RE: Rover SD1 | Spotted
RE: Rover SD1 | Spotted
Today

Rover SD1 | Spotted

Cheap and cool classics are something of a rare breed nowadays - but they aren't extinct


You wouldn’t be alone in finding old cars more appealing than ever right now. As new cars become more expensive, more ugly and more annoying, so a time of greater freedom becomes ever more attractive. Undoubtedly some very worthwhile improvements have been made when it comes to safety and emissions, albeit with plenty of desirability sacrificed in the process. 

This has made old cars expensive. Even more expensive than they were, because it seems that more people are now clamouring for the limited stock, to remember when motoring meant freedom and not death by a thousand bongs. Whether sports car, hot hatch or supercar, it feels like values are stronger than ever. Or asking prices are, at least.

But it is possible to spend relatively little and buy a cool old car - buying British is the answer. A decent MG B can still be bought for £6k, £15k TVR Chimaeras exist, and there are four Westfields on PH at less than £11,000. In some instances, the brand cachet might not be there; the experience most certainly will be.

And for those who want the space, there’s the Rover SD1. Arguably no one model has represented the best and worst of British car-making quite so well. The Rover looked daring and stylish inside and out, drove with real polish - yet was so poorly assembled during a period of industrial angst that its reputation was permanently tarnished. Never mind the European Car of the Year award and touring car successes; too many broke or crumbled, which somewhat sealed the Rover’s fate. 

However, 40 years on from the end of production (and almost 50 since the ECOTY honour), the SD1 is now looked on rather more favourably. The survivors, at least. Because the design is still spectacular, the venerable V8 is in plenty, and a funky spec - as was the fashion at the time - seems almost guaranteed. While still not commanding megabucks. 

This one began life as a 3500SE in Oporto Red with a beige cloth interior, but at some point in its life has been upgraded to a 4.6-litre V8. Even with modest power from the factory, a swept capacity increase of almost a litre is surely going to make for quite the performance uplift. This SD1 has also been treated to some Vitesse exterior parts, so it both looks and sounds the part. Indeed for a car that’s now 44 years old (and 44 years before this was 1938), without the best reputation for quality, it looks very tidy indeed. 

A low mileage of little more than 80k will help; one of the previous owners kept the Rover for more than 30 years, too, and you aren’t likely to do that without somewhere nice to keep the car. It’ll surely benefit from a bit of TLC (because everything that’s 44, whether on four wheels or two legs, would do), but what a cool car to lavish some effort on. 

Plus it's only £12k. No doubt there was a time that SD1s were being traded for a week’s wages, but that’s a long time in the past now. In 2026 it doesn’t look like very much money for such a handsome hunk of V8 fastback. Not when so much else from the 20th century costs as much as it does.


See the original advert 

Author
Discussion

Lotusgone

Original Poster:

1,657 posts

157 months

"Yes, that looks really good"

"Hang on, where are we going to put the exhaust?"

"Dammit..."


LightweightLouisDanvers

2,961 posts

73 months

Love it.
An all time favourite.

sideways man

1,671 posts

167 months

Looks a good example and a reasonable price. I’d have this no problem.
My mate’s dad had one of the first V8’s in South Wales, remember them being Huge back in the day….

V12GT

666 posts

120 months

These were everywhere for a very short time when I was growing up, then they all disappeared almost overnight when the Sierra came out.

Good to see one, but not for me, even with the same V8 as I had in my TVR.

AndyCaerdydd

10 posts

104 months

Does anyone actually think a car like this is ‘cool’? A 44 year old Rover?

Triumph Man

9,608 posts

198 months

AndyCaerdydd said:
Does anyone actually think a car like this is cool ? A 44 year old Rover?
Yes lots of people.

I really wish I'd bought one when they were still stupid cheap. There's one that lives near me somewhere - I heard it pull out of my local petrol station on full chat and it sounded amazing.

samoht

7,250 posts

176 months


Love it, looks fab and the engine upgrade sounds interesting.

If it's in as good bodily and structural condition as it looks, seems worth the money.

mjspencer348

373 posts

5 months

Only British Leyland/Austin Rover would think it was fine to fit the column stalks from their cheapest car in their flagship model. Aside from the V8 engine, I never got the appeal of these and yes, I've been in a few when they were new.

AndyCaerdydd

10 posts

104 months

Triumph Man said:
AndyCaerdydd said:
Does anyone actually think a car like this is cool ? A 44 year old Rover?
Yes lots of people.

I really wish I'd bought one when they were still stupid cheap. There's one that lives near me somewhere - I heard it pull out of my local petrol station on full chat and it sounded amazing.
I get the nostalgia thing about cars of this era. I love looking at pics from the mid 80s when I was a teenager, and from years before that. These cars are great to look at when you’re wandering around a car show on an airfield in Oxfordshire or somewhere, but they are definitely not ‘cool’. There’s no real definition of the word but it’s not this. If you’re likely to be spending your Sunday mornings under it, hammering at the engine while you’re in your overalls covered in oil, which you were likely to do when these were new, that’s not cool in anyone’s book

edoverheels

612 posts

135 months

Lotusgone said:
"Yes, that looks really good"

"Hang on, where are we going to put the exhaust?"

"Dammit..."
It does look comic now you have pointed it out.

Orangutangerine

846 posts

210 months

Stunning car and one of the coolest things you can buy. Definitely not what I'd call a "cheap" classic though. Over £5k does not qualify as "cheap", even these days.

carinaman

25,206 posts

202 months

I don't knew if that blue one is still available or how much the vendor wants it:

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...

