Before you take a family photo.....(poss NSFW)
Before you take a family photo.....(poss NSFW)
Author
Discussion

MRS BOOST EM

Original Poster:

4,100 posts

252 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
Check whats going on around you!!
(Haven't been on here for ages bet you have seen this before, so awaits onslaught of )

http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d77/maleryknox/Fam






No need to have it embedded on the page. If anyone wants to see it bad enough, click on the link

>> Edited by Mrs Fish on Friday 13th January 08:57

timmy30

9,325 posts

257 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
am I the only one to spot the odd resemblence between the woman on the rights nose and the chap on the far rights todger?

Jaglover

46,818 posts

265 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all


Funny, but if Mrs Fish is being impartial she should bin it

rude-boy

22,227 posts

263 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
Jaglover said:


Funny, but if Mrs Fish is being impartial she should bin it


Agreed, equal rights please

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
Phil might at least have sat up for the photo.

tonyhetherington

32,091 posts

280 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
I edited your title and put an (18) on it to be sure. Thanks.

Darth Dave

2,253 posts

262 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
timmy30 said:
am I the only one to spot the odd resemblence between the woman on the rights nose and the chap on the far rights todger?


Or are you the only bloke who's been studying said todger in enough depth to compare it?

MRS BOOST EM

Original Poster:

4,100 posts

252 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
tonyhetherington said:
I edited your title and put an (18) on it to be sure. Thanks.


Sorry forgot about that (NSFW) as I am in an office on my own
Kerry

driller

8,310 posts

308 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
MRS BOOST EM said:
tonyhetherington said:
I edited your title and put an (18) on it to be sure. Thanks.


Sorry forgot about that (NSFW) as I am in an office on my own
Kerry


www.pistonheads.com/gassing/profile.asp?h=0&memberId=53833

So you're a bit obsessed with choppers then?

kerfuffle

5,253 posts

284 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
That would have been deleted immediately if that was a woman. Funny old world.


Still a funny photo though

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

274 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
kerfuffle said:
That would have been deleted immediately if that was a woman. Funny old world.

Which would also have been an overreaction, they're just genitals guys, we all have them.

MRS BOOST EM

Original Poster:

4,100 posts

252 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
driller said:
MRS BOOST EM said:
tonyhetherington said:
I edited your title and put an (18) on it to be sure. Thanks.


Sorry forgot about that (NSFW) as I am in an office on my own
Kerry


www.pistonheads.com/gassing/profile.asp?h=0&memberId=53833

So you're a bit obsessed with choppers then?



You could say that!!

Jaglover

46,818 posts

265 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
kerfuffle said:
That would have been deleted immediately if that was a woman. Funny old world.


Still a funny photo though


Discrimination

rude-boy

22,227 posts

263 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
kerfuffle said:
That would have been deleted immediately if that was a woman. Funny old world.

Which would also have been an overreaction, they're just genitals guys, we all have them.



Totally agree with you that to delete it would be an overreaction, I personally think it’s a very funny photo!

I do agree with ‘fuffle and JL though that if it had been a woman in the background lay naked and legs akimbo it would have lasted all of 2mins before being deleted as wank material.

I suppose the only way we will find out for sure though is if such a picture with a woman in the background were posted…

:cue30PHersfuriouslysearchinggoogleimages:


edit for idiot typo

>> Edited by rude-boy on Thursday 12th January 10:01

zoidberg

8,883 posts

312 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all


>> Edited by zoidberg on Thursday 12th January 10:00

driller

8,310 posts

308 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
MRS BOOST EM said:
driller said:
MRS BOOST EM said:
tonyhetherington said:
I edited your title and put an (18) on it to be sure. Thanks.


Sorry forgot about that (NSFW) as I am in an office on my own
Kerry


www.pistonheads.com/gassing/profile.asp?h=0&memberId=53833

So you're a bit obsessed with choppers then?



You could say that!!




anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
rude-boy said:
I suppose the only way we will find out for sure though is if such a picture with a woman in the background were posted


[SMUT]



sorry

>> Edited by Plotloss on Thursday 12th January 10:13

>> Edited by stovey on Thursday 12th January 10:19 to remove porn

>> Edited by stovey on Thursday 12th January 10:20

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

274 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
Perhaps slightly less subtle, I smell deletion.

NoisyGriff

579 posts

298 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
stovey said:
rude-boy said:
I suppose the only way we will find out for sure though is if such a picture with a woman in the background were posted


Internet Porn said:

[smut]



sorry



Oh dear. PistonHeads gets PC. God help us all.

The difference between photo 1 and photo 2 is that the second is porn. If you find the first pornographic, you are sick.

There's nothing funny about the second, so lets get rid. Ta.

>> Edited by NoisyGriff on Thursday 12th January 10:18

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
The second image was inline, now its linked so readers have the choice.

Whats your issue NG?