Lambo......to good to be true!

Lambo......to good to be true!

Author
Discussion

djt77

Original Poster:

270 posts

240 months

Wednesday 14th December 2005
quotequote all
Posted this on the general forum earlier but guess it would have been best here!

the car on the link is a diablo with a buy now of £36,500, mentions it was a cat c vadalise damage! anyone here know of this car and what does vadalise damage consist of? guess it must be quite substantial to write it off?

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&

rico

7,917 posts

270 months

Wednesday 14th December 2005
quotequote all
Sounds dodgy.

What kind of idiot puts...

idiot said:
THIS VEHICLE EASILY SELLS ON AUTO TRADER FOR ABOVE THE £45000 MARK


... yet doesn't want to sell it 'easily' on autotrader for an extra £8500...

andysv

1,350 posts

242 months

Wednesday 14th December 2005
quotequote all
never seen this before, maybe alan is aware of it? it sure is cheap so long as it's mechanically sound with maintenance history. abs on a 93 car that's a first? abs was 98 on.

>> Edited by andysv on Wednesday 14th December 22:35

rubystone

11,254 posts

274 months

Thursday 15th December 2005
quotequote all
I guess if someone jumped on it then that might be bad enough to write off the car, especially given the fact that this occurred 2 years ago when the car may have been worth £50k. A yellow Diablo came up for sale a couple of years ago at cheap money and ISTR a figure of a smidge over £20k buying it, but I could be £10k out! - it needed a repaint though and had some dings....

ruttboy

595 posts

241 months

Thursday 15th December 2005
quotequote all
NO SUCH THING AS A CHEAP LAMBO!

octane

205 posts

244 months

Thursday 15th December 2005
quotequote all
ruttboy said:
NO SUCH THING AS A CHEAP LAMBO!


Unless one is selling ones Lambo to a Lambo dealer in which case it is cheap!

andysv

1,350 posts

242 months

Friday 16th December 2005
quotequote all

Unless one is selling ones Lambo to a Lambo dealer in which case it is cheap![/quote]


dezza87

971 posts

236 months

Friday 16th December 2005
quotequote all
andysv said:
abs on a 93 car that's a first? abs was 98 on.

>> Edited by andysv on Wednesday 14th December 22:35


thats where you are wrong andysv. I had a 1.6l fiesta ghia built in 95 which had abs fitted as an option.

Craig

1,197 posts

299 months

Friday 16th December 2005
quotequote all
dezza87 said:
andysv said:
abs on a 93 car that's a first? abs was 98 on.

>> Edited by andysv on Wednesday 14th December 22:35


thats where you are wrong andysv. I had a 1.6l fiesta ghia built in 95 which had abs fitted as an option.


think he is talking about Diablos...

egomeister

7,182 posts

278 months

Friday 16th December 2005
quotequote all
dezza87 said:
andysv said:
abs on a 93 car that's a first? abs was 98 on.

>> Edited by andysv on Wednesday 14th December 22:35


thats where you are wrong andysv. I had a 1.6l fiesta ghia built in 95 which had abs fitted as an option.


But this thread's about a lambo not a fiesta

nightmare

5,272 posts

299 months

Friday 16th December 2005
quotequote all
of mild interest. Lamborghini held off putting ABS on diablos a lot longer than many mainstream manufacturers following a fairly severe crash during testing. As i recall.....the driver turned into a corner, at speed with the ABS pulsing.... one wheel left the ground which then confused the system and it stopped braking and car hit wall. something along those lines anyway. They elft it till 98 when there weer several different and more advanced systems