RE: 2026 Kia EV9 GT | UK Review
RE: 2026 Kia EV9 GT | UK Review
Yesterday

2026 Kia EV9 GT | UK Review

A silly SUV too far, or the best Kia GT yet?


This is PistonHeads - of course there was some reticence around the Kia EV9 GT. We declared the best automobile since 1998 to be the Lotus Elise, a car that in its original format weighed little more than a quarter of the EV9. A quarter! This is the largest, most expensive Kia ever offered to UK customers, twice that of the much-loved (and much-missed) Stinger GT from just a few years ago. Even those sold on the idea of an electric SUV might need some convincing of the 9: usually the best battery-powered buses are the laid-back ones (think Volvo), not the souped-up ones (think Audi). Plus the EV6 GT already exists in the Kia line-up, with more power for a lot less money and the same driver-focused tech. You might say that it looks smarter, too…  

So the flagship EV9 surely has a tough job on its hands convincing the detractors, not helped by being - and this is no exaggeration - one of the most irritating cars on sale. By default, it bongs when the speed limit changes, bongs as you move from Park to Drive, and bongs at the smallest speed transgression. As you attempt to disable some of that via many, many prods of the touchscreen, the attention assist is upset you aren’t looking ahead. The lane keep has all the subtlety of a ten-pin bowling barrier, so the XXL GT weaves down narrower roads like a torque-steering hot hatch. And the Virtual Gear Shift that is considered a selling point of the car only seems accessible from the screen which is a bit too far away. 

Bring all that together with a tough low-speed ride, sticky steering, and an interior that has as many smart and sporty touches as it does cheap and cheerful Kia ones, and the first impression is not good. Limited to just a quick test drive, it would prove maddening more than anything else. But it’s worth sticking with, honest. Having to disable the assists every single time the car is turned on is frustrating, though it’s advisable in a lot of new cars (just more time-consuming here). And once you’re not being driven to distraction, there’s the capacity to appreciate the car beneath the bongs, because it really is a decent one. Once above commuting speed, the ability of the suspension to marshal two and three-quarter tonnes of Kia is very impressive, maybe helped by the lighter wheels fitted as standard (it really is about more than just the green bits).

It’s complemented by steering that actually inspires confidence with its weight and response when going quicker - and while the EV9 is not a car that shrinks around you (what a feat that would be), neither is it one where the dimensions feel like an impediment to fun. Brake pedal feel is good, the regen smartly calibrated (and easily adjusted), the speed obviously considerable - without being the only point of interest. There’s just a little bit more about the everyday experience to elevate it above a regular EV9.

The bright yellow GT mode is hard to ignore for long, though, and is further proof that the 9 isn’t one to judge purely on appearances. (Bold may not necessarily always be beautiful, but it at least stands out.) Rather than turning the Kia into an unyielding, unpleasant mess, it usefully sharpens the driving experience without abandoning an easygoing nature. Steering, suspension and sound are all turned up a few notches, without being so overwrought (as often happens) that it can’t be driven more than a few miles. Heaven knows what it must look like from behind (or coming the other way), but there’s something approaching entertainment on offer, the EV9 being far keener to change direction and involve the driver than the dimensions would have you believe. The dash gets a funky new look, and an individual mode on the same button is handy (even if it does require more screen fiddling). 

What doesn’t require more fiddling, as it turns out, is the VGS, as it’s accessible via the star shortcut on the wheel. As Dobie mentioned from the international drive, it’s a nice feature to have even when going without the paddles, the rhythm of ratios changing (even artificial ones) a welcome accompaniment. It remains a convincing innovation, too, with gearshift jolts introduced where it’s appropriate and the build-up of performance through the ‘revs’ totally convincing. In fact, it’s a better installation than in the EV6, with eight gears instead of six aiding the sense of acceleration, a more inspiring sound, and faster shifts around the limiter. 

Indeed, there are a few scenarios where the 9 is actually preferable to the 6, which is surprising. Sometimes the other GT feels like it has a bit too much power for its own good; 150hp or so less makes the 9 feel more cohesive and less chaotic, its eLSD doing as desired rather than feeling overworked. Obvious though it will sound, too, this thing is ginormous: there can’t be much else that can carry so much as well as keep the driver moderately engaged. It’s subdued at a cruise, the seats are excellent, storage and charging solutions plentiful, and so on. Maybe the niche of people to which the big Kia’s strengths will appeal is small, though they’ll likely be impressed. Especially when they become rather less than £80k, too.  

