Fog Lights Craze - is it an offence?
Fog Lights Craze - is it an offence?
Author
Discussion

Don

Original Poster:

28,378 posts

304 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all
We're having a bit of a Highway Code day today so..

We all loathe this idiotic front fogs craze that's sweeping the country.

But is it an offence?

www.roads.dft.gov.uk/roadsafety/hc/08.shtml#94

This would suggest that you MUST (Highway Code code for this is LAW) switch off your front and rear foglights when "Visibility Improves". And in fog you MUST switch on your HEADLIGHTS but using Fog lights is discretionary.

www.roads.dft.gov.uk/roadsafety/hc/21.shtml

This would also suggest that this is true...and that the test for visibility is

"generally when you cannot see for more than 100 metres (328 feet). "

So I presume from this

www.dvla.gov.uk/drivers/endorsem.htm

that the offence is a MS60 (Any other offence?) which would carry points "As Appropriate"!


So...I put it to you (and our resident BiBs) that we should

"BAN THE F*****RS"

Discuss

Podie

46,646 posts

295 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all
From what I can gather, you can be pulled over for it and get a £20-£30 fine...

lotusfan

593 posts

286 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all
I got pulled on the 62 for having them on, I had just left work and saw my RHS headlight go out in a reflectin in the window of our office, it was dark and wet so i put on the front "fogs" to make sure i didn't appear as a bike (one light), when I got pulled I told the first ocifer why i'd done it and he seemed ok with that, the other one proceeded to rant at me for having them on not having listened to me. his mate then pointed out that we had already covered the reason i had them on. he said it was an offence but let me go saying i had to get the headlight fixed.

Froth

100 posts

277 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all
A friend of mine got pulled for having his front fog lights on late at night in pitch black. To his astonishment he was given a £30 fine. The office citing "misuse of optional lighting".

If you ask me it's absolute nonsense, front fog lights don't dazzle anyone, they are low down and how can they be anything wrong with having them on when it's pitch black?

Podie

46,646 posts

295 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all

Froth said:
If you ask me it's absolute nonsense, front fog lights don't dazzle anyone, they are low down and how can they be anything wrong with having them on when it's pitch black?


Pardon? Don't dazzle anyone!?! Biggest irritant on the roads...

Froth

100 posts

277 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all

Podie said:
Pardon? Don't dazzle anyone!?! Biggest irritant on the roads...


Sorry, but they don't dazzle me anyway near as much as normal headlights that aren't dipped.

Podie

46,646 posts

295 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all
Furry muff... personally I find it's the intensity of the lights that's the problem. Granted there are also a considerable number of poor adjusted dipped beams... but I rarely see people using main beams.

Found it more of an issue when in the TVR since you are lower down, but it's always bugged me. I see no reason to use fog lights in anything other than thick fog. No excuse not to use the main beam as and when required (i.e. turn it off when you see oncoming traffic).

miniman

28,962 posts

282 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all
I find fogs less irritating than badly aligned dipped beam, or muppets who don't use the beam adjust when carrying heavy loads.

Shouldn't it come down to a bit of discretion - on the M5 in good conditions then fair play, fine the buggers that leave them on. But on a dark country lane with minimal traffic, isn't there a justification for using them in terms of gaining better general visibility?

I occasionally use them in that circumstance, but always turn them off for oncoming traffic or if I'm following someone.

"If a foglight is on in the woods, but no-one is there to see it, is the driver still a numpty?"

Podie

46,646 posts

295 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all

miniman said:
"If a foglight is on in the woods, but no-one is there to see it, is the driver still a numpty?"



Don

Original Poster:

28,378 posts

304 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all

Froth said: A friend of mine got pulled for having his front fog lights on late at night in pitch black. To his astonishment he was given a £30 fine. The office citing "misuse of optional lighting".

If you ask me it's absolute nonsense, front fog lights don't dazzle anyone, they are low down and how can they be anything wrong with having them on when it's pitch black?


Whilst I'm sorry to hear your mate got fined thank you for letting me know that officers can and do haul people up for using their fog lights unnecessarily.

