RE: 2026 Mercedes S580e L | UK Review
RE: 2026 Mercedes S580e L | UK Review
Today

2026 Mercedes S580e L | UK Review

The most comprehensively improved S-Class ever makes it to the UK - we try the 585hp flagship


Imagine a present where the Mercedes EQS was a roaring success. Hard to do, right? But in that reality, one far removed from our own, a properly lauded all-electric luxury saloon might have dissuaded Mercedes from bothering with such a far-reaching S-Class facelift, one touted to deliver 2,700 alterations. Instead, the EQS descended like a lead balloon through the glass floor, its tiny audience presumably defeating even Mercedes most pessimistic projections; so much so that, for a time, the firm stopped building them altogether. After four years on sale, just 26 are available in the classifieds, which anecdotally suggests they are as numerous on UK roads as Corvettes. 

For those of us inclined to think most EVs an imperfect and untimely solution to a politically motivated issue, the EQS was perfect evidence of early OEM adopter folly: Mercedes already built arguably the best luxury saloon, it needed to be electrified in 2021 like a dog needs a cappuccino maker. The market’s reluctance to embrace the model is presumably one of the factors that ordained not just the most comprehensive update of the S-Class ever attempted, but also the introduction of a new flat plane crank V8 engine to power it. 

Naturally, UK customers haven’t been allowed to sample the pleasure of eight cylinders in Mercedes’ flagship for yonks - and that’s likely because the S-Class appeals less to big spending car enthusiasts in this country (who, after all, have Bentley and Rolls-Royce right on the doorstep), and more to powerfully built company directors who like to be chauffeured about the place in something less ostentatious and nakedly expensive to refuel. First-hand experience of the previous V8-powered model has suggested they are missing out, but for now the plug-in hybrid S580e occupies the top rung of the powertrain ladder. 

This combines Mercedes’ turbocharged 3.0-litre straight-six (outputting the same 449hp it does in numerous AMG models) with a 163hp electric motor housed in the nine-speed transmission for 585hp overall. You can have the same engine unaided by battery power in the S500, which trades chunkier straight-line performance for lower weight - though obviously you don’t get 60-odd miles of EV range. Assuming you (or more likely, a staff member) has remembered to plug it in, that is. Inevitably, the hybrid enjoys a preferential tax bracket; inevitably, its claimed lower running costs are thwarted if you don’t keep the battery topped up.

As is often the case with hybrids, the real-world experience is a mixed bag. Despite the failure of the EQS to float people’s boat, electric motors are hardly misaligned with a silent, swanky driving experience - meaning you’re unlikely to complain about the way the S580e ghosts away from a standing start, nor how it glides conveniently to A-road speeds. How could you when there’s a water-cooled supercomputer (not really, but let’s humour Mercedes here), absorbing the input of so many cameras, radar sensors and ultrasonic measurers to help smooth out the road ahead? Sure, not all of them are dedicated to improving the ride quality - most cater for Level 4 autonomous driving - but rarely does a chassis convince you so completely that your journey is being systematically reduced to a GPS-informed algorithm. 

As you might expect, there is an unreal quality to the way the Airmatic suspension deftly counters the jigsaw puzzle that is every knobbly B road, so plainly is its vertical stiffness being modulated for the prevailing conditions - but you tend to forgive its disinterest in realism or driver engagement; the S-Class would much rather be the twenty featherbeds between you and the proverbial pea. Thus it makes sense that the control surfaces are glassy and the silence deafening, too: the S580e’s default mode is a millpond-style serenity. It’s like driving a pair of moccasins. 

Which is great for as long as you’re content to let battery power carry the load. But only a saint would potter for so long in a car that claims to output nearly 600hp; before long you’ll find yourself prodding for the place in the throttle map where the engine comes alive. The transition is achieved smoothly enough - though not without the S580e clinging onto silent running for a beat too long - and, to listen to, the straight-six (a vocal presence in other applications), is as distant as a colonial cousin. At no point does the flagship feel stupendously quick, though perhaps you wouldn’t notice if it were, the car being so preoccupied with isolating you from your surroundings. 

It’s something of a shame then that having worked so hard to suspend you in its low-stress bubble, the new S-Class does such a mediocre job of convincing you it’s truly the place to be. Quite when OEMs will learn that screens, no matter how prodigious in inches nor how well integrated into a single piece of glass, do not, in fact, equate to ‘luxury’ is a continuing mystery, as is the idea that both front passengers need to be able to actually see their phones while they charge. Probably you’ll get to grips with the UI in short order, and most of what you really need is easy enough to find, but Mercedes might’ve won many more admirers if its imagination went beyond pandering to Chinese tastes.  

Or conceivably it thinks the view from the front seats is less important than the back. And by virtue of the fact that the S580e comes to the UK in ‘L’ format exclusively, that instinct might not be misplaced. At any rate, it’s deeply pleasant in the capacious rear, where the dreary fixed touchscreens ahead of you can be ignored completely, leaving you free to recline sun lounger-style, while the world drifts noiselessly by. Presumably some customers like to do work back there, but in the AMG Line Premium Plus trim tested, the S-Class works best as a leather-lined decompression chamber. Pop your bonce on the pillowy headrests and you’ll be power napping in minutes. 

Alternatively, if you do ever feel inclined to give your driver the afternoon off - and can be bothered to locate the S850e’s sportier drive modes - there is enough going on underneath to keep you awake. You’ll have to meet the steering halfway and obviously expect to take a large bite out of your MPG, but with the six-pot much more heavily involved and the chassis (subtly and very sensitively) knuckling down, you ought to have no issues sweeping confidently between the sighted corners of your driveway. To suggest it ever really comes alive would be overstating a very soft-edged sort of heavyweight vigour. But with four-wheel steering prominent among its many, many integrated gizmos, the latest S-Class is certainly not devoid of dynamic bandwidth. 

Ultimately, the main issue with selecting the hybrid is less about the car itself and more about the model directly adjacent to it. We haven’t driven the mild hybrid (i.e. predominately straight-six-powered) S 500 in the UK yet, although dispensing with plug-in status - and the accompanying 22kWh battery - saves it more than 300kg. Hence a 0.1-second difference in 0-62mph times despite it taking a 100-odd horsepower haircut. And the 185-litre improvement in boot space. And the £6k saving on list price. Which might not be of much interest to the powerfully built company directors amongst us, given its much loftier 191g/km CO2 emissions. But I bet you the cheapest EQS is the sweeter S-Class to drive. 


SPECIFICATION | 2026 MERCEDES-BENZ S580e L

Engine: 2,999cc, straight six turbo, 22kWh battery, electric motor
Transmission: 9-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 585
Torque (lb ft): 553
0-62mph: 4.4secs
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: from 2,618kg
MPG: up to 97.5 (up to 61 miles electric range)
CO2: from 66g/km
Price: £122,425 (AMG Line Premium; AMG Line Premium Plus £130,675, AMG Line Premium Plus Executive £135,675)

Author
Discussion

ex-devonpaul

Original Poster:

1,757 posts

168 months

My dad's Capri had more rear legroom than that.

WCZ

11,567 posts

225 months

nice

Krikkit

27,941 posts

212 months

ex-devonpaul said:
My dad's Capri had more rear legroom than that.
No, it didn't have 40+ inches of legroom

_Rodders_

5,075 posts

50 months

I feel like that dash will date badly. I thought it looked great when they launched it in the EQS but it already looks a bit old hat. Like there's 2 CRTs behind that glass panel.

Why couldn't they make it look like it was 1 panel that followed the curves of the glass.