Put most simply, the GT is a likeable car to drive in a host of circumstances. Sure, it is big and heavy, though it’s hardly the only such car to be larger than ideal; battery power may not appeal to all, though the EV9 wouldn’t drive as nicely with a combustion engine lumped out front. And which one would Kia use? Something less weighty and more efficient would be great, of course - you’ll do well to get 3mi/kWh - though again that’s true for a lot of EVs. At least you won’t forget driving one in a hurry. 

Moreover, lest we do forget, this isn’t meant to be the core Kia GT product. It's meant to be a bit of fun at the top of the range, the silly SUV that sells in small numbers to the very committed. And the lineup is definitely more interesting for having this around. Of more relevance will be those Kia EVs coming soon that cost half as much and weigh hundreds of kilos less; if the leviathan EV9 GT can be as enjoyable as this post-bong phase, hopes certainly deserve to be high for models like the upcoming EV4.


SPECIFICATION | 2026 KIA EV9 GT

Engine: Twin permanent magnet synchronous electric motors
Transmission: Single-speed, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 508
Torque (lb ft): 546
0-62mph: 4.6sec
Top speed: 136mph
Weight: 2,718kg
Battery: 800V lithium-ion, 99.8kWh capacity
Efficiency/range: 2.8mi/kWh, 316 miles
Max DC charging: 350kW; 10-80% charge in 24mins
Price: £82,235

Author
Discussion

mjspencer348

Original Poster:

326 posts

4 months

Yesterday (06:20)
quotequote all
I'd have one of these over an Audi Q9, but that's probably damning with faint praise.

Dog Star

17,584 posts

197 months

Yesterday (06:36)
quotequote all
That does look pretty cool especially from that front quarter view.

As to the weight - everyone bleats about EVs being monstrously heavy, but how does it compare to the previous posters Q9 example? Let’s not forget the fact that it’s going to be a lot cheaper to run in every way too.

Q9 2605kg for the range topper. So this weighs in at a fat bloke more - hardly a huge difference.


GTEYE

2,476 posts

239 months

Yesterday (06:51)
quotequote all
For a nearly 3 tonne bus, I do wonder if the GT designation is really appropriate?

Bengaside

17 posts

58 months

Yesterday (07:18)
quotequote all
I struggle to see the appeal of such large SUVs. To my mind, it would be like driving a Transit van everywhere, albeit a well appointed one. Sure, they do look fantastic and will out drag most cars off the line. But, as soon as the roads narrow or get a little twisty - which living in the Cotswolds is pretty much all of the roads - and the drivers of large SUVs end up going significantly below the speed limit. I assume either owing to the high centre of gravity eroding their confidence, or the sheer size of the car making it difficult to place on the road. In places like Dubai or parts of the US these must be brilliant to own and use daily, but for the UK? I'm not convinced.

cerb4.5lee

44,555 posts

209 months

Yesterday (07:20)
quotequote all
So much to love here...where do I sign? hehe

RedWhiteMonkey

9,108 posts

211 months

Yesterday (07:27)
quotequote all
GTEYE said:
For a nearly 3 tonne bus, I do wonder if the GT designation is really appropriate?
GT cars generally aren't lightweight, rather they are generally luxury vehicles designed for comfortable, high-speed, long-distance driving.

This thing is a couple of hundred kilos heavier than a fully optioned Bentley Continental GT, but it is bigger and offers more space. It has all the toys you could want so I would say it is pretty luxurious, yes it isn't a Bentley but it is around a third of the price of one. 0-62mph in 4.6 seconds means it certainly isn't slow and 136mph is plenty fast enough.

Perhaps the range isn't GT, a plug in hybrid Continental GT will do around 500 miles, but stopping every 300 or so miles for a half hour break whilst storming against the Continent is probably a good idea anyway.

Dog Star

17,584 posts

197 months

Yesterday (07:33)
quotequote all
Bengaside said:
I struggle to see the appeal of such large SUVs. To my mind, it would be like driving a Transit van everywhere, albeit a well appointed one. Sure, they do look fantastic and will out drag most cars off the line. But, as soon as the roads narrow or get a little twisty - which living in the Cotswolds is pretty much all of the roads - and the drivers of large SUVs end up going significantly below the speed limit. I assume either owing to the high centre of gravity eroding their confidence, or the sheer size of the car making it difficult to place on the road. In places like Dubai or parts of the US these must be brilliant to own and use daily, but for the UK? I'm not convinced.
Do you have the same view of people driving Range Rovers, BMW X5s and big Merc SUVs around the Cotswolds? Similar size and weight. Or is this just because it’s an EV? Or a Kia?

cerb4.5lee

44,555 posts

209 months

Yesterday (07:40)
quotequote all
RedWhiteMonkey said:
Perhaps the range isn't GT...
No perhaps for me, this takes the piss literally in every direction for sure. It looks cheap, but it's expensive, and the range is diabolical. You'd need your head testing to rent/loan this in my view.

