Notice Period
Author
Discussion

nick heppinstall

Original Poster:

9,084 posts

310 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
Mate of mine will be leaving his current job shortly ( very large company )but it says in his contract he has to work 3 months notice. Can they hold him to this. The Boss seems to think she can. The last 3 people to leave only worked 1 month and were doing the same job.

dazren

22,612 posts

291 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
If it's in his contract of employment they can make him do the three months. Wether they want to keep him around is another matter.

DAZ

rich1231

17,340 posts

290 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
If he signed a contract that said this then, he should work it.

Most companies will usually want you out the door on gardening leave to limit the damage you could do but also limit the value of information you might pass to a competitor (as it will be out of date.

It's a contract, both parties signed it, both parties should stick to it.

spdpug98

1,551 posts

252 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
Left my last company about 6 months ago, I had to work my 3 months notice, and even had to interview my replacement.

Whoozit

3,881 posts

299 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
As already posted, will have to do so if it's in the contract. There may be a get-out if as you say equivalent personnel only have one month in their contract - I think this counts as unreasonable restraint of trade, but I'm not an employment lawyer. Sounds like he might need some expert advice.

themaskedavenger

676 posts

278 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
if its in the contract then yes they can, best thing to do is to try and negociate out of the 3 months.

"I dont want to be here I want to move on, if you really insist then I will turn up for the next 3 months"

It happened to me before and my boss did it to me to try and make life difficult so I went to her boss and negociated at that level.

3 months notice can be both a blessing and a curse if they want to get rid of you its that much more money for you so it can work both ways.

Alternativtly the new hiring company may be able to get references and stuff done fast and say OK we are all set now just need you to turn up.. Then just stop turning up at the old place and turn up at the new. he might be on emergency tax and will be on his old record as being fired for not turning up but depends on if you care about that or not.

nick heppinstall

Original Poster:

9,084 posts

310 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
Whoozit said:
As already posted, will have to do so if it's in the contract. There may be a get-out if as you say equivalent personnel only have one month in their contract - I think this counts as unreasonable restraint of trade, but I'm not an employment lawyer. Sounds like he might need some expert advice.


The others that left also had 3 months in their contract but the company let them leave after a month. Would their be some kind of precedent set ?

cosmoschick

7,977 posts

279 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
dazren said:
If it's in his contract of employment they can make him do the three months. Wether they want to keep him around is another matter.

DAZ




If the company want him to go any earlier then they will pay in lieu of notice. It's always worth trying to negotiate with your boss, but make sure everything that is agreed is put in writing.

bga

8,134 posts

281 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
nick heppinstall said:


The others that left also had 3 months in their contract but the company let them leave after a month. Would their be some kind of precedent set ?


AFAIK it's up to the company on an individual basis. They signed up to 3 months notice & should have the decency to sit it out if requested.

bigandclever

14,396 posts

268 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
Aren't these situations only ever about negotiation? Both parties sign up for 3 months (presumably) so both parties have to abide by that, worst case.

In a nutshell, the 2 situations are:

I want to leave my company, can I leave early? Yes with agreement go whenever, or No stay till the end of notice period.
Or
My company wants to leave me, can they get me to leave early? Yes with agreement go whenever with payment in lieu of notice, or No stay till the end of the notice period.

Or have I massively over-complicated the options....?

cotty

42,248 posts

314 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
themaskedavenger said:
"I dont want to be here I want to move on, if you really insist then I will turn up for the next 3 months" .


Says nothing about actually working, im currently in the middle of a 3 month notice period and my daily posting on PH has jumped quite a bit

mondeoman

11,430 posts

296 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
At the end of the day, its completely un-enforceable...

If he REALLY wants to leave and start at the new company, just go. The old company CANNOT force him to work for him , the best they could expect, if they took it to court, would be the judge ordering him not to work for the new company. but, very difficult to enforce.

The best solution is to take it as high up the ladder as he can and negotiate out of it ie I want to leave, you don't have to pay me, just let me go. If they insist on him staying, he'll do bugger all anyway and it'll be bad for hte rest of the team.

If I was in the old companies position, as soon as someone said they wanted out, I'd let them go. No-one is THAT critical to a business that they cant be replaced, one way or another.

Balmoral Green

42,561 posts

278 months

Tuesday 15th November 2005
quotequote all
Blimey, you guys are very committed, even when you arent and you decide to leave. The most notice I have ever served is as long as it takes to clear my desk, get my stuff out of the company motor and call a cab. Certainly a lot longer than the decision to leave anyway (Never been sacked though )