More power
More power
Author
Discussion

waynester

Original Poster:

6,522 posts

279 months

Wednesday 15th February 2006
quotequote all
Guys, whats the next progressive step, i want a bit more grunt?
I already have a SS exhaust fitted..with a sports centre silencer. I was thinking MA chip, and new cam.
Would sort of difference would this make?
Just MA chip..?
MA chip plus cam..?
Where does this take the power figures for a 400?

Thanks

(Tried the search function..which doesn't want to work on work eMac)

pwd95

8,453 posts

267 months

Wednesday 15th February 2006
quotequote all
I went from a 350i to a 400SE with a MA chip and it felt like stepping in to a rocket ship. Completely different car.
RR printout in the history shows 251 at power+

>> Edited by pwd95 on Wednesday 15th February 14:04

waynester

Original Poster:

6,522 posts

279 months

Wednesday 15th February 2006
quotequote all
Hi Wyn..did you get your 400 before the MA chip was fitted. Was it the chip that turned your car into a rocket ship?

(*How's it going re: your repairs?)

pwd95

8,453 posts

267 months

Wednesday 15th February 2006
quotequote all
The chip done before I bought it so I can't really say how much of a difference it made to the car. But it's stronger that the 350 up to 4k rpm and then it revs like a b****rd up to 6k rpm. Maaaaarrrrvelous
Things are happening with the car as we speak so can't say a lot. You guys will be the first to know and see. I've got everything crossed at the mo.

rev-erend

21,619 posts

313 months

Wednesday 15th February 2006
quotequote all
Austec smooth bore hose, 45mm alloy inlet with 72mm throttle (ACT)
and fit some replacement boshe injectors to replace your old Lucas ones.

number 7

4,113 posts

291 months

Wednesday 15th February 2006
quotequote all
Breathing seems to be the primary restriction on these engines. I can't tell if you've got hotwire or flapper. If the former, I believe that MA can burn a new program into the ECU to suit the fuelling requirements, however, you've still got that phsical restriction to the airflow, although you can partly overcome that with a larger AFM. If hotwire, things are better - very little restriction, more sophisticated metering and chips available. However, neither of these address the control of the ignition timing and advance. I believe real gains can be made by having mapable ignition. Assuming you've got hotwire and dont want to junk it, I'd say go for mapable ignition, 72mm throttle disc, 45mm shortened trumpets on a modified base and inlet manifold, followed by a BV conversion. If you've got a flapper, do what I did and junk the whole lot and go programable.

Not sure what cam was standard in the 400, but I'm running what was standard in the 4.3 which is a 214. Perfectly driveable. My revised set up (before remapping for the big trumpets/injectors/manifold is giving 300 bhp and 325 ft lbs. so you can get good gains over standard, just depends how much you want to spend. But, if you dont want to do it all at once, going fully mapable is the best option IMHO.

7.

wedg1e

27,035 posts

294 months

Wednesday 15th February 2006
quotequote all
pwd95 said:
The chip done before I bought it so I can't really say how much of a difference it made to the car. But it's stronger that the 350 up to 4k rpm and then it revs like a b****rd up to 6k rpm. Maaaaarrrrvelous
Things are happening with the car as we speak so can't say a lot. You guys will be the first to know and see. I've got everything crossed at the mo.


Only 6000? My limiter doesn't come in till 6500...

wedg1e

27,035 posts

294 months

Wednesday 15th February 2006
quotequote all
rev-erend said:
Austec smooth bore hose, 45mm alloy inlet with 72mm throttle (ACT)
and fit some replacement boshe injectors to replace your old Lucas ones.


The injectors were always Bosch, as far as I'm aware.... some just had Lucas part numbers. I have some with both.

Incidentally I'm working on a new throttle body mod: if I could only crack this alloy welding lark

adam quantrill

11,679 posts

271 months

Wednesday 15th February 2006
quotequote all
Supercharger supercharger supercharger.

Redcar

737 posts

275 months

Wednesday 15th February 2006
quotequote all
rev-erend said:
Austec smooth bore hose, 45mm alloy inlet with 72mm throttle (ACT)
and fit some replacement boshe injectors to replace your old Lucas ones.



And ACT carbon trumpets, Magnacor leads, Oh and a few £0000.00. :

cdt

537 posts

311 months

Wednesday 15th February 2006
quotequote all
number 7 said:
Assuming you've got hotwire and dont want to junk it, I'd say go for mapable ignition, 72mm throttle disc, 45mm shortened trumpets on a modified base and inlet manifold, followed by a BV conversion.