Starburster

13 posts

Yesterday (07:42)
quotequote all
80 grand for a feckin’ Kia? You’d have to be insane.

_Rodders_

4,234 posts

48 months

Yesterday (07:45)
quotequote all
Why does it have to convince any detractors? I see this written a lot.

It doesn't make any sense. You're not going to go from a detractor to buying one.

They need to convince those that are curious and capable of buying one.

Stick that power train in the PV7, it would be hilarious.

GianiCakes

681 posts

102 months

Yesterday (07:55)
quotequote all
I think these look cool and would make a great family bus. Don’t know about the price but I’m sure there are better ways to finance one. My daughter has the Sportage and it’s a very well made and efficient way to transport 2 young children to their various activities, the modern Golf in many ways.

RedWhiteMonkey

9,108 posts

211 months

Yesterday (07:55)
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
and the range is diabolical.
Diabolical seems a tad of extreme to me, what would be a good range for a car? This thing will easily drive from London to Newcastle on a charge, stick it on a decent charger when you get there and it'll be fully charged within an hour.

The average car journey distance in the UK is less than 7 miles per trip. Around half of all drivers average less than 20 miles a day. What percentage of people actually needs a car that can do 500+ miles in one go?

RedWhiteMonkey

9,108 posts

211 months

Yesterday (07:58)
quotequote all
Starburster said:
80 grand for a feckin Kia? You d have to be insane.
Welcome to 2026, Kia build quality is top notch now. Similar sized cars (VW Touareg, etc.) at the same sort of spec level will cost you more than 80k new.

scenario8

7,943 posts

208 months

Yesterday (08:01)
quotequote all
It’s such a pity the combined efforts of legislators and manufacturers mean we have to endure “good” cars being simultaneously so annoying.

Blib

48,072 posts

226 months

Yesterday (08:02)
quotequote all
Starburster said:
80 grand for a feckin Kia? You d have to be insane.
William Paley said:
There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance—that principle is contempt prior to investigation.
thumbup

_Rodders_

4,234 posts

48 months

Yesterday (08:03)
quotequote all
RedWhiteMonkey said:
Starburster said:
80 grand for a feckin Kia? You d have to be insane.
Welcome to 2026, Kia build quality is top notch now. Similar sized cars (VW Touareg, etc.) at the same sort of spec level will cost you more than 80k new.
It's not actually as bad as I was expecting.

I thought the standard top trim EV9 was about that price.

drgoatboy

2,028 posts

236 months

Yesterday (08:07)
quotequote all
Definitely a fan of the ev9, this gt version only adds to that's, but the sheer size of the thing puts me off getting one.

My enyaq is a bit of a squeeze in most car parks and this is considerably bigger.
Not so handy for dropping the kids off if you can't actually park it anywhere....

S600BSB

8,354 posts

135 months

Yesterday (08:11)
quotequote all
Hideous looking thing.

Kawasicki

14,365 posts

264 months

Yesterday (08:21)
quotequote all
scenario8 said:
It s such a pity the combined efforts of legislators and manufacturers mean we have to endure good cars being simultaneously so annoying.
I was at chassis engineering conference recently and one of the major topics was the widespread customer dissatisfaction with advanced driver assistance systems. There was much consternation and discussion about why this is the case. I put my hand up and offered the radical suggestion that maybe it was a mistake to offer plainly crap technology to customers before it was ready. Silence.

cerb4.5lee

44,555 posts

209 months

Yesterday (08:23)
quotequote all
RedWhiteMonkey said:
cerb4.5lee said:
and the range is diabolical.
Diabolical seems a tad of extreme to me, what would be a good range for a car? This thing will easily drive from London to Newcastle on a charge, stick it on a decent charger when you get there and it'll be fully charged within an hour.

The average car journey distance in the UK is less than 7 miles per trip. Around half of all drivers average less than 20 miles a day. What percentage of people actually needs a car that can do 500+ miles in one go?
It's still diabolical for the money in my view though. Not to mention the fact that we've done 30k miles a year in our long distance car for 20 years now as well. I appreciate that almost everyone just pops around the corner to the shop for example though(so an electric car is ideal for that for definite), but some of us do actually use our cars though to be fair.

Plus I've also got my Caterham for my 7 mile trip to be fair as well(or under 20 miles anyway), so I totally get it don't get me wrong. That's only done just over 5k miles now and it's 24 years old for example, so I can put my feet in the shoes of the majority of folk that don't drive many miles at least as well. However I still wouldn't borrow this for over £80k though either way to be honest.