He's a very naughty boy
He's a very naughty boy
Author
Discussion

Mrs Fish

Original Poster:

30,018 posts

289 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
ananova said:
Mayor suspended over 'Nazi' jibe

London Mayor Ken Livingstone has been found guilty of bringing his office into disrepute by comparing a Jewish reporter to a Nazi concentration camp guard.

Mr Livingstone was suspended from duty for four weeks from March 1 after being found guilty of bringing his office into disrepute.

The three-man Adjudication Panel for England unanimously ruled that Mr Livingstone had been "unnecessarily insensitive and offensive" to Evening Standard reporter Oliver Finegold in February last year.

David Laverick, chairman of the disciplinary panel sitting in central London, said: "His treatment of the journalist was unnecessarily insensitive and offensive.

"He persisted with a line of comment likening the journalist's job to a concentration camp guard, despite being told that the journalist was Jewish and found it offensive to be asked if he was a German war criminal."

Mr Livingstone was not present at the hearing.

Mr Laverick said: "The reasonable onlooker would regard Mr Livingstone's reputation as being damaged as a result of the exchange. The case tribunal has also concluded that the remarks have also had the effect of damaging the reputation of his office of mayor."

Since Mr Livingstone lost the case he must pay his own costs - estimated at more than £80,000. He can appeal the decision at the High Court.

Sir Anthony Holland, chair of the Standards Board for England, said: "The public expects all elected members to conduct themselves in a manner that is beyond reproach. It is right that the facts of this case have been aired and considered in public in this way."

Commenting on the ruling Evening Standard editor Veronica Wadley said: "The Evening Standard has always believed that Mr Livingstone should apologise for his remarks. There is no question that he caused offence to many Londoners by his comments, and his stubborn refusal to say sorry aggravated the position."

TeamD

5,060 posts

263 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
[redacted]

FourWheelDrift

92,391 posts

315 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
ananova said:

Since Mr Livingstone lost the case he must pay his own costs - estimated at more than £80,000. He can appeal the decision at the High Court.


Kengestion charge increase is on the way.

Jaglover

46,845 posts

266 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
TeamD said:
Shame it wasn't permanent.




If he can get suspended for a month for a single remark. What should his punishment be trying to make Londoners lives a misery

minicity

1,009 posts

262 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
What happened to "free speech"?

scorp

8,783 posts

260 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
minicity said:
What happened to "free speech"?

Banned.

FourWheelDrift

92,391 posts

315 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
minicity said:
What happened to "free speech"?


There's free speech and then there's talking bollox, Ken is full of the latter.

TeamD

5,060 posts

263 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
Can't we arrange for him to go on holiday to Austria?

police state

4,380 posts

251 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
Mr Livingstone has said he was expressing his honestly-held political view of Associated Newspapers, but he had not meant to offend the Jewish community.

An interesting take on free-speech, particularly in light of the recent David Irving case in Austria where he essentially claimed the same defence against his charges.

Livingstone said: "he did not intend to offend the Jewish community, but was exercising his freedom of speech and has been rude to journalists for years."

It's his sanctimonious authoritarianism and pious nature that itches the most with me. They drive his thinking and his policies. Ordinarily it wouldn't bother me, but because of the power he wields, the feeling is inescapable.



judas

6,249 posts

290 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
BBC News said:
But Deputy Mayor Nicky Gavron said the incident had been "blown out fo all proportion" and described the decision as absurd.

Now, why don't they apply that type of thinking to other areas, like Kengestion charge late payment fines? See DeR's post yesterday for contrast.

BBC News also said:
She went on: "An elected Mayor should only be removed by the law or by the electorate. Not by an unelected body."

Funny how opinions suddenly change when they fall victim to the whims of unelected, unaccountable bodies... Live by the quango, die by the quango.

Jamassey

584 posts

271 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
minicity said:
What happened to "free speech"?


There's free speech and then there's talking bollox, Ken is full of the latter.


Couldn't agree more.

Graham

16,381 posts

315 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
Much as I dont like the bloke.... I dont think the judgement is fair.

scorp

8,783 posts

260 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
As much as i dislike this guy, i fail to see what the problem is, his observation was maybe a little tasteless but i can't see how anyone would find it that offensive.

On the other hand..
judas said:
Funny how opinions suddenly change when they fall victim to the whims of unelected, unaccountable bodies... Live by the quango, die by the quango.

minicity

1,009 posts

262 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
Perhaps - but in this instance I am on his side. If journos hassle people "because its their job" they should take whatever they get.

percy flage

1,770 posts

253 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
Why has he not resigned? Surely a resignation would have followed from anyone found guilty of this offence in any other political office?

diddyman

3,646 posts

272 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
percy flage said:
Why has he not resigned? Surely a resignation would have followed from anyone found guilty of this offence in any other political office?

Quite right. Then he could get a job with the EU.

grumbledoak

32,571 posts

264 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
Not funny at all, whether you like him or not.

Who, exactly, are the "Standards Board for England" ?
Who elected them ? Who are they accountable to ?
Why do their (over) sensitivities not apply to Blair et al ?

Journalists are seldom saints, and a justification of
"Just doing my job" can be used by anyone. We don't
accept it from soldiers who committed atrocities, even
if they did it on pain of death...


Worrying judgement.



>> Ed 'cos I can't splle, innit


>> Edited by grumbledoak on Friday 24th February 14:16

ATG

23,858 posts

303 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
He's appealing (as in he is appealing this decision ... he's certainly unappealing in every other way). And good luck to him. The comment was in poor taste. So what?

The allegation is that he has brough the office of Mayor of London into disrepute. That is patent bollox. Does this board of imbeciles really think that people believe Livingstone was speaking in his capacity as mayor when he compared this bloke to a nazi prison guard? Obviously not. So how is it bringing the office of mayor into disrepute. If he brings himself into disrepute, that is his own problem. It is entirely different from degrading the position of Mayor.

xm5er

5,094 posts

279 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
I dont understand why he called him a concentration camp guard anyway, I wasn't aware that they were know for following people around and asking irritating questions, more for pointing guns and shouting at people.

Is that really the best insult he could come up with on the spare of the moment?

roy c

4,217 posts

315 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
So what should he be suspended from?

My vote is he gets suspended from the Wobbly (Millennium) Bridge.