WPA

14,696 posts

144 months

AndyCaerdydd said:
Does anyone actually think a car like this is cool ? A 44 year old Rover?
Yes, always had a soft spot for the SD1 but would prefer a Vitesse however the 4.6 in this sounds interesting

Quhet

2,937 posts

176 months

This just looks like it'll stink of petrol for some reason, very cool though laugh

skylarking808

1,225 posts

116 months

This just makes me think of traffic police in their "jam sandwich" Rovers, as that is how most SD1's were seen in period.

Watcher of the skies

1,321 posts

67 months

AndyCaerdydd said:
Does anyone actually think a car like this is cool ? A 44 year old Rover?
Yes. It's certainly cooler than being a customer relationship advisor.

LRDefender

803 posts

38 months

I've always liked these, especially as a wee nipper as they just seemed so big & cool. Love it.

J4CKO

46,843 posts

230 months

AndyCaerdydd said:
Triumph Man said:
AndyCaerdydd said:
Does anyone actually think a car like this is cool ? A 44 year old Rover?
Yes lots of people.

I really wish I'd bought one when they were still stupid cheap. There's one that lives near me somewhere - I heard it pull out of my local petrol station on full chat and it sounded amazing.
I get the nostalgia thing about cars of this era. I love looking at pics from the mid 80s when I was a teenager, and from years before that. These cars are great to look at when you re wandering around a car show on an airfield in Oxfordshire or somewhere, but they are definitely not cool . There s no real definition of the word but it s not this. If you re likely to be spending your Sunday mornings under it, hammering at the engine while you re in your overalls covered in oil, which you were likely to do when these were new, that s not cool in anyone s book
Who made you arbiter of what is cool, or not ? Some people think PT Cruisers are dead cool, they arent wrong, I just dont think they are.

Who hammers at engines ? Am guessing you arent a hands on mechanic, would be more keeping on top of rust with cars of this era.

When new it was a fairly upmarket cars, the first owners would be the previous generation or two whose equivalents now would have say a 5 series or similar, it was quite a posh car when new, well out of the reach of most working people. It was for managers and higher ups along with Granadas, Carltons and the like, those folk very much did not tinker wearing overalls, it would have been sent in to Henlys, Lookers or similar for servicing or warranty work.

Go and watch a few videos of these in touring, and even rally car guises, they were pretty cool, the Vitesse was a properly desirable car back then, best part of 50 years ago, when most had a Hillman Imp, Vauxhall Viva, Hillman Hunter or Ford Cortina.

Most were 2 litres, 2.3, 2.6 and even a very rare diesel, but a V8 had serious kudos, with about what 140 bhp (for the normal V8, 190 for the Vitesse) and some torque when most cars had under half that and very little torque.

This one needs a little height out of the suspension, I am not one for over lowering cars but not one for massive arch gaps, some SD1s were worse than this even but a couple of inches out of it would help massively. They were always a good looking thing to my eye.





AndyCaerdydd

10 posts

104 months

Watcher of the skies said:
AndyCaerdydd said:
Does anyone actually think a car like this is cool ? A 44 year old Rover?
Yes. It's certainly cooler than being a customer relationship advisor.
Well done. Love to know what you do for a living. But don’t worry, I’m above being personal about what you do

AndyCaerdydd

10 posts

104 months

J4CKO said:
AndyCaerdydd said:
Triumph Man said:
AndyCaerdydd said:
Does anyone actually think a car like this is cool ? A 44 year old Rover?
Yes lots of people.

I really wish I'd bought one when they were still stupid cheap. There's one that lives near me somewhere - I heard it pull out of my local petrol station on full chat and it sounded amazing.
I get the nostalgia thing about cars of this era. I love looking at pics from the mid 80s when I was a teenager, and from years before that. These cars are great to look at when you re wandering around a car show on an airfield in Oxfordshire or somewhere, but they are definitely not cool . There s no real definition of the word but it s not this. If you re likely to be spending your Sunday mornings under it, hammering at the engine while you re in your overalls covered in oil, which you were likely to do when these were new, that s not cool in anyone s book
Who made you arbiter of what is cool, or not ? Some people think PT Cruisers are dead cool, they arent wrong, I just dont think they are.

Who hammers at engines ? Am guessing you arent a hands on mechanic, would be more keeping on top of rust with cars of this era.

When new it was a fairly upmarket cars, the first owners would be the previous generation or two whose equivalents now would have say a 5 series or similar, it was quite a posh car when new, well out of the reach of most working people. It was for managers and higher ups along with Granadas, Carltons and the like, those folk very much did not tinker wearing overalls, it would have been sent in to Henlys, Lookers or similar for servicing or warranty work.

Go and watch a few videos of these in touring, and even rally car guises, they were pretty cool, the Vitesse was a properly desirable car back then, best part of 50 years ago, when most had a Hillman Imp, Vauxhall Viva, Hillman Hunter or Ford Cortina.

Most were 2 litres, 2.3, 2.6 and even a very rare diesel, but a V8 had serious kudos, with about what 140 bhp (for the normal V8, 190 for the Vitesse) and some torque when most cars had under half that and very little torque.

This one needs a little height out of the suspension, I am not one for over lowering cars but not one for massive arch gaps, some SD1s were worse than this even but a couple of inches out of it would help massively. They were always a good looking thing to my eye.
Never said I was an ‘arbiter’ of what’s cool. Just an opinion. We are allowed them, aren’t we?