How about a truly tough Physics question then?
How about a truly tough Physics question then?
Author
Discussion

s2art

Original Poster:

18,942 posts

284 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2006
quotequote all
OK, given that accelerated electric charges (such as an electron) will emit electromagnetic radiation, then given the equivalence principle why dont all objects on earth emit radiation (sitting in gravitational field should be equivalent to feeling an acceleration)?

Sort that one out!

Raffles

1,931 posts

261 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2006
quotequote all
Everything does give out radiation, you, me, them, everything. That's how carbon dating etc works...

love machine

7,609 posts

266 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2006
quotequote all
Constant speed things have no energy being applied to them, hence no excess to lose, am I right?

s2art

Original Poster:

18,942 posts

284 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2006
quotequote all
love machine said:
Constant speed things have no energy being applied to them, hence no excess to lose, am I right?


Yes, but I still cant see why the equivalence principle doesnt apply. Thats whats bugging me.

love machine

7,609 posts

266 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2006
quotequote all
I think it's got something to do with plancs constant and how big stuff is and what the speeds are. I think in order to get a nice fat registerable photon out of a decellerating particle, you are dealing with something weeny going from absolute buggery to virtually all.

It's similar to asking what diffraction pattern would a human make. Due to M being huge, F would be huge as well (freq) so you'd need a fine diffraction grating to produce an interference pattern. So, in a world where plancs constant was different, bigger objects may have lower frequencies and observable photon effects due to velocity changes!