£ for £, the best money I have spent on camera goods yet.
£ for £, the best money I have spent on camera goods yet.
Author
Discussion

HankScorpio

Original Poster:

715 posts

267 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
My new close up lens set. I love it.

I'd been looking at macro/micro but thought I'd give these a try and I'm extremely pleased.

After the other thread I thought I'd do some more examples.

These are all taken with the 24-120 VR lens which usually won't focus at less than about a foot.
Lens is about 4 inches from the phone with the +10 closeup, using the others (1,2,4) you can move the camera further away, they can also be combined to give in-between or higher values.

So, at 4 inches and various FL's, you get these (resized only, no cropping):

24mm:


50mm:


85mm


120mm

poah

2,142 posts

258 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
I've got some extention rings which do the same thing. I thought about the canon 500D lens but costs too much in 77mm thread size.

nice pics BTW

imperialism2024

1,596 posts

286 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
What did you use as a background?

HankScorpio

Original Poster:

715 posts

267 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
imperialism2024 said:
What did you use as a background?


That's my 2nd best purchase! Light cube (with halogen desk lamp over the top) with it's black backdrop insert.

Mr Noble

6,538 posts

263 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
Details of lightcube please Hank??

Fankoo.
G

406tm

3,636 posts

283 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
Mr Noble said:
Details of lightcube please Hank??

Fankoo.
G


Greg

I have one simular to this one but not had chance to use it yet

HTH

Dave

406TM

HankScorpio

Original Poster:

715 posts

267 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
Mr Noble said:
Details of lightcube please Hank??
Fankoo.
G


Rather than be specific:
Ebay...
Search...
Light cube (space is important or ebay will change it light tube).

There are loads available in different sizes, that one is 30cm but I'd like a bit bigger for flexibility, maybe 40 or 60. Make sure you get backdrops included as this is what makes all the difference (IMHO). The one I got also has a front sheet with a slit in it for shiney things, dead handy.

HankScorpio

Original Poster:

715 posts

267 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
just to be clear, the slit is to poke the camera through, not for the shiney things

740i

290 posts

270 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
Stunning images Hank. Contender for Feb Comp....mobile phone being just about the most powerful tool of the modern era.

John

HankScorpio

Original Poster:

715 posts

267 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
Thanks for the kind words folks but theses were just quick test to show the things off.
It was less than a minute to setup, a few shots at different fls and a quick resize. The equipment does make it very easy.

At 20 quid for the lenses and 20 for the cube, I'm sure you'll see why I reckon these were bargains and great value!

simpo two

92,891 posts

295 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
Looks good, certainly better value than a dedicated macro lens but I suppose you lose conveience and zoom.

740i said:
Stunning images Hank. Contender for Feb Comp....mobile phone being just about the most powerful tool of the modern era.

Not as powerful as my bandsaw

vipers

33,514 posts

258 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
Dont know if you can get them for digi SLR's, but when I used my Pentax SP2 (1971 vintage, and still going strong, cost then £69) SLR 35mm, I had a "reverse lens adaptor" which as is says, allowed you to put the lense on the camera in reverse, resulting in close up/macro results, with my 300 mm lense, and the adaptor, a flys wing just filled the 35 mm frame.

simpo two

92,891 posts

295 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
vipers said:
I had a "reverse lens adaptor" which as is says, allowed you to put the lense on the camera in reverse, resulting in close up/macro results, with my 300 mm lense, and the adaptor, a flys wing just filled the 35 mm frame.

Yep, the laws of physics still pertain to DSLRs (unfortunately). A reversing ring is cheap but you can kiss goodbye to AF and metering, so it's a stricty hands-on way of getting macro.

740i

290 posts

270 months

Saturday 4th February 2006
quotequote all
simpo two said:
Looks good, certainly better value than a dedicated macro lens but I suppose you lose conveience and zoom.

740i said:
Stunning images Hank. Contender for Feb Comp....mobile phone being just about the most powerful tool of the modern era.

Not as powerful as my bandsaw


Guess it's got bluetooth conectivity then

GetCarter

31,291 posts

309 months

Sunday 5th February 2006
quotequote all
740i said:
simpo two said:
Looks good, certainly better value than a dedicated macro lens but I suppose you lose conveience and zoom.

740i said:
Stunning images Hank. Contender for Feb Comp....mobile phone being just about the most powerful tool of the modern era.

Not as powerful as my bandsaw


Guess it's got bluetooth conectivity then


My chop saw has midi in - when you connect it up to a piano keyboard it sounds just like Mick Hucknall.

>> Edited by GetCarter on Sunday 5th February 08:39

HankScorpio

Original Poster:

715 posts

267 months

Sunday 5th February 2006
quotequote all
simpo two said:
Looks good, certainly better value than a dedicated macro lens but I suppose you lose conveience and zoom.


Nope, that's the point, I've retained zoom (all those above are from the same spot, 4 inches from the phone), AF (I'm hopeless at manual), metering (camera was just on "P" and left there) AND VR (how many macro lenses have that? None). No changing lenses, just a screw on at the front for when it's required.

The only downside is that distance from the subject is less flexible but not really an issue as you're pretty close with macro anyway and moving the camera to whatever is required isn't really a problem for me.

I'm more than happy -> and for my level of shooting, I can imagine they'll do just fine for the next few years. There's also no way I could justify hundreds on a dedicated macro lens now.

For the light cubes, this bloke seems to have the best range, I can't decide between the 50 and the 80.
http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Steves-Photo-Shop
(not who I got from and not on commission)

simpo two

92,891 posts

295 months

Sunday 5th February 2006
quotequote all
740i said:
simpo two said:
Not as powerful as my bandsaw


Guess it's got bluetooth conectivity then


I'll see your bluetooth and raise you one:











Now, your phone Sir?

>> Edited by simpo two on Sunday 5th February 09:56

740i

290 posts

270 months

Sunday 5th February 2006
quotequote all
Brilliant...the splitting of a cell.

simpo two

92,891 posts

295 months

Sunday 5th February 2006
quotequote all
740i said:
Brilliant...the splitting of a cell.

Eh?

theboyfold

11,471 posts

256 months

Sunday 5th February 2006
quotequote all
What macro lens is it exactly? Have you got a link to it please?