Brilliant.

jeremyc

26,679 posts

304 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all
Your Californian correspondant is sad to report that the craze is just as prevelant over here. Grrrrrrr.

Lock 'em all up!

madcop

6,649 posts

283 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all
Using fog lights (front and rear) when the conditions do not require them to be illuminated is an offence. It is usually dealt with vi non endorsable FPT which is fixed at £30. Offenders can be reported and summonsed to court but I would only do this if I caught someone continually abusing them after several tickets as they were obviously not taking the hint.

Cruising the town centres in your BMW on side lights and front fogs blaring with the latest Banghra hits vibrating the roadside furniture will only lead to one thing

Podie

46,646 posts

295 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all
Cheers for clearing that up Mad ... I will continue to utter obscenities under my breath at other motorists who go for the sidelights / foglights option...

mondeoman

11,430 posts

286 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all

madcop said: Using fog lights (front and rear) when the conditions do not require them to be illuminated is an offence. It is usually dealt with vi non endorsable FPT which is fixed at £30. Offenders can be reported and summonsed to court but I would only do this if I caught someone continually abusing them after several tickets as they were obviously not taking the hint.

Cruising the town centres in your BMW on side lights and front fogs blaring with the latest Banghra hits vibrating the roadside furniture will only lead to one thing



So why isn't speeding dealt with in the same way?

madcop

6,649 posts

283 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all

mondeoman said:

So why isn't speeding dealt with in the same way?



It is. Just that the fine is fixed at £60 and there happen to be 3 points attached. Persistent speeders usually end up in court.

The differnce is one of safety.
Having fog lights on is annoying but does not happen to damage property or injure people if it is inappropriately used.

Speeding however has the potential to cause an awful lot of carnage and so the penalties are more severe for misuse of the limits.

Don

Original Poster:

28,378 posts

304 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all
Thanks for that madcop. I will be sure to advise anyone who asks that a £30 ticket is their for the asking if they persist in this mildly anti-social behaviour.

mondeoman

11,430 posts

286 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all
so........
if we see someone with foglights on and its not foggy, can we take a note of their number, place, time and conditions then report them to the local plod??

If so what would happen .........

I guess I know what the answer is gonna be

Don

Original Poster:

28,378 posts

304 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all
Well. Its a craze isn't it? There would be far too many...although I'd much prefer that these people get "taxed" instead of us . The only thing that's likely to put a stop to it is Public Information Film and there's stuff a whole lot more serious to tell people about than

"Switching Your Front Fogs On When Its Not Foggy Makes You Look Like A Tosser".

I wonder if we could get Jeremy Clarkson to say the above sentence on national TV..

icamm

2,153 posts

280 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all
Going back to an earlier point. Fog lights DO dazzle. A look at the bulb ratings will explain why. Rear ones disrupt the visibility of the person behind seeing your brake lights. Front ones just dazzle oncoming drives, destroying night vision. They are therefore dangerous when visibility is normal.

This is ESPECIALLY so in wet weather when the placing of the front lamps and beam pattern causes the light to be reflected up off he road. Also, the water causes light dispersal which creates a "blanket" of light through the water droplets. The brighter the bulb the worse this effect.

If you don't believe me then go and test it. Try the test under street lighting and then try it on an unlit road.

Now I do agree that badly adjusted headlights are as bad, sometimes worse, as they usually point straight in your eyes. However, these should be checked and adjusted at every service and MOT as a minimum.

Mind you I have known cars come back from MOT/service with the fog lights switched on, unknown to the owner (and some warning lights are difficult to see) due to the mechanic who tested them being sloppy and not switching them off.

dennisthemenace

15,605 posts

288 months

Thursday 12th December 2002
quotequote all
I think front fogs should come on after the rears after all they are there for saftey reasons as you dont want to be driving in thick fog (like erlier) come up behind a car without rear fogs on but then over take the numpty mobile (when fog had cleared) only to find the front of the car is lit up like a fcuking xmas tree