The law? Section 59
Discussion
This is now a big concern and feel this government are making a complete arse of our country, it seems if you overtook 2 cars that were driving along at slow speeds and you went past they both contacted the local police the police are now able to seize your car just because you had looked to the other drivers to be dangerous. 🤔🤔 I what's happening is just wrong.
• Removal of the Warning System: Previously under Section 59 of the Police Reform Act 2002, officers had to issue a formal warning first and wait for a repeat offense within 12 months before they could confiscate a vehicle. That requirement is now completely removed.
• Immediate Seizure: Police can impound a vehicle on the spot if it is driven carelessly, inconsiderately, at excessive speeds, or in a manner that causes alarm, distress, or annoyance to the public.
• Targeted Behaviors: The strengthened powers aim to crack down on street racing, unauthorized car meets, dangerous oversteering ("donuts"), nuisance off-road biking, and excessive speeding in local communities.
• Reclaiming the Vehicle: Owners receive a seizure notice explaining how to pick up their impounded car. To get it back, you must prove legal ownership, show a valid driving license, and provide proof of proper insurance, alongside paying statutory recovery and storage fees. Most users on Reddit agree that vehicles are held in this manner rather than being immediately crushed or permanently destroyed.
Would you like to know more about how to appeal a vehicle seizure or the exact fees and documents required to recover a car from the police pound?
ks - the stupid US spelling gives it away!Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff