RE: £10k Mazda MX-5 (ND) | Spotted
RE: £10k Mazda MX-5 (ND) | Spotted
Today

£10k Mazda MX-5 (ND) | Spotted

You can't buy the fourth-gen MX-5 new anymore, but you can have one for four figures - what's stopping you?


There really is no time like the present for the Mazda MX-5. The 2.0-litre model is no longer available to order in the UK, and it’d be nothing short of a miracle if Mazda could repeat the same unfettered joy of the current car with a replacement. In the late '20s, anything as close to the ND in terms of simplicity, low mass and affordability would be astonishing. Even for Mazda, one of the best out there for taking on seemingly impossible tasks. 

And while it would be easy to point to a preregistered car with a saving, the ND2 update that really brought the best from the platform or a snazzy anniversary car, the MX-5’s value proposition has always been one of its main selling points. So here’s the first 2.0-litre Mk4 MX-5 we’ve seen at less than £10,000. Hang out the bunting and dig out the party poppers, it’s celebration time. Looks a good one, too. 

The 160hp Mk4 MX-5s weren’t perfect, granted. The 2.0-litre wasn’t quite as zingy as the 1.5 - or the 184hp update - but without anything like it just a decade later we’ll take a less-than-perfect 7,000rpm engine than none at all. Similarly, the chassis was a little too roly-poly to confidently exploit, but it’s far easier to overlook gripes when the 1,000kg two-seater is now less than £10k.

And there’s the modifying to think of, too, another key part of the MX-5’s appeal over the decades. While upgrades won’t have become any cheaper while the car has, there’s obviously no warranty to be concerned about at 10 years old. And as parts wear with age, so there’s the scope to get better replacements. From top to bottom and front to back, there’s huge potential to make the MX-5 into whatever you want. 

Indeed, it looks like someone has already made a start; the ride height here looks lower, the exhaust larger, the gearknob decidedly worse than standard. The numberplate and stickers would at least suggest enthusiast ownership, as would four matching tyres, so that’s good to see.

The mileage is low, both inside and outside look very smart, and we’ll almost be at British Summer Time before the next MOT is due. While it might have taken longer than expected for the best MX-5s to reach this money, without a direct replacement due it seems unlikely they’re going to sink towards Shed money anytime soon. Even the very cheapest 1.5 are eight grand. There’s never been a bad time for the ND, in truth, because it was the best MX-5 (in an all-round sense) ever made. But now it just looks that little bit more enticing.


SPECIFICATION | MAZDA MX-5 2.0 SE-L

Engine: 1,998cc, 4-cyl
Transmission: 6-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 160@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 148@4,600rpm
MPG: 40.9 (NEDC combined)
CO2: 161g/km
Year registered: 2016
Recorded mileage: 46,134
Price new: £20,095
Yours for: £9,995

See the original advert

Author
Discussion

V12GT

Original Poster:

679 posts

121 months

I'm quite surprised how slowly these have depreciated. In 2016, I bought an early (2006) NC for £3k, no rust and decent service history, although 80k miles. Even allowing for inflation, that would equate to a £5-6k car now. Ran it until 2023, without any problems.

Honeywell

1,681 posts

129 months

I have a 184hp Sport Tech in the lovely red. Undersealed from 700 miles old I've struggled for a year to justify replacing it with something else despite having ~£30k in cash waiting to add to its replacement.

Normally aspirated, RWD, Bilstein dampers, rear diff, manual (rifle bolt) gearbox, great build quality, never goes wrong, 40mpg, cheap to service/insure, looks good, sounds good with a £300 exhaust mod.

It's just too rationally good to justify spending £££ on something else other than for bragging rights. It's one of those cars that you'd look back and regret selling.

pb8g09

3,294 posts

100 months

Honeywell said:
I have a 184hp Sport Tech in the lovely red. Undersealed from 700 miles old I've struggled for a year to justify replacing it with something else despite having ~£30k in cash waiting to add to its replacement.

Normally aspirated, RWD, Bilstein dampers, rear diff, manual (rifle bolt) gearbox, great build quality, never goes wrong, 40mpg, cheap to service/insure, looks good, sounds good with a £300 exhaust mod.

It's just too rationally good to justify spending £££ on something else other than for bragging rights. It's one of those cars that you'd look back and regret selling.
Sounds like you’re ready for a trip to BBR…

Or America for the LS conversion….

Honeywell

1,681 posts

129 months

Yeah, could do that. But then £8000 spent on forced induction of the MX5 would be £8000 I could spend on a lightly used BMW 800GS adventure bike. The two spends seem disproportionate to me. More toys wins over who has the biggest toy.


hendo90

1 posts

119 months

After many years of lurking I'm compelled to break my silence in response to that question and say I'm slightly too tall to fit in one, which is extremely frustrating as they look great value for money.

speciald

213 posts

202 months

Having recently sold a Cayman to get something more sensible, one of these is high on the list for a fun car when I am in the position to get one.

Turbobanana

8,540 posts

232 months

I'm sure it's lovely and great value, but what a dull-looking thing in grey with grey wheels and grey interior. Was the first owner in a deep depression when they ordered it? You'd lose it on a foggy day.

DaveyBoyWonder

3,977 posts

205 months

I assumed NDs had been under 10k for years...

Fr0ggy

26 posts

37 months

Honeywell said:
Yeah, could do that. But then £8000 spent on forced induction of the MX5 would be £8000 I could spend on a lightly used BMW 800GS adventure bike. The two spends seem disproportionate to me. More toys wins over who has the biggest toy.
and that would ruin the original character of the car as well, making something it is not (could be 'better' though, depends on your interpretation of 'better'). BBR also do some non turbo mods but I get your point on a nearly new bike instead - that sounds like more value, especially if you are content with the car as you have it.