Bernoulli question
Author
Discussion

speedy_thrills

Original Poster:

7,959 posts

273 months

Wednesday 9th November 2005
quotequote all
I’ve been doing some revision from past exam questions and I can across this one question which I really just cant get a solution to so I was hoping that I could throw it open to the forum to have a go. The question states:

A vertical pipe carrying liquid of sp. gr. 0.83 upwards from a pump contracts gradually from dia. 105mm to dia. 35mm over a length of 0.45m. A water manometer (U-tube) is connected to two points 0.6m apart in two sections of the pipe and the head difference registered in two sections of the pipe and the head difference is 0.43m. The connecting pipes to the manometer (U-tube) are filled with a liquid that is flowing. Find the rate of flow in dm^3/min. Ignore energy losses.

I’m a bit embarrassed really, it should be an easy question.

Frik

13,690 posts

273 months

Wednesday 9th November 2005
quotequote all
Fluid Mechanics!

Run for the hills!

Where the head is greater

>> Edited by Frik on Wednesday 9th November 23:08

hiasakite

2,553 posts

277 months

Wednesday 9th November 2005
quotequote all
I think- if I remember bernoullis is pv1^2+ph1+P1=pv2^2+ph2+P2

therfore p(v1^2-v2^2)=P2-P1+ p(h2-h1)

where p= density
vN=velocity at point N (point 1 or 2)
PN= pressure at point N
hN= height at point N, there for h1-h2= the distance

also-
conservation of mass=
pv1A1=pv2A2 (for incompressible fluid)

Where AN=area at point N

You end up with v1^2-V2^2=alpha
and v1/v2=beta

Which should be solveable.. obviously you need to sort out your units to ensure they are all SI

>> Edited by hiasakite on Wednesday 9th November 23:12

>> Edited by hiasakite on Wednesday 9th November 23:13

bosscerbera

8,188 posts

273 months

Wednesday 9th November 2005
quotequote all
About 5?

GreenV8S

31,024 posts

314 months

Wednesday 9th November 2005
quotequote all
I'm not going to do the sums (because I'd only go and get them wrong) but I think you need to work out the dynamic pressure drop (difference between half Rho V squared before/after, isn't it?) and then subtract the pressure difference due to gravity (I'd hazard a guess at Rho G H).

>> Edited by GreenV8S on Wednesday 9th November 23:12

speedy_thrills

Original Poster:

7,959 posts

273 months

Wednesday 9th November 2005
quotequote all
GreenV8S said:
I'm not going to do the sums (because I'd only go and get them wrong) but I think you need to work out the dynamic pressure drop (difference between half Rho V squared before/after, isn't it?) and then subtract the pressure difference due to gravity (I'd hazard a guess at Rho G H).
Well I can work out the head difference in the U-tube but I just cant figure out how to fix the dimensions of the U-tube to the pipe. Until I establish this I don’t see how I can establish flow or dynamics pressure changed.

alfaman

6,416 posts

264 months

Wednesday 9th November 2005
quotequote all
speedy_thrills said:
GreenV8S said:
I'm not going to do the sums (because I'd only go and get them wrong) but I think you need to work out the dynamic pressure drop (difference between half Rho V squared before/after, isn't it?) and then subtract the pressure difference due to gravity (I'd hazard a guess at Rho G H).
Well I can work out the head difference in the U-tube but I just cant figure out how to fix the dimensions of the U-tube to the pipe. Until I establish this I don’t see how I can establish flow or dynamics pressure changed.


The exact position of the u tube doesn't matter - just assume its before and after the constriction - the head difference purely attributable to static pressure differences would be 0.6m*0.83 , converted to relevant units, the rest of the pressure diff will be due to velocity changes - hence solveable .

Not sure where my old 2nd year Fluid Mech textbooks and notes are - I'll see if I can dig them out tomorrow if you havn't solved it by then -( sorry I can't remember the equations from 20 yrs ago )

bosscerbera

8,188 posts

273 months

Thursday 10th November 2005
quotequote all
I said:
About 5?

Am I close?

towman

14,938 posts

269 months

Thursday 10th November 2005
quotequote all
I had a Bernoulli once - had to send it back due to the missfire on pot 6. Bloody italian supercars.

speedy_thrills

Original Poster:

7,959 posts

273 months

Thursday 10th November 2005
quotequote all
bosscerbera said:
I said:
About 5?

Am I close?
They say about 76.4 dm^3/min, maybe a few glasses of wine will help me?

swanboy

296 posts

276 months

Thursday 10th November 2005
quotequote all
I was never any good at fluid dynamics, but for some reason i remember Bernoulli's equation

P + (1/2)pv2 + pvh

where
P = Pressure
p = density
v = velocity
h = height

Since fluid is incompressible, this will be equal for 2 points in a flow.

So if you know v(1) and the change in h, you should be able to calculate v(2)?

I'm not going to attempt the maths, but let me know if it works?

speedy_thrills

Original Poster:

7,959 posts

273 months

Thursday 10th November 2005
quotequote all
speedy_thrills said:
bosscerbera said:
I said:
About 5?

Am I close?
They say about 76.4 dm^3/min, maybe a few glasses of wine will help me?


I’ll go and hunt down a lecturer tomorrow, thanks for your help any way.

swanboy

296 posts

276 months

Thursday 10th November 2005
quotequote all
speedy_thrills said:
speedy_thrills said:
bosscerbera said:
I said:
About 5?

Am I close?
They say about 76.4 dm^3/min, maybe a few glasses of wine will help me?


I’ll go and hunt down a lecturer tomorrow, thanks for your help any way.


damn, i was close pgh not pvh

magnum

161 posts

275 months

Friday 11th November 2005
quotequote all
Any Aeronautical engineers here?

puggit

49,820 posts

278 months

Friday 11th November 2005
quotequote all
magnum said:
Any Aeronautical engineers here?
One failed aero engineer here

Started at Bristol Uni in October one year and lasted until around February. Changed to Chemistry, Quantum Physics is far easier.

Fluid mechanics was one of the key reasons I quit!

whirly

234 posts

301 months

Friday 11th November 2005
quotequote all
speedy_thrills said:
speedy_thrills said:
bosscerbera said:
I said:
About 5?

Am I close?
They say about 76.4 dm^3/min, maybe a few glasses of wine will help me?


I’ll go and hunt down a lecturer tomorrow, thanks for your help any way.


Use the continuity of mass mdot=pAC to determine the proportions of C1 and C2 and you should be pretty much there. Try it in reality and you will be about 25% off, but that's real life!!!

8

1,423 posts

293 months

Friday 11th November 2005
quotequote all
I did this stuff in first year and unsurprisingly I can't remember any of it.

I had a physics of fluids lecture today on turbulent boundary layers. Which was fun.

danielgray

668 posts

252 months

Friday 11th November 2005
quotequote all
im doing this at Bristol uni at the moment and its not the easiest subject to get to grips with.

puggit

49,820 posts

278 months

Friday 11th November 2005
quotequote all
danielgray said:
im doing this at Bristol uni at the moment and its not the easiest subject to get to grips with.
Good luck - you'll need it

Frik

13,690 posts

273 months

Friday 11th November 2005
quotequote all
puggit said:
danielgray said:
im doing this at Bristol uni at the moment and its not the easiest subject to get to grips with.
Good luck - you'll need it
Yeah. Stick with it - plenty of boring (and 'kin hard) stuff at the beginning but it does get better.

Good luck