Police may get right to enter sex offenders' homes

[Matthew-TMM]

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/12/28/npolice28.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/12/28/ixnewstop.html

So it's fine for the council to force themselves into your house so they can charge you more council tax, while police being given rights to check up on potentially dangerous sex offenders is against their human rights? Surely something is wrong here.

[matchless]

seems to depend nowadays on whether any money is to be made or not

[toni896]

Nearly 29,000 convicted people are on the sex offenders' register. Of those, 626 are regarded as high risk, and a further 547 are violent offenders who need close supervision in the community.

if they that bad shouldn't they be locked up ?

[Boosted Ls1]

toni896 said:

Nearly 29,000 convicted people are on the sex offenders' register. Of those, 626 are regarded as high risk, and a further 547 are violent offenders who need close supervision in the community. if they that bad shouldn't they be locked up ?

Yes, I agree but it costs money. When they have made a few more millions from camera's they may spend a few thousand on prisons.

Boosted.