RE: Latest Dodge Charger is ready for Europe
RE: Latest Dodge Charger is ready for Europe
Thursday 17th September

Latest Dodge Charger is ready for Europe

'A muscle car designed for a new chapter' gets up to 550 petrol horsepower, Drift Mode, PowerShot and more... 


It would be fair to say that the launch of the electric Charger didn’t exactly go as Dodge planned - even with the perfect name for a battery-powered muscle car. Despite Dodge’s best efforts with the Fratzonic exhaust technology, a retro-inspired design and quarter-mile times (helped by 4WD) to make a Hellcat weep, the Daytona just didn’t chime with enthusiasts. Which the enthusiasts probably could have told Dodge from the outset. After all, the Charger EV was too heavy, too techy and too compromised to really appeal. 

For the latest generation Charger, Dodge has learnt from the error of its ways (somewhat). While a pair of Daytonas still exist - a 536hp R/T and 670hp Scat Pack - they’re being launched alongside the combustion-engined machines (all underpinned by the STLA Large platform) rather than ahead of them. And we’ll assume those are of more interest than those with a 100.5kWh battery pack and a front electric drive module that can be disconnected for efficiency. 

The Charger SIXPACK models (we’ll go with Sixpack from now on) are only as powerful as they were before, but a new turbo straight six without hybrid help feels notable in 2026. It offers up 420hp as a Charger R/T or 550hp as a Scat Pack, meaning 60mph in less than four seconds and a 12.2-second quarter mile.

All-wheel drive is retained, now with rear-drive selectable on the move (as seen in the recent Super Bee). And that’s just the start of the features, with PowerShot providing a 40hp, 10-second overboost, Launch Control, a Drag Mode and a ‘rear-biased propulsion configuration’ otherwise known as a Drift Mode. For those who don’t want to go full-bore two-wheel drive, it offers three different levels of traction control intervention. There’s also the equipment to show off the resulting japes to friends and family: get a Track Package on a Scat Pack (there are options aplenty, of course), and the Drive Experience Recorder by Cosworth is included, filming in 1080p. 

It isn’t just gimmicks, either: Dodge claims increased structural rigidity as well as ‘optimised’ weight distribution (though an exact figure isn’t quoted). Moreover, it references ‘a balance between capability, usability and performance precision.’ There are changes inside as well, with a 16-inch dash display, a dedicated drive-mode control and augmented head-up display. You don’t just get ambient lighting in a Dodge Charger, either - there’s 64-colour ‘Attitude Adjustment interior lighting’. Plus space for five and up to 1,064 litres of boot space. There’s the usual array of detections, recognitions and activations, too, but they’re probably as interesting as the electric car.

“For six decades, Charger has represented the very spirit of American muscle. Today, that spirit evolves for a new generation,” said Matt McAlear, Dodge CEO. “The next-generation Charger combines advanced engineering, innovative technologies and the freedom to choose how you experience performance. Whether electric or SIXPACK-powered, it delivers the same emotion, the same connection, and the same unmistakable Dodge attitude. This is a muscle car reimagined for the future, without ever losing its soul.”  For European cars, the message is still the same, with distribution via KW Automotive’s dealer network. We’re contacting a couple to see whether Europe includes the UK - let’s hope so. Or, if a four-wheel drive, straight six Dodge muscle car just doesn’t seem like cricket, the classifieds are always on hand


Author
Discussion

Cristio Nasser

Original Poster:

834 posts

22 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Meh

Clad-Hach

818 posts

17 months

Thursday
quotequote all
I don't like the front and lights.

gl20

1,199 posts

178 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Never thought I’d hear myself say this, but here’s a car that needs a BIGGER grille

Corkys

301 posts

230 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Looks totally wrong.

But I am happy they are still making these.

CLK-GTR

1,754 posts

274 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Its predecessor the Challenger looked brilliant, this just looks weird.

mjspencer348

301 posts

4 months

Thursday
quotequote all
gl20 said:
Never thought I d hear myself say this, but here s a car that needs a BIGGER grille
+1

Escort3500

13,465 posts

174 months

Thursday
quotequote all
CLK-GTR said:
Its predecessor the Challenger looked brilliant, this just looks weird.
My immediate thought too. This one’s a bit characterless.

Big_Steve

59 posts

79 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Love the design

spikyone

1,912 posts

129 months

Thursday
quotequote all
What a mess of a design. It's clearly huge, and as a result it looks horribly under-wheeled. The proportions are plain ugly and for a car with fairly simple lines, none of them work. There's not a single angle in those photos where it looks good.

LightweightLouisDanvers

2,945 posts

72 months

Thursday
quotequote all


I'll have a '69 please.

DodgyGeezer

48,986 posts

219 months

Thursday
quotequote all
it is a rather large (!!) car


rodericb

8,865 posts

155 months

Yesterday (00:21)
quotequote all
DodgyGeezer said:
it is a rather large (!!) car


Around the same length as an Audi A8 if I remember correctly. The picture above is illustrative of how large the car is: an adult driving it looks like a small child driving a BMW 4 series.

GTEYE

2,473 posts

239 months

Yesterday (06:11)
quotequote all
It needs more muscle. This render isn’t perfect but the arches and lights need to look a bit more like this:


Andy86GT

1,142 posts

94 months

Yesterday (07:10)
quotequote all

CH80

424 posts

26 months

Yesterday (07:12)
quotequote all
Good looking car. Needs a hemi.

Andy86GT

1,142 posts

94 months

Yesterday (07:15)
quotequote all
As others have said, the proportions look odd, much prefer the previous gen;

Uncle boshy

536 posts

98 months

Yesterday (07:19)
quotequote all
LightweightLouisDanvers said:


I'll have a '69 please.
I had the pleasure of driving one of these a couple of years ago. Whilst it bought back childhood memories, I’d say the roadhandling was not quite as good as my bed, hilarious, but one drive was enough

5lab

1,908 posts

225 months

Yesterday (07:22)
quotequote all
2.2 tonnes for the petrol version. Not really a sporting thing!

Uncle boshy

536 posts

98 months

Yesterday (07:38)
quotequote all
LightweightLouisDanvers said:


I'll have a '69 please.
I had the pleasure of driving one of these a couple of years ago. Whilst it bought back childhood memories, I’d say the roadhandling was not quite as good as my bed, hilarious, but one drive was enough

georgeyboy12345

4,605 posts

64 months

Yesterday (08:20)
quotequote all
This kind of car needs to be powered by a big V8