Moon news
Author
Discussion

Dakkon

Original Poster:

7,833 posts

283 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
In my hotal this morning there was a brief article on Nasa finding out something new about the moon, I only caught the headline.

Looking over the BBC website I can't find anything, does anyone know what it is Nasa have found.

Also, does anyone know better sites for Astrology / Space news?

big_treacle

1,727 posts

290 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
space.com

hedders

24,460 posts

277 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all

Eric Mc

125,716 posts

295 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
ASTROLOGY - wash your mouth out sir.

I think you mean ASTRONOMY.

Spaceflightnow.com is pretty hot with the latest space flight news although less so on astronomical news. Just do a google under "space news" or "astronomy news" and see what sites turn up.

NASA's own web sites are very good but absolutely VAST. The ESA site also has quite a lot of stuff.

simpo two

92,860 posts

295 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
hedders said:
www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/technology/12943817.htm ?


You have to register.


Why do they DO that?

chim_knee

12,689 posts

287 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
simpo two said:
Why do they DO that?
Price and sell advertising based on number of registered members?

Basically almost ANY situation that causes you to think "why do they do that... surely it'd be simpler if..." is usually down to how to make more money.

B17NNS

18,506 posts

277 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
Nasa Man said:
I can indeed confirm that these core samples taken from the moon are very cheesy


timmy30

9,325 posts

257 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
Maybe they've struck oil up there?

fazz81

324 posts

265 months

Eric Mc

125,716 posts

295 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
Striking water (or water ice, at least) would be far more useful than oil.

mutt k

3,964 posts

268 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
Perhaps that's where Saddam hid his WMD then?

Eric Mc

125,716 posts

295 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
No that was the Yanks - they hid a B-29 there (the one discovered by "The Sunday Sport"

kerfuffle

5,253 posts

284 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
They found Jon Dokic waxing his McLaren

chim_knee

12,689 posts

287 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Striking water (or water ice, at least) would be far more useful than oil.
Serious questions - doesn't a planet/body need an atmosphere to have water?

that's not meant as a challenge to your post BTW - just an enquiry

timmy30

9,325 posts

257 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
chim_knee said:

Eric Mc said:
Striking water (or water ice, at least) would be far more useful than oil.

Serious questions - doesn't a planet/body need an atmosphere to have water?

that's not meant as a challenge to your post BTW - just an enquiry


Not if it's frozen water.

chim_knee

12,689 posts

287 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
timmy30 said:
Not if it's frozen water.
Would it have needed an atomsphere in the first place though?

Eric Mc

125,716 posts

295 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
Liquid water on the surface (to maintain sufficient pressure to prevent frozen water subliming directly into a gas) - yes.

Liquid water underground (expected situation on Europa and Iapetus)- no .

Frozen water on the surface (Mars' polar caps)- no .

Frozen water underground - (expected on Mars)no .

Edited for follow up question from Chim Knee -

Not necessarilly. Comets are almost entirely made from frozen water and a comet prbably never had an atmosphere in its entire life.
Water is everywhere in the universe. In 99.9999 instances it is in the form of water ice. The rest of the time it is mainly a gas with only very rare occurences where it can flow in liquid form. we know it does this on Earth and there are strong indications that it has done so on Mars too.



>> Edited by Eric Mc on Thursday 20th October 10:22

roadsweeper

3,789 posts

304 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
The news article you mention may have related to an eminent scientist claiming it is now time for the UK to lift the ban on manned space flight because there are valid scientific rewards for pursuing a space programme.

Eric Mc

125,716 posts

295 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
I didn't know Britain had "banned" manned space flight. I just thought we couldn't afford such ventures.

mutt k

3,964 posts

268 months

Thursday 20th October 2005
quotequote all
roadsweeper said:
it is now time for the UK to lift the ban on manned space flight because there are valid scientific rewards for pursuing a space programme.


Not to mention that we could also exile all the ASBO'd chavs and the surplus of one legged black Jewish lesbian lentilists so beloved of our glorious government to the third rock from the sun. Oh and Prescott, Brunstrom and all the others of their ilk could go too!

better go and hide. Probably offended someone now!