RE: Mercedes CLS320 CDI | Shed of the Week
RE: Mercedes CLS320 CDI | Shed of the Week
Yesterday

Mercedes CLS320 CDI | Shed of the Week

Second time the charm for the Merc's shapely four-door coupe?


A gentle wander into Rarity Corner this week with only the second appearance in this area of the PH homepage of Mercedes’s banana-shaped CLS. The C219 generation made its debut at the 2003 Frankfurt show as a swoopy four-seat alternative to the shorter, narrower, taller and staider (?) W211 E-Class saloon. When it went on sale in 2004 most said it was the world’s first 4-door coupe, but Shed isn’t betting against someone on the forum kindly reminding us all of the Buxom Motor Co’s Hansom Flatley Laundalette of 1908.

Back in more modern times, Jaguar’s sprightly, sharp-handling XF of 2007 bit into CLS sales but Mercedes still managed to flog 170,000 C219s between 2004 and 2010. They had the last laugh over Jaguar, too, because the CLS kept going through two more generations before finally getting the bum’s rush in 2023, eight years after the XF was shuffled off the scene.

The last (and up to this point only) CLS to appear in SOTW nearly three years ago now was a ’57 plate 101,000-miler, also in silver like today’s shed but upholstered in grey leather rather than black, and wearing AMG wheels that were worth £750 on their own. That car looked like good value at £2,000 despite an issue described as ‘sometimes goes into limp mode’. 

At the time PH forum used car guru Psycosis thought it might be a problem with the inlet port shutoff motor, something Shed wishes he could fit to Mrs Shed whenever she gets up for the fourth time at the all-you-can-eat curry house. We can’t tell you for sure if the limping on that CLS was ever fixed, but the Gov’s MOT history check no longer recognises its reg number, so draw your own conclusions. 

Coincidentally, today’s 119,000-mile CLS also has something weird going on with its reg number. For some reason, it has a ’53 plate on it even though it was first registered in April 2008. Shed has been trying to read some personal-plate value into PW53 CKS. By screwing up his eyes and tilting his wispy old bonce to one side he managed to come up with ‘pillocks’, but that seems like an odd word to immortalise on both ends of your motor. His only other guess is that it was an attempt to tie the number in with the ‘CLS’ model name somehow, but things went wrong in the application process and the owner couldn’t be bothered to rectify it. 

Anyway, like that earlier C219, today’s is powered by the 2005-22 OM642 3.0-litre V6 turbodiesel engine, a high-grunt unit that brilliantly disguised its dieselness on the road. The output was 221hp but more importantly it dished up a bulbous 398lb ft from 1,600 to 2,400rpm. Pumping through the 7-speed 7G-TRONIC auto box, that was enough squirt to ease the 1,815kg CLS through the 0-60 in 6.8 seconds, loping on from there to 153mph. The official combined fuel consumption figure was 37.2mpg and the annual tax payable to His Maj’s Govt for the privilege of owning this 200g/km vehicle will be a not too outrageous £410.

The ad says that this car is a new arrival and that there’ll be more information added soon. Hopefully none of that will be bad. Last November’s MOT noted just one advisory for an interesting substance called corrision that had been found on both rear trailing arms. Other than that, the Sensotronic Braking Control system that was hailed for its newness in 2004 and then railed at for its unreliability shortly after was deleted sometime in 2006, so this car won’t have it. Nor, you would hope, will it have the equally untrustworthy Airmatic suspension, which was only available as an option on lower-spec models. Other than that, swirl flaps can stop swirling and turbo actuators can stop actuating, another way in which the CLS liked to sulk its way into limp mode. 

M-Bs of this age do have a reputation for electrical bother, which is probably why gen-one CLSs end up sliding into the sub-£2,000 swamp. Three years ago Shed said that investing some dosh into a Mercedes-dedicated MB STAR diagnostic tool had the potential to improve the ownership experience on almost any 21st-century Merc. A full-blown one would cost a fortune, but a limited C3 version at £500 or so would cover cars like this. 

Obviously £500 is still a lot, but the kit does include a laptop and all the cabling and if it plays a big role in keeping a car like this going then it might feel like money well spent – all the more so if you come over all entrepreneurial and set up a business telling other Benz owners what’s wrong with theirs. You might want to order up a tin hat to go with it though. Shed has a few lightly dented ones for sale.


See the original advert

Author
Discussion

el romeral

Original Poster:

2,107 posts

165 months

Yesterday (06:09)
quotequote all
These still look just as good today, as they did when new.

Willber

666 posts

197 months

Yesterday (06:19)
quotequote all
Decent car. Lots of niggly bits on the engine but nothing terminal or that expensive / complicated. An afternoon replacing all the turbo seals would be well spent and liven it up if not done already. The interiors are very good quality. I think they have aged pretty well.

yme402

649 posts

130 months

Yesterday (06:20)
quotequote all
A car for council estate thugs before they trade up to a series 1 Range Rover Sport.

