4.3 or 500 for Sprinting ?

4.3 or 500 for Sprinting ?

Author
Discussion

lazyitus

Original Poster:

19,926 posts

267 months

Tuesday 12th November 2002
quotequote all
Any good advice on which of these two (4.3 or 500) would be the best for Sprinting? I know the 500 is quicker but would you notice much difference on a tight twisty track or hillclimb ?

GreenV8S

30,208 posts

285 months

Tuesday 12th November 2002
quotequote all

Any good advice on which of these two (4.3 or 500) would be the best for Sprinting? I know the 500 is quicker but would you notice much difference on a tight twisty track or hillclimb ?


500 - it's all down to torque!

Whereabouts are you sprinting?

Cheers,
Peter Humphries (and a green V8S)
Coordinator, TVRCC Speed Championship

simpo one

85,475 posts

266 months

Tuesday 12th November 2002
quotequote all
Who am I to argue with the mighty Green V8S, but comparing my 4.0 and 500, I know which I'd rather push over a twisty road of uncertain nature - and it's not the 500! The more pliable handling and faster Rover box of the 4.0 win it for me.

(into bunker)

>> Edited by simpo one on Tuesday 12th November 20:54

angusfaldo

2,790 posts

275 months

Tuesday 12th November 2002
quotequote all
If by sprinting we can assume you want to go faster and not slower, then there's only one choice, the 500.

So there.

ByronTVR

332 posts

285 months

Wednesday 13th November 2002
quotequote all
a 500 is A 500...more power&torque

ByronTVR

simpo one

85,475 posts

266 months

Wednesday 13th November 2002
quotequote all
500 better for track, yes. But on your average bumpy twisty road, I'm not so sure - the handling is so different and I'm not Colin McRae! Do you really want to feel the back end going when you drive over a cat's eye?

jamer

1,329 posts

292 months

Wednesday 13th November 2002
quotequote all
500 is the King

Better box, better Diff, better built

kevinday

11,640 posts

281 months

Thursday 14th November 2002
quotequote all

simpo one said: Who am I to argue with the mighty Green V8S, but comparing my 4.0 and 500, I know which I'd rather push over a twisty road of uncertain nature - and it's not the 500! The more pliable handling and faster Rover box of the 4.0 win it for me.

(into bunker)

>> Edited by simpo one on Tuesday 12th November 20:54



I suggest you get the steering and suspension settings checked out if your 500 feels much worse than the 4 litre.

gerjo

1,627 posts

283 months

Thursday 14th November 2002
quotequote all
Indeed it is strange that some of us feel that a 4.x's handling is better (on bumpy roads) than a 500. This may be caused by the anti-roll bar at the back which is "standard" on most 500's which makes it a bit bumpier. However, having owned a 4.3 and now a 500 I must say there is a big difference in handling, in favour of the 500. Also, the back of my 4.3 stepped out far easier than on my current 500.

shpub

8,507 posts

273 months

Friday 15th November 2002
quotequote all
500. No comparison. Stops and goes better. Handles better.
If you want the ultimate I would recommend a lightly modified 520SE wedge. Makes my 500 feel like a diesel....

Steve

Johno

8,423 posts

283 months

Friday 15th November 2002
quotequote all
I do not have the hours and hours behind the wheels of various aged, engine sized and differing Griffiths that some of you guys have... but ....

The 500 I have sticks to the road like sh1t to a blanket and when I took a friend out who had previously had a '94 500 (now as a Caterham SLR400 )round Anglesey he could not believe how much grip it generated and how hard it could be used. The ability to get the power down and the corner speed it would maintain. Additionally to that how manageable it was when it was being pushed V. hard.

I cannot see any argument for having a less powerful engined, less developed chassissed and less effectively braked car in preference to one which delivers all of the above better....

D'oh !



GreenV8S

30,208 posts

285 months

Friday 15th November 2002
quotequote all


Makes my 500 feel like a diesel....

Steve



Oh no, you haven't been running it on cooking oil again have you Steve?

simpo one

85,475 posts

266 months

Friday 15th November 2002
quotequote all
Kevin Day wrote: 'I suggest you get the steering and suspension settings checked out if your 500 feels much worse than the 4 litre.'

Yes, I had poly bushes fitted and the cambers etc were a bit out. Now back within spec. But I didn't say it was worse, simply much firmer. Not so suited to bumpy country lanes, that's all. Not so pliant.

shpub

8,507 posts

273 months

Saturday 16th November 2002
quotequote all



Oh no, you haven't been running it on cooking oil again have you Steve?


Nope... been using genuine Blackpool chip shop fat...



>> Edited by shpub on Saturday 16th November 09:54

ByronTVR

332 posts

285 months

Wednesday 20th November 2002
quotequote all
Griffith 500...TOP!

ByronTVR

joospeed

4,473 posts

279 months

Wednesday 20th November 2002
quotequote all

simpo one said: Kevin Day wrote: 'I suggest you get the steering and suspension settings checked out if your 500 feels much worse than the 4 litre.'

Yes, I had poly bushes fitted and the cambers etc were a bit out. Now back within spec. But I didn't say it was worse, simply much firmer. Not so suited to bumpy country lanes, that's all. Not so pliant.



what firmness of poly bush did you use? .. most of the ones I've seen fitted to TVRs are waaaaaaay softer than the std bush ... worse location. I use poly bushes sometimes but they are almost solid - those are what you need.

simpo one

85,475 posts

266 months

Wednesday 20th November 2002
quotequote all
Don't know the spec but they are purple and were fitted by Offord. I said that the steering was very heavy and Simon diagnosed the bushes, as the wishbone arms were at the front of the mounting, not central. Who was I to disagree? However, I've subsequently learned that thrust washers might have done the same job for much less cost. Interestingly only the top bushes were done - is this normal?