_Rodders_

5,075 posts

50 months

Krikkit said:
ex-devonpaul said:
My dad's Capri had more rear legroom than that.
No, it didn't have 40+ inches of legroom
Is that 40+ inches in the room with us? Looks like less than 10 in the pictures.

Twoshoe

1,012 posts

215 months

_Rodders_ said:
Krikkit said:
ex-devonpaul said:
My dad's Capri had more rear legroom than that.
No, it didn't have 40+ inches of legroom
Is that 40+ inches in the room with us? Looks like less than 10 in the pictures.
And it's the long-wheelbase version!

LooneyTunes

9,500 posts

189 months

ex-devonpaul said:
My dad's Capri had more rear legroom than that.
It is rather baffling as to why they'd photograph the L with the front seats so far back. There must be a lot more legroom available than pictured?

Krikkit

27,941 posts

212 months

LooneyTunes said:
ex-devonpaul said:
My dad's Capri had more rear legroom than that.
It is rather baffling as to why they'd photograph the L with the front seats so far back. There must be a lot more legroom available than pictured?
Yep, terrible photos

Wills2

29,848 posts

206 months

Krikkit said:
ex-devonpaul said:
My dad's Capri had more rear legroom than that.
No, it didn't have 40+ inches of legroom
That only appears if you put the front passenger seat all the way forward and fold the seat back forward then the foot rest raises, probably do the same in a capri but without the foot rest. biggrin

LotusOmega375D

9,416 posts

184 months

Can MB please stop putting this badge on their cars? It’s so 1980s.


GeniusOfLove

5,870 posts

43 months

Shouldn't be too long until I'm in the back of one of these cruising past Hounslow, although it'll doubtless have black/black/black rather than that rather lovely dark green and tan. It'll be interesting to see if the interior cost cutting is as obvious as it was in the last one which was decidedly C class in far too many areas.

I'd forgotten about the EQS, I had high hopes before it launched that MB would show Tesla what a £100k+ luxury EV should be like but unfortunately the reverse seemed to be true when MB rolled out something with all the rear seat comfort of a Dacia. A well deserved commercial failure, that one.

I'm glad it still exists, even if all the other Jabba the Hutt barges have gone extinct or are on the extinction watchlist.

PistonTim

758 posts

170 months

Lack of rear legroom seemingly accentuated by a massive screen jutting into your face from the headrest in front of you.

Terrible photos as others have said.

mjspencer348

508 posts

6 months

I bet this rides like it should, the wheels and tyres look pretty modest by 2026 standards (standard fit: 255/45 R 19) and hard to imagine seeing another one in this colour and trim combo on UK roads. Agree on the rear legroom looking a bit tight, but probably fine in real life.

Kawasicki

14,411 posts

266 months

Another car that is risky to trust journalists opinions on. They see S-Class and then automatically think and write ultimate refinement/ride quality/high speed cruising. Then you drive one yourself.

DaveyBoyWonder

3,976 posts

205 months

ex-devonpaul said:
My dad's Capri had more rear legroom than that.
No it didn't.

EV8

674 posts

34 months

I am eyeing EQS for my next luxury transport... S class not so much. Or at all.
Nobody is buying limos anymore. That is why EQS SUV outsold normal EQS about atleast 2:1.

Alex_225

7,871 posts

232 months

I like that a lot actually. Their latest "design language" appears to suit the S Class more than it does a lot of other models in the Mercedes range. I don't even mind the tail lights even if they are a bit tacky.

Also, I think the colour inside and out are suitably opulent to work well on the S Class without being overly chavvy. I'm sure it can be spec'd in some awful combinations like some of the Rolls Royce's I've seen but overall I like that.

Edgey1

63 posts

61 months

Maybe a different target market to the Type 01 but such a staid, conservative design in comparison.

epom

15,076 posts

192 months

Nice colour.

cerb4.5lee

45,198 posts

211 months

There's always been something about the S-Class and 7 Series that attracts me to them. Lovely things to travel around in I reckon.