RE: No messin': follow-up iCaur V25 already unveiled
RE: No messin': follow-up iCaur V25 already unveiled
Yesterday

No messin': follow-up iCaur V25 already unveiled

Last week might have been the first time you'd heard of iCaur - it won't be the last


Say what you will of the Chinese car makers, they don’t hang around. Chery offshoot, iCaur, only confirmed last week that it will launch in the UK with the upmarket(ish) V27. Now it is touting the global reveal of the next rung down, the V25. As might be expected, a lot of the ‘25 is familiar from the ‘27. Here’s another large, electrified five-seat SUV, typically more rugged than what we’re used to seeing and with a design - how best to put it - inspired by some very recognisable 4x4 icons. For the latest iCaur V, there are strong 40-series Land Cruiser nods at the front, and maybe a bit of G-Class to the rear. With chunky tyres, prominent arch extensions, a squared-off silhouette and a spare wheel on the rear door, it’s ticking all the required boxes to be considered a proper off-roader. The covered rear window on this V25 suggests maybe a commercial or lifestyle element, a bit like a Defender Hardtop. To think we’d made it this far without mentioning the Land Rover. 

iCaur suggests that the V25 ‘follows the brand’s architectural design DNA through a blend of strong proportions and clean lines’. The old school look is very deliberate, too, part of the brand’s Future-Classic design philosophy. The aim is to keep ‘the enduring appeal of classic design while responding to the tastes and lifestyles of a new generation.’ Look how successful, say, the Jimny was when it adopted a retro look - Suzuki couldn’t get enough of them. People like it, so rather than trying to convince them that they ought to be driving something they instinctively don't like, iCaur appears ready to stick with the same design language. Mental, right? 

As for what else to expect from the V25 technically, there isn’t much to know for the moment. The inside is similar to the outside, which is to say recognisable to the V27 but a little more utilitarian. The layout beneath the central screen is a little more basic, for example, and where the V27 is being shown off with bright metals and tan leather, black is the order of the day here. iCaur says the new car is designed ‘for those who want to live life on their own terms… to move seamlessly between urban commutes and outdoor adventures.’ It’s a four-wheeled fleece - and the V27 is a slightly fancier one, it seems. 

The V25 has been revealed at the iCaur International User Summit in Wuhu, China. While nothing has been confirmed yet about whether this will make it to the UK just yet, you'd imagine Chery has every intention of following up its debut model as soon as possible. Assuming the UK government doesn't change its attitude to Chinese car tariffs in the meantime. Or the V27 fails to land with British SUV buyers next year. But frankly, at time of writing, that would be a surprise...


Author
Discussion

pb8g09

Original Poster:

3,252 posts

99 months

Yesterday (14:25)
quotequote all
Knocked it out of the park. Nice low price and strong performance and I’ll have one please, on lease. Hope that froths a few of the curtain twitchers from the last thread on these… snigger.

malaccamax

1,666 posts

261 months

Yesterday (14:28)
quotequote all
This is quite appealing. Wasn't there a story about Ineos looking to source either this or the bigger V27 to turn it into their cheaper model under the Grenadier? Missed a trick if so!

RandomCarChat

1,267 posts

77 months

Yesterday (14:31)
quotequote all
Should I be worried that I quite like that? getmecoat

Ben Lowden

7,362 posts

207 months

PH Marketing Bloke

Yesterday (14:38)
quotequote all
Really like the look of this, bravo! Look forward to finding out more details in due course.

Ray_Aber

951 posts

306 months

Yesterday (14:48)
quotequote all
Not my thing at all, but for what it is, it's done well.

However, if it's heavy, then please tax it accordingly, dear Chancellor. Just like HGVs, who damage the road a lot, and pay proportionately for it.

JerryF

333 posts

204 months

Yesterday (15:04)
quotequote all
100% import duty on the Chinese Communist Clone Cars - Mr Chancellor!

Watcher of the skies

1,352 posts

67 months

Yesterday (15:08)
quotequote all
Pathetic.
Are they incapable of original thought?

mjspencer348

469 posts

5 months

Yesterday (15:09)
quotequote all
382mm shorter than a Defender 110, which seems a good size for UK use. Looks smart in that colour, nice.

Oily76

258 posts

141 months

Yesterday (15:16)
quotequote all
This will do very well, I'm sure. Unnecessarily massive apocalypse ready cars seem to be all the rage right now. Our small town is full of the fkers.

