20% of ANPR readings incorrect in trial...
20% of ANPR readings incorrect in trial...
Author
Discussion

ed22

Original Poster:

190 posts

261 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
Although I have no time whatsoever for Mr Brake and his works, this is kind of worrying, esp as ANPR looks to be the mechanism of choice to make sure we all get nice and wound-up doing 70mph on our m'ways...

[url]www.libdems.org.uk/news/police-spy-camera-scheme-needs-improvement-brake.html[/url]

john57

1,869 posts

258 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
It's a computer ..... yes it does sometimes get it wrong - which is why we always merely look at the screen to make sure it has read correctly. It's not difficult to do and not a problem.

I check every number before stopping anyone - you need to make sure it has read correctly and then need to know what the car is known for. I don't want to go stopping someone straight away who may have a gun ! The press release by the Liberals is just going to worry people needlessly..... but then again it does refer to them as 'spy cameras' ! Rather these 'spy cameras' than speed type ones ......

off_again

13,917 posts

264 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
Actually the technology is rather good - the ability to "read" plates of all types and sizes (including Alfa 156's - contrary to the urban myth). The issue is that the process and database behind it is at fault. Take buying a new car - you buy it, you register it (well the dealer does), you tax it too.... but maybe its at a post office - perfectly legal and fair, but the record of your car doesnt appear until a week or so after you are on the road. It gets worse when you have transfered a private plate too.... all perfectly legal and reasonable, but ANPR would flag your car as "caution" or red and hence you get a tug....

Or what will most likely happen, is that the operator presses the ESC button to move on to the next car its just read. 20% incorrect is a pretty big underestimation too. How many V5's have you had which are incorrect in some part of the data? How many V5's does the DVLA loose and what percentage of the data is just plain wrong? Internal estimates at the DVLA place this at 40% or even more!!!!!

ANPR is great at picking up untaxed / no MOT / scrapped cars - its also great at keeping track of "watchlist" motors too. But for the wholescale introduction of ANPR - its a waste of time. Unfortunately many groups see this is as the panecea of all evils on the road. It aint that simple and fundamentally we need to change our taxation (RFL) and licensing structure to cope with what they are proposing..... which wont happen for at least a couple of years.

Its good, but it aint that good.

voyds9

8,490 posts

313 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
It's good to know this technology is so accurate. This is the same technology that supposedly will be rolling out every 400yards through Britain. So I could probably be in Inverness and Truro at the same time, could be intersting in the new road pricing scheme.

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

278 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
john57 said:
It's a computer ..... yes it does sometimes get it wrong - which is why we always merely look at the screen to make sure it has read correctly. It's not difficult to do and not a problem.


Which is fine when someone is checking it. But I'd argue that the information in this article suggests having a human reading the 50 million plates a day is a little unrealistic....

ed22

Original Poster:

190 posts

261 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
john57 said:
Rather these 'spy cameras' than speed type ones ......


If only that were true!

It seems that the ideas to use SPECS type technology to add that to the ANPR output.....

<stolen from another thread...apologies>

[url]www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/15/vehicle_movement_database/[/url]

smeggy

3,241 posts

269 months

Wednesday 16th November 2005
quotequote all
All a determinmed criminal needs to do is steal or clone a plate of a law abiding owner; you don't need to be a criminal mastermind to solve that one

polus

4,343 posts

255 months

Wednesday 16th November 2005
quotequote all
smeggy said:
All a determinmed criminal needs to do is steal or clone a plate of a law abiding owner; you don't need to be a criminal mastermind to solve that one


There not interested in criminals - theres no money in it!