Precats are silly!
Precats are silly!
Author
Discussion

dnb

Original Poster:

3,330 posts

271 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
I mean the ones in catted exhausts, not the cars that don't have any at all...

Why have a cat before the lambda sensor? How are you supposed to tell anything about the mixture with any accuracy? Why do it this way at all, given cats don't really like being in an uncontrolled environment. It's the only engine with this configuration I've seen.

Can I just use an offset to the lambda target on a wideband positioned where the old lambda sensor was? Probably not, as cats work over a range of conditions...

Maybe I should just be rid of them? I assume it'll pass a MOT without precats if the lambda target on the wideband is 14.7:1 and the main cat is fitted...



slikk

2,135 posts

272 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
Had my pre cats removed and never experienced a problem come MOT time.

kim

mongoose

4,360 posts

284 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
Had my pre-cats out on both of the griffs i've owned.I'ts much nicer for noise,its much better for the underbonnet temps and all the things that suffer from this.There isn't one good reason to keep them imho,so BIN THEM!!.Oh and yes it'll pass the mot with ease,as long as everything is in good shape of course.

greenv8s

31,017 posts

313 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
The only reason I can see for the pre-cats is to get through the quick warmup tests during type approval.

mongoose

4,360 posts

284 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
greenv8s said:
The only reason I can see for the pre-cats is to get through the quick warmup tests during type approval.
Apparently they're there for cold idle emissions.

griffski

362 posts

277 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
What cats ???????

dnb

Original Poster:

3,330 posts

271 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
Yes, I understand the cold emissions thing - the Impreza had 2 cats for that reason too. The fundimental difference is that the lambda sensor is looking at the gas BEFORE the cats. I can't get my head around the lambdas being AFTER the cats They're just going to tell me lies!

>> Edited by dnb on Tuesday 24th January 20:09

pies

13,116 posts

285 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
You need to set them free

YamR1,V64motion

5,739 posts

253 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all





how do you go about removing them?, personally dont want any cats at all but 2 sets, no thanks

barreti

6,689 posts

266 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
I agree - Pre-Cats are Silly.
They are also noisy, thirsty, impractical and fast too but I still love my '92 4.3BV

greenv8s

31,017 posts

313 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
dnb said:
Yes, I understand the cold emissions thing - the Impreza had 2 cats for that reason too. The fundimental difference is that the lambda sensor is looking at the gas BEFORE the cats. I can't get my head around the lambdas being AFTER the cats They're just going to tell me lies!


In theory, it doesn't particularly matter where you put the lambda sensors. These 3-way cats convert hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide into water and C02, and reduce nitrous oxides to nitrogen and water. So they create oxygen, but only when there is a significant amount of nitrous oxides, which only occur when the engine is running lean. The net result is that the only time you should get oxygen in the exhaust upstream OR downstream of the cat is when the engine is running lean, or there is a misfire or incomplete combustion. If this happens it will leave unburnt oxygen and fuel in the exhaust which will probably burn in the cat, but that's a simple combustion reaction and not what the cat is for.

(Some exhaust systems inject extra air into the cats to help the HC/CO oxidation and if you have this sort then it is important to get the lambda sensors in the right place, but the TVR RV8 engines don't use this.)

If you're taking the pre-cats out, they may be loose and just fall out of the manifold when you tip it up, or it may require brute force with a chisel. If have a welding and grinding gear you might find it's quicker to cut the manifold open rather than chisel it from the end, but you should be able to get the pre-cats out without resorting to this.

dnb

Original Poster:

3,330 posts

271 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
Got welding gear - so not too much of a problem.

Remember that I'm putting wideband sensors in place of the narrow band (I'm told the Bosch LSU widebands use partial gas pressures or some such thing to tell what's going on rather than the usual way oxygen sensors work.) So having cats in the way will have an effect say during hard acceleration (or any non-ideal conditions...) when I want to know how rich the engine is actually running, not how rich it is after stuff's potentially burned in the cat. Or have I missed something here?

The grand plan is for automatic VE table optimisation in the new ECU.

mongoose

4,360 posts

284 months

Wednesday 25th January 2006
quotequote all
dnb said:
Got welding gear - so not too much of a problem.

Remember that I'm putting wideband sensors in place of the narrow band ........ So having cats in the way will have an effect say during hard acceleration
The grand plan is for automatic VE table optimisation in the new ECU.
I dont know about your ecu Dave,but on my Omex,you can choose when the sensor feedback is in use,including the throttle position.So it isn't a problem to take it out of the equation on full throttle(100%)acceleration etc.
At the mo. im running completely open loop,but thinking of going closed loop on mine(only one sensor though),once the completely de-catted system is in

red griff 500

280 posts

271 months

Wednesday 25th January 2006
quotequote all
dnb said:
So having cats in the way will have an effect say during hard acceleration (or any non-ideal conditions...) when I want to know how rich the engine is actually running, not how rich it is after stuff's potentially burned in the cat.


I believe that the lambda sensors are feedback devices which enable the ECU to modify fuel quantity to achieve complete fuel burn during steady throttle conditions. Under acceleration conditions no such modification is performed because the engine performance would be rubbish.

Your point about the fuel igniting in the pre-cat (before the lambda sensor)is interesting - that would seem to affect the sensor measurements and thus cause inaccuracies.

dnb

Original Poster:

3,330 posts

271 months

Wednesday 25th January 2006
quotequote all
I really want good closed loop lambda performance as it'll speed up mapping no end. It'll be able to quickly refine a VE table just by driving. (I don't have the luxury of a willing co-pilot to drive the laptop!)

Norbert500

86 posts

266 months

Sunday 29th January 2006
quotequote all
That post is incorrect dnb. You have the passenger footwell filled with battery, fuse board, ECU, wires, an LCD display, a PS2 keyboard, a laptop and assorted random parts. This means there is no space for you! I haven't driven MY car for ages because of your twiddling....

beano500

20,854 posts

304 months

Sunday 5th February 2006
quotequote all
Norbert500 said:
That post is incorrect dnb. You have the passenger footwell filled with battery, fuse board, ECU, wires, an LCD display, a PS2 keyboard, a laptop and assorted random parts. This means there is no space for you! I haven't driven MY car for ages because of your twiddling....