LDL Colesterol 4.56, Statins or Lifestyle?
Discussion
My LDL is 4.56, target is 2.5.
Nurse said I can try lifestyle changes for 2 months and then start on statins if that doesn't work. (I've made some useful, sustainable, changes in reponse to the test, but I've been living like a monk since 2018 so there are limits to what I can do in terms of lifestyle. I'm active in general and run 5k a couple of times a week.)
Google says there is 0% chance of my getting down to 2.5 with lifestyle changes alone. 15% is the top end.
Given I'll be on statins anyway, should I call the doc and ask them to put me on statins now? Or wait the 2 months.
Any risks or downsides to statins?
(Yes, I've asked AI, but I suspect PH will know better.)
Nurse said I can try lifestyle changes for 2 months and then start on statins if that doesn't work. (I've made some useful, sustainable, changes in reponse to the test, but I've been living like a monk since 2018 so there are limits to what I can do in terms of lifestyle. I'm active in general and run 5k a couple of times a week.)
Google says there is 0% chance of my getting down to 2.5 with lifestyle changes alone. 15% is the top end.
Given I'll be on statins anyway, should I call the doc and ask them to put me on statins now? Or wait the 2 months.
Any risks or downsides to statins?
(Yes, I've asked AI, but I suspect PH will know better.)
I would certainly try the lifestyle changes first.
Statins have been among the most profitable drug classes in pharmaceutical history. Although generics now, lowering the guidelines and prescribing them to ever more people keeps profits high.
They can and do have nasty side effects. Those get minimized by the doctors and blamed on anything else. You will have to see for yourself.
There are specific benefitting groups, e.g. secondary prevention - men who have had a previous heart attack.
Outside those groups the absolute risk reduction is way less than you would guess. It is possible to have nasty side effects for years and live only a couple of days longer.
Number needed to treat / NNT is over 100. They are playing the odds by medicating everyone. That makes someone a lot of money, of course.
Go read more. And try lifestyle changes
Statins have been among the most profitable drug classes in pharmaceutical history. Although generics now, lowering the guidelines and prescribing them to ever more people keeps profits high.
They can and do have nasty side effects. Those get minimized by the doctors and blamed on anything else. You will have to see for yourself.
There are specific benefitting groups, e.g. secondary prevention - men who have had a previous heart attack.
Outside those groups the absolute risk reduction is way less than you would guess. It is possible to have nasty side effects for years and live only a couple of days longer.
Number needed to treat / NNT is over 100. They are playing the odds by medicating everyone. That makes someone a lot of money, of course.
Go read more. And try lifestyle changes
I would really take specific medical advice and whatever you do ignore anything written on here in terms of medical advice or other people's experience of using the drug .
It's a balance of all factors for you personally. This includes your own health and family history.
No-one writing on her knows your medical history nor has examined you and spoken to you in detail.
It's a balance of all factors for you personally. This includes your own health and family history.
No-one writing on her knows your medical history nor has examined you and spoken to you in detail.
grumbledoak said:
I would certainly try the lifestyle changes first.
Statins have been among the most profitable drug classes in pharmaceutical history. Although generics now, lowering the guidelines and prescribing them to ever more people keeps profits high.
They can and do have nasty side effects. Those get minimized by the doctors and blamed on anything else. You will have to see for yourself.
There are specific benefitting groups, e.g. secondary prevention - men who have had a previous heart attack.
Outside those groups the absolute risk reduction is way less than you would guess. It is possible to have nasty side effects for years and live only a couple of days longer.
Number needed to treat / NNT is over 100. They are playing the odds by medicating everyone. That makes someone a lot of money, of course.
Go read more. And try lifestyle changes
Great advice.Statins have been among the most profitable drug classes in pharmaceutical history. Although generics now, lowering the guidelines and prescribing them to ever more people keeps profits high.
They can and do have nasty side effects. Those get minimized by the doctors and blamed on anything else. You will have to see for yourself.
There are specific benefitting groups, e.g. secondary prevention - men who have had a previous heart attack.
Outside those groups the absolute risk reduction is way less than you would guess. It is possible to have nasty side effects for years and live only a couple of days longer.
Number needed to treat / NNT is over 100. They are playing the odds by medicating everyone. That makes someone a lot of money, of course.
Go read more. And try lifestyle changes
OP, you need to fully research statins and I just don't mean what the MSM peddle, try and dg a bit below the surface.
I am on medication for HBP, have borderline cholesterol issues and yet I wouldn't touch statins with a bargepole.
Good luck.
cliffords said:
I would really take specific medical advice and whatever you do ignore anything written on here in terms of medical advice or other people's experience of using the drug .
It's a balance of all factors for you personally. This includes your own health and family history.
No-one writing on her knows your medical history nor has examined you and spoken to you in detail.
I take your point but the nurse prescribing these things is putting near 0 thought into it. As all things health related in this country you really have to work this stuff out for yourself.It's a balance of all factors for you personally. This includes your own health and family history.
No-one writing on her knows your medical history nor has examined you and spoken to you in detail.
Another issue is WTF is medical advice? I can think of 5 medical issues I've had first hand involvement with where the doctor wouldn't give any advice. Ive pleaded with them to give me a clue what's best. I had (on the spot) to make a decision between options I had no knowledge of. - This latest encounter is a classic example. I had to choose on tbe spot between statins and lifestyle with no clue about the pros and cons. My bias is against meds so I chose lifestyle, then I came home to google and it turns out lifestyle is going to achieve nothing.
Anyway, thanks all. Sounds like waiting 2 months and seeing what giving up the last remaining of life's pleasures will achieve is the way ahead. Meanwhile I'll try to read up.
Medical advice is based on the guidelines and payments that GP practices are contracted to provide. Cholesterol control and statin prescribing is linked to patients with CHD, PAD, Stroke/TIA or CKD.
See page 14 onwards for the disease registers and requirements. Points equal prizes.
QOF
See page 14 onwards for the disease registers and requirements. Points equal prizes.
QOF
@BikeBikeBike......you are spot on the money bud, "medical advice" is a redundant term in he west now, it is basically the vested interest of Big Pharma masquerading as independent advice.
Modern medical interventions are driven by algorithms and so called pathways; you are 100% correct....you need to work it out for yourself.
Again, good luck.
Modern medical interventions are driven by algorithms and so called pathways; you are 100% correct....you need to work it out for yourself.
Again, good luck.
Gassing Station | Health Matters | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff