Airline charging for ..... sitting family together
Discussion
nordboy said:
Why don't either you or your wife sit in the individual seat and your daughter then sits next to one of you?
You don't have to sit in exactly the allocated seat, as long as you're in one your family party has bought?
If you were to be the pedant, - that would not work as you have to sit in the allocated seats of course 'for safety' Mr Airline.You don't have to sit in exactly the allocated seat, as long as you're in one your family party has bought?
Sure and of course it is simply bad luck that of the three that got split it was the child....
Do you not actually see it as intentional gouging by doing so ?
PushedDover said:
nordboy said:
Why don't either you or your wife sit in the individual seat and your daughter then sits next to one of you?
You don't have to sit in exactly the allocated seat, as long as you're in one your family party has bought?
If you were to be the pedant, - that would not work as you have to sit in the allocated seats of course 'for safety' Mr Airline.You don't have to sit in exactly the allocated seat, as long as you're in one your family party has bought?
Sure and of course it is simply bad luck that of the three that got split it was the child....
Do you not actually see it as intentional gouging by doing so ?
Budget airline in price gouging shocker? They literally charge you for everything these days, so I'm not that surprised tbh. I guess there's a choice, but it probably means paying a bit more money?
bennno said:
Mr E said:
We have a 13 hour flight coming up and at the moment they ve sat my 14 year old away from us.
I don t know who s happier, him or me.
Why wouldn t you book seats together?I don t know who s happier, him or me.
Airlines split families up to squeeze more
So, why wouldn’t Mr E book seats together ? Because it costs more might be a starting point in the conversation
Mr E said:
We have a 13 hour flight coming up and at the moment they ve sat my 14 year old away from us.
I don t know who s happier, him or me.
On a short flight, because it’s not a service/feature that appears good value. I don t know who s happier, him or me.
On this one, it wasn’t an option apparently.
I suspect very much they’ll offer nearer/at check-in. I suspect we’ll refuse and they’ll sit us together anyway.
nordboy said:
Can't remember ever having an issue with not sitting in specific allocated seats? Often been on less busy flights where I've moved many rows to have 2/3 seats on my own. And no ones ever bothered.
Budget airline in price gouging shocker? They literally charge you for everything these days, so I'm not that surprised tbh. I guess there's a choice, but it probably means paying a bit more money?
Very much a non budget Holiday (Neilson Active Holidays) pick Jet2 for this flight in the AI package.Budget airline in price gouging shocker? They literally charge you for everything these days, so I'm not that surprised tbh. I guess there's a choice, but it probably means paying a bit more money?
Jet2 are the miserable here, not the inferred cheapness of the passengers
I have no problem at all with either me or partner not sitting next to our children. I'd rather have lower fares tbh, and pay for precisely the elements of the trip I'd value.
If the airline takes the decision to not sit us together, it's on them.
O'Leary has a point when he said "if I could make the fares free, I would".
If the airline takes the decision to not sit us together, it's on them.
O'Leary has a point when he said "if I could make the fares free, I would".
Boz123 said:
I have no problem at all with either me or partner not sitting next to our children. I'd rather have lower fares tbh, and pay for precisely the elements of the trip I'd value.
If the airline takes the decision to not sit us together, it's on them.
O'Leary has a point when he said "if I could make the fares free, I would".
No issue with this either if it was not feasible, and asking for special priveleges suh as Exit seats etc.If the airline takes the decision to not sit us together, it's on them.
O'Leary has a point when he said "if I could make the fares free, I would".
but to remove a 13yr old from the travel group to sit on own ?
does that seem 'right' when plenty of seats where all three can seat are available?
It's just an extra tax. I'm surprised more don't do it. Similar to the stupid and annoying baggage rules where some don't allow any carry on other than a tiny bag, just to charge more
I think deliberately placing people apart in the same booking is unethical personally. It's just a really s
tty thing to do
I think deliberately placing people apart in the same booking is unethical personally. It's just a really s
tty thing to do Boz123 said:
I have no problem at all with either me or partner not sitting next to our children. I'd rather have lower fares tbh, and pay for precisely the elements of the trip I'd value.
If the airline takes the decision to not sit us together, it's on them.
O'Leary has a point when he said "if I could make the fares free, I would".
Same here. If the airline takes the decision to not sit us together, it's on them.
O'Leary has a point when he said "if I could make the fares free, I would".
Often here people complaining their bag was extra or the seat allocation or their xyz.
I don’t want any of those things. So I pay only for what I need, an unallocated seat. Means I pay the very base price. Given I fly back and forward sometimes a few times a month, that means for me £30 or so each way and I can afford to do it. I couldn’t afford to do it if it meant sponsoring everyone else to bring a bag or choose a seat or have a free meal onboard or whatever additions many might like but I don’t need and don’t want to contribute to them being ‘free’ for everyone else.
PushedDover said:
Seems lots of threads on the Airlines charging...
Checking in for a Neilson Holiday using Jet2 , for self and wife, and 13yr old daughter.
Plenty rows of three available for 'pre-allocated' seating.
but to rinse £55 out of us, they place my 13yr old on her own
Utter t
ts trick and shame on Jet2 w
kers.
It is cheaper not to sit with your teenage children and you are complaining and calling them names?Checking in for a Neilson Holiday using Jet2 , for self and wife, and 13yr old daughter.
Plenty rows of three available for 'pre-allocated' seating.
but to rinse £55 out of us, they place my 13yr old on her own
Utter t
ts trick and shame on Jet2 w
kers.redrabbit29 said:
It's just an extra tax. I'm surprised more don't do it. Similar to the stupid and annoying baggage rules where some don't allow any carry on other than a tiny bag, just to charge more
I think deliberately placing people apart in the same booking is unethical personally. It's just a really s
tty thing to do
Yes it is a really sh***y thing to do but unfortunately that's the game to screw down the headline fare cost as much as possible. For us customers the game is to enforce our consumer rights as much as possible (delay compensation etc etc). I think deliberately placing people apart in the same booking is unethical personally. It's just a really s
tty thing to do Appreciate particularly poor when it's booked as part of a package though.
Budget airlines are a bus with wings. You wouldn't jump on a bus and expect to all get a seat next to each other. If you want that, book an Uber. You sit where they put you. If you all want to sit together, then you pay for it. Just because seats together are free now, they might not be further down the line.
Gassing Station | Holidays & Travel | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