Bear-n

1,948 posts

110 months

Yesterday (06:31)
quotequote all
Front is sat a tad low.

Bill

58,411 posts

283 months

Yesterday (06:59)
quotequote all
Bear-n said:
Front is sat a tad low.
Knackered air suspension???

"Buxom Motor Co’s Hansom Flatley Laundalette of 1908." made me chuckle. biggrin

wistec1

791 posts

69 months

Yesterday (07:08)
quotequote all
Fraught with danger and that low front suspension looks like the first offering in what could be a Pandoras box of problems. It passes the shed test.

FrankandLynn

89 posts

21 months

Yesterday (07:12)
quotequote all
I was never a fan of the styling of this motor and, to me, it still looks oddly proportioned with a sad face.

LightweightLouisDanvers

2,924 posts

71 months

Yesterday (07:30)
quotequote all
Not the best looking Mercedes ever but a lot of caf for £2k.
A private plate on that and it's looking very much like a more expensive car.
Im sure that would be nice to cruise about in.

mart4856

216 posts

52 months

Yesterday (07:31)
quotequote all
Always like the look of these and the design has aged pretty well. Right engine, reasonable VED, acceptable mileage and cheaper than a lease deposit. These old truck engines will easily do 300K miles if maintained, so this car should have plenty of life left. Stick a private plate on it and waft around it for at least a few more years.

cooperd5

147 posts

200 months

Yesterday (07:50)
quotequote all
FrankandLynn said:
I was never a fan of the styling of this motor and, to me, it still looks oddly proportioned with a sad face.
Same here, I've never liked the look but it looks a cut above a £2k car

J4CKO

46,744 posts

228 months

Yesterday (07:53)
quotequote all
yme402 said:
A car for council estate thugs before they trade up to a series 1 Range Rover Sport.
Someone always says this, every time there is an older luxury car as SOTW.

Yes, people with less money still have aspirations and appreciate a nice car on their limited budgets, no need to be so sniffy and judgmental. Any car takes on its surroundings, this Merc parked somewhere more salubrious without any dodgy modifications would still fit right in.

I used to have a similar looking V8 one, l really enjoyed it. This for a couple of grand will be a pleasant way to waft around, pity diesel is so expensive now.

People will pay daft money for older Mercs, have driven a few W124s and very good they were but would take this over one nowadays, some will say they dropped the quality but go and drive one of these, they feel very well made and they seem to have got the rust protection sorted again after the W210 era.

Edited by J4CKO on Friday 28th August 08:05

AC43

13,574 posts

236 months

Yesterday (08:16)
quotequote all
Nice shed. Although in real life I'd have the 500 or the 55. In fact, if there's one Merc I'd buy with the 55K, it's this one.


_Rodders_

3,539 posts

47 months

Yesterday (08:17)
quotequote all
One of those cars where I'm amazed how quickly they came and went. Particularly the first generation.

Maybe it's because they were distinctive that you notice but they were everywhere for a few years and now I can't remember the last time I saw one but it's definitely years.

username_checksout

516 posts

28 months

Yesterday (08:18)
quotequote all
The extruded-text number-plates would instantly make me wary of any car for sale.

Cryssys

909 posts

66 months

Yesterday (08:20)
quotequote all
One of the few recent sheds that is worthy of consideration. A decent car and almost sensible VED make it an attractive proposition.

Sold by lunchtime I reckon.



Edited by Cryssys on Friday 28th August 08:23

Escort3500

13,435 posts

173 months

Yesterday (08:24)
quotequote all
FrankandLynn said:
I was never a fan of the styling of this motor and, to me, it still looks oddly proportioned with a sad face.
yes

Ungainly and compromised design when first released, and hasn’t aged well.

Cryssys

909 posts

66 months

Yesterday (08:25)
quotequote all
yme402 said:
A car for council estate thugs before they trade up to a series 1 Range Rover Sport.
Yawn.

Just stick to the Express and Mail rather and stop boring us.

smilo996

3,784 posts

198 months

Yesterday (08:26)
quotequote all
criminally ugly outside in and that plastic wood 🧟‍♀️ but if reliable, I guess it is a Merc.

Sir Keith Stormer

853 posts

13 months

Yesterday (08:29)
quotequote all
I've owned a 2009 CLS 350 cdi grand edition for a few years now, I've had to do the oil cooler seals (they all do that Sir) but apart from servicing and lower arms it's been good as gold, an engine with genuine lunar mileage potential if serviced regularly, I do the oil every 5000 miles.

Kawasaki2000

222 posts

19 months

Yesterday (08:37)
quotequote all
I've read a few pieces by car designers recently and a common thread is they would rather design a car a few love even if many hate it. The accountants obviously feel differently. This sums up the CLS, its a car i always liked and I still like it today. Others will hate it, but when you do, be aware the guy wielding the pen knew you would.

As a shed? Reasonable VED and not bad punt for a few months if the suspension isnt boned.