PCaluta

58 posts

1 month

Yesterday (15:24)
quotequote all
RandomCarChat said:
Should I be worried that I quite like that? getmecoat
Not at all - be proud of your taste and don't second guess yourself!

I think it looks good too and I'm not even massively into 4x4s... smile

Twoshoe

1,005 posts

214 months

Yesterday (15:34)
quotequote all
I'd love to live in a place called Wuhu

The Driving God

137 posts

65 months

Yesterday (15:35)
quotequote all
Ray_Aber said:
Not my thing at all, but for what it is, it's done well. However, if it's heavy, then please tax it accordingly, dear Chancellor. Just like HGVs, who damage the road a lot, and pay proportionately for it.
That’s a great point, especially since a standard HGV (class 1) only pays £1 a year, not a typo, just a single pound and only £161 for those up to 31 tonnes.Right now, EVs registered after 31/3/2017 pay £200 a year. If the Chancellor actually listened to you, EV drivers would be paying less than 10p a year in tax.

Phateuk

1,011 posts

167 months

Yesterday (15:54)
quotequote all
Twoshoe said:
I'd love to live in a place called Wuhu
Sounds fun doesn't it hehe

je777

1,193 posts

134 months

Yesterday (16:01)
quotequote all
To those who complain about Chinese vehicles:

Are you or are you not in favour of free-market capitalism?

Shouldn't the market take care of everything?

Doesn't competition breed excellence?

As we're always told, capitalism is the only system that works.


Ray_Aber

951 posts

306 months

Yesterday (16:19)
quotequote all
The Driving God said:
Ray_Aber said:
Not my thing at all, but for what it is, it's done well.

However, if it's heavy, then please tax it accordingly, dear Chancellor. Just like HGVs, who damage the road a lot, and pay proportionately for it.
That s a great point, especially since a standard HGV (class 1) only pays £1 a year, not a typo, just a single pound and only £161 for those up to 31 tonnes.
Right now, EVs registered after 31/3/2017 pay £200 a year.

If the Chancellor actually listened to you, EV drivers would be paying less than 10p a year in tax.
Well, if you are right, then I stand corrected. However, I understood that HGVs - as a group of vehicles - also pay an additional HGV road user levy on top of the standard HGV charges which you have not factored in. According to the Freight Transport Association, HGVs pay £4.4bn in tax annually, with the annual road maintenance bill being £4.7bn.

Now I'm sure that the FTA are being selective with their numbers (they include fuel duty for example), but my point stands. Heavy vehicles should pay additional taxes for the additional road damage they cause, not to mention the environmental cost of construction (additional materials). That's only fair, and would incentivise manufacturers to build lighter vehicles, and disincentivise individuals from buying overweight vehicles whose impact on the environment is disproportionately destructive. France does this with its Malus tax, which hammers heavy vehicles, although unfortunately this does not currently apply to EVs (whose heavier weight should be allowed for, but only in part - say, 350kg - 400kg).

Of course, we'll never see that take place as it would destroy JLR and many of the c.35,000 jobs that rely on their success.

If the Chancellor listened to me, EVs would be paying rather more than 10p a year in tax, especially heavy ones, but you knew that, didn't you?

I don't like overweight cars. Your view may differ.

nismo48

7,142 posts

237 months

Yesterday (17:19)
quotequote all
RandomCarChat said:
Should I be worried that I quite like that? getmecoat
Not at all, I think that its ok too

JoshSm

5,239 posts

67 months

Yesterday (18:07)
quotequote all
Well it looks the part, but there's a bit more involved than just that, even if it is relatively cheap.

Wonder what the driving and ownership experience will be like?

CountyLines

6,163 posts

33 months

Yesterday (18:18)
quotequote all
pb8g09 said:
Knocked it out of the park. Nice low price and strong performance and I ll have one please, on lease. Hope that froths a few of the curtain twitchers from the last thread on these snigger.
Ditto. I'd lease one.

Nobody13

813 posts

232 months

Yesterday (18:23)
quotequote all
Watcher of the skies said:
Pathetic.
Are they incapable of original thought?
Agreed, Chinese companies need to be taken to task over intellectual property rights.

pb8g09

Original Poster:

3,252 posts

99 months

Yesterday (18:29)
quotequote all
Nobody13 said:
Agreed, Chinese companies need to be taken to task over intellectual property rights.
Why do you care? Just don’t buy it.