Duel core Processors
Author
Discussion

White_van_man

Original Poster:

3,848 posts

279 months

Saturday 24th December 2005
quotequote all
What is the advantage of duel core processors. Im about to build a new pc, i was wondeing if its worth getting duel core? i dont play games on the pc mainly photo editing in photoshop. Would i be better off with the fastest single core processor out there or a slightly slower duel core processor?
Thanks for you help
WVM

ThatPhilBrettGuy

11,810 posts

270 months

Saturday 24th December 2005
quotequote all
Dual cores work great with Photoshop. Once you've had more than one processor you can never go back....I'd always go for 2 slightly slower than one fast processor.

bigdods

7,175 posts

257 months

Saturday 24th December 2005
quotequote all
Agreed - go dual core if the application supports it you will find it a whole lot quicker than a single core.

White_van_man

Original Poster:

3,848 posts

279 months

Saturday 24th December 2005
quotequote all
how does the duel core work, what is its advantages over a single core.

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

295 months

Saturday 24th December 2005
quotequote all
White_van_man said:
how does the duel core work, what is its advantages over a single core.


Dual Core is simply 2 cpu 'brains' in one CPU.

Its like having 2 Engines under the bonnet, instead of one.

J

Neezer

391 posts

258 months

Monday 26th December 2005
quotequote all
Dual cores give you better performance in 'multithread' programs like Photoshop appears to be -these are designed to make use of 2 cpu's to spread the workload.

Most games at the moment are only programmed to use 1 cpu core at a time, so 2 processor cores will not give you any performance boost over one core.

However, if you are running lots of background applications like Antivirus programs and perhaps ripping a few MP3's while playing a game you will get a better overall system performance because windows delegates the work to the different processors.

In other words: 2 cores are better than one! Unless you play current games on a crap free pc..

p.s new games coming out in 2006 will probably start to use both cores, so its a good way to future proof your pc as well!

aldi

9,288 posts

267 months

Monday 26th December 2005
quotequote all
Intel probablly won't be selling any non dual-core cpu's after another 12 months or so, so its definaley the way forward.

tvrforever

3,196 posts

295 months

Monday 26th December 2005
quotequote all
White_van_man said:
What is the advantage of duel core processors.


Duel cores fight a fair bit - gate to gate so to speak...

Dual cores however give about 1.6 times the throughput of the original CPU but there's a lot of fud to watch for here, some only have a single FPU others dual, some only have single shared cache others dual etc.

In short though it's a bit faster although not as fast as two CPUs - as these always have dual cache etc But multi-processor computing always gets a bit more complex - you should try it with the 64 & 124 cpu systems we have to plan for

Oh and they're never fast enough

hut49

3,544 posts

292 months

Monday 26th December 2005
quotequote all
Assuming use for general office applications, VHS video capture, video editing, transfer to DVD - occasional gaming, would you go for a Pentium 4 3.40 GHz or a Pentium D 2.80 GHz?

What other features for a new system would you spec? How important is the video card in this type of use?

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

295 months

Monday 26th December 2005
quotequote all
hut49 said:
Assuming use for general office applications, VHS video capture, video editing, transfer to DVD - occasional gaming, would you go for a Pentium 4 3.40 GHz or a Pentium D 2.80 GHz?

What other features for a new system would you spec? How important is the video card in this type of use?



Video Editing alone, Dual Core.

As Phill_996_gonna_get_ya_Brett says, Dual > Similar Single any time, simply as it IS more powerful. So long as the price isnt 2x as much, i'd go Dual Core.

J

White_van_man

Original Poster:

3,848 posts

279 months

Monday 26th December 2005
quotequote all
i think i will go for the duel core as i want the system to last for a few years i think i have decided on a AMD 3.6gig duel core processor with 2 gig or ram 250gig SATA drive the rest hasnt been decided yet will see how far my bedget takes me

ErnestM

11,621 posts

297 months

Tuesday 27th December 2005
quotequote all
Ultimate video editing processor is the Intel Pentium Extreme (Dual Core plus hyperthreading = 4 virtual CPU's) and Adobe Premier Pro. Your system will blaze through rendering jobs (2gig of fast ram at a minimum as well - plus a boatload of storage)

ErnestM

White_van_Man

Original Poster:

3,848 posts

279 months

Friday 27th January 2006
quotequote all
Well iv taken the plunge i should get my hands on the new pc tonight, 4.2gig Athlon duel core, 2 gig ram, asus motherboard and a 250gig SATA HD my mate is currently installing everything for me and hes now refusing to give it back because it to fast for me to handle

mr_yogi

3,288 posts

285 months

Friday 27th January 2006
quotequote all
nice setup , what video card have you got?

BTW the athlon 64 4200 doesn't run at 4.2 GHz, it runs at 2.2GHz. Even the FX60 only runs at 2.8GHz

ErnestM

11,621 posts

297 months

Friday 27th January 2006
quotequote all
Intel info on dual core (click the demo on the right side):
www.intel.com/products/processor/pentiumXE/index.htm

Also - I highly recommend the GeForce 7800 GTX 512 card. Installed one recently and it's incredible (I would have said awesome but apparently people from the States say that too much according to ShadyTree). Here's a screen grab from a demo I ran with the card:




ErnestM

stuh

2,557 posts

303 months

Friday 27th January 2006
quotequote all
ErnestM said:
Intel info on dual core (click the demo on the right side):
www.intel.com/products/processor/pentiumXE/index.htm

Also - I highly recommend the GeForce 7800 GTX 512 card. Installed one recently and it's incredible (I would have said awesome but apparently people from the States say that too much according to ShadyTree). Here's a screen grab from a demo I ran with the card:




ErnestM


ErnestM - As you're stateside i thought you might have gone with the new Dell 600 "Renegade" !

Quad 7800

www.gamespot.com/news/6141912.html

ErnestM

11,621 posts

297 months

Friday 27th January 2006
quotequote all
I actually just build my own (although the Dell does look tasty).

I upgraded to the 7800 because I am thinking of ordering the new Dell 30 inch flat panel wide screen:


It requires a dual link DVI card to operate. It should be sweet for video editing and photoshopping...


ErnestM

stuh

2,557 posts

303 months

Friday 27th January 2006
quotequote all
ErnestM said:
I actually just build my own (although the Dell does look tasty).

I upgraded to the 7800 because I am thinking of ordering the new Dell 30 inch flat panel wide screen:


It requires a dual link DVI card to operate. It should be sweet for video editing and photoshopping...


ErnestM


I run dual link for my current setup. The Dell 30" looks good though

White_van_man

Original Poster:

3,848 posts

279 months

Friday 27th January 2006
quotequote all
mr_yogi said:
nice setup , what video card have you got?

BTW the athlon 64 4200 doesn't run at 4.2 GHz, it runs at 2.2GHz. Even the FX60 only runs at 2.8GHz


its an oboard one but its running an nvidia chipset. Thats as much as i know im a bit useless when it comes to computers

Zad

13,020 posts

266 months

Saturday 28th January 2006
quotequote all
Erk, onboard video with a cpu like that hot momma? That's like, erm, erm. Running a DB9 on Austin Allegro tyres. Or something. Seriously though, onboard video is notoriously slllooowwww and your setup deserves better.

By the way, 7800GTXs are only 10% faster than 7800GTs and cost approximately twice as much. Which is fine if you after ultimate performance, but in terms of bangs-per-buck it's horrendous.