE

craig1912

4,619 posts

141 months

Tuesday 14th July
quotequote all
He was wearing a seat belt

Jim H

Original Poster:

1,735 posts

218 months

Tuesday 14th July
quotequote all
craig1912 said:
He was wearing a seat belt
Yeah, there is more emerging about this incident.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/l0058lqf/man...

As ever, Juan gives his comprehensive take on things here.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RlIO_91ceoQ&pp=y...

As 48 K has already mentioned, it could have been so much worse.




Crumpet

5,373 posts

209 months

Wednesday 15th July
quotequote all
Was this kind of thing common back in the day when engines were nowhere near as reliable?

Furbo

3,983 posts

61 months

Wednesday 15th July
quotequote all
Has there been any mention of how much Ryanair charged for the oxygen and whether it was necessary to pre-book?


Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Wednesday 15th July
quotequote all
Crumpet said:
Was this kind of thing common back in the day when engines were nowhere near as reliable?
Earlier jet engines didn't have such large fans - some had none (pure turbojets).

So fan failure was rarer on engines with much smaller fan assemblies at the front - or no fans at all.

The other factor is that there just so many airliners flying around today compared to the 80s and earlier.

When the 727 production line ended, just over 1,800 had been built - and that was a record for a jet airliner at the time.

Now we have production runs for some airliners of over 10,000 - such as the later variant 737s and the Airbus A320 family (all of which feature high bypass large fan turbofan engines).

s2000db

1,414 posts

182 months

Wednesday 15th July
quotequote all
Aren’t jet engines designed to contain all the debris from a fan blade failure?
Looks like a design or build failure then..

Krikkit

27,935 posts

210 months

Wednesday 15th July
quotequote all
s2000db said:
Aren t jet engines designed to contain all the debris from a fan blade failure?
Looks like a design or build failure then..
Yes, but nothing's perfect. There will be many questions and deep analysis of exactly what's gone on.

JoshSm

4,923 posts

66 months

Wednesday 15th July
quotequote all
s2000db said:
Aren t jet engines designed to contain all the debris from a fan blade failure?
Looks like a design or build failure then..
They are, though looking at that the bits were retained from the initial failure, then rattled around and got spat out forward instead through the non armoured part.