What's that lot likely to cost?

l33

3,469 posts

253 months

Wednesday 15th February 2006
quotequote all
Range Rover based 4.6 conversion could be done for a couple of grand...

Boosted Ls1

21,200 posts

289 months

Wednesday 15th February 2006
quotequote all
adam quantrill said:
Supercharger supercharger supercharger.


I'm doing it

Boosted.

waynester

Original Poster:

6,522 posts

279 months

Thursday 16th February 2006
quotequote all
Think i'll start off with cam & chip..Austec the people to talk to?

6500rpm... That just a cam swap that gives the extra rpm Ian?

number 7

4,113 posts

291 months

Thursday 16th February 2006
quotequote all
waynester said:
Think i'll start off with cam & chip..Austec the people to talk to?

6500rpm... That just a cam swap that gives the extra rpm Ian?


Do you know which cam you have already? A change could be worthwhile, especially if its worn, but IMHO you don't want to be taking a standard 400 engine over 6000 rpm on a regular basis, even if you get hi-rev tappets.

7.

number 7

4,113 posts

291 months

Thursday 16th February 2006
quotequote all
cdt said:
number 7 said:
Assuming you've got hotwire and dont want to junk it, I'd say go for mapable ignition, 72mm throttle disc, 45mm shortened trumpets on a modified base and inlet manifold, followed by a BV conversion.


What's that lot likely to cost?


Well assuming you do the removal and installation yourself, you should be able to do the big throttle, trumpets/base/manifold for c. £300-£400. Cant tell you about the ignition, but from what I've read on other fora, there are a few choices out there now, maybe low hundreds in cost. I had my BV conversion done with a lot of other stuff, rather than do it myself, but potentially this only involves relatively small parts cost, but much more in machining and labour/set-up. Should be fairly easy for someone to give you a quote for the work.

7.

waynester

Original Poster:

6,522 posts

279 months

Thursday 16th February 2006
quotequote all
I don't. I've checked through the (extensive) service history i have, but can't see anything relating to cam replacement. Assume it's still the original?
My car has done 67,000 miles, and i genuinely don't feel much difference in performance from the 350i I had before..?? Certainly not how I would describe as "wow..way faster"
As i understand it the Rover V8 doesn't really like to rev..as opposed to the AJPV8 flat plane crank engines in Cerbs etc..
60-70,000 seems to be the mileage most peeps change their cams??
Ideally i'd like a bit more mid range grunt.

wedg1e

27,035 posts

294 months

Thursday 16th February 2006
quotequote all
Well, I was sort of kidding...

My car does have a rev limiter fitted, I normally have it set at about 6000 or so mostly because although it will rev past 6000 (past 6500 in fact) there doesn't seem to be any point in doing so. Most of the 'pull' has gone by 6000 anyway, and my mechanical sympathy gland starts throbbing (along with my bleeding eardrums) if I use those sort of revs for more than a few seconds. So I don't
Incidentally my car runs standard valvegear (apart from shortened guides), hydraulic tappets and an RPI cam. How long it could maintain 6500 before the lifters pumped up I wouldn't like to guess.

My main problem last year was that the ignition trigger pickup in the dizzy was breaking down and acting as a rev limiter anyway, but at around 5300 rpm. So the car was topping out at only about 120 mph (on that private test track, obviously). I'm looking forward to seeing what it will do with the replacement pickup and my fatter injectors...

brummiewedge

5,284 posts

250 months

Thursday 16th February 2006
quotequote all
If its mid range you want, there aint no substitute for cubes boy!!! Real steel do a 4.8 stroker kit for £1500. Or scavenge the breakers for a newer generation 4.6.

number 7

4,113 posts

291 months

Thursday 16th February 2006
quotequote all
waynester said:
I don't. I've checked through the (extensive) service history i have, but can't see anything relating to cam replacement. Assume it's still the original?
My car has done 67,000 miles, and i genuinely don't feel much difference in performance from the 350i I had before..?? Certainly not how I would describe as "wow..way faster"
As i understand it the Rover V8 doesn't really like to rev..as opposed to the AJPV8 flat plane crank engines in Cerbs etc..
60-70,000 seems to be the mileage most peeps change their cams??
Ideally i'd like a bit more mid range grunt.


Waynester, if that's the original cam, then it's likely to be well past it's prime. You may well find that just replacing with new will be a revelation. It should certainly be significantly quicker than a std. 350 - you're talking about an extra 40-50 bhp after all.

7.