Bad news for blondes
Author
Discussion

janszott

Original Poster:

218 posts

288 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Maybe Darwin was right.....
Click

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

286 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Blondes 'to die out in 200 years'

Bloody hell, bet they'll look hideous by then....

M@H

11,298 posts

303 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Gazboy said:
They've been saying similar things about red heads for ages too....


Noooooooooooooo

M@H

11,298 posts

303 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Phew.. !

FourWheelDrift

92,395 posts

315 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
BBC said:

Bottle-blondes like Ann Widdecombe may be to blame



To help preserve natural blondes I call for a cull, starting with this one.

timmy30

9,325 posts

258 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Luckily their close cousin the 'cockpit' blonde will not die out anytime soon.

nevpugh308

4,454 posts

300 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Article said:
The researchers also believe that so-called bottle blondes may be to blame for the demise of their natural rivals.

They suggest that dyed-blondes are more attractive to men who choose them as partners over true blondes.

Yeah, right, coz every time I turn round I can't help tripping over 100's of unmarried natural blondes !!

vixpy1

42,699 posts

295 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
I won't be around in 200 years.. so it does'nt matter

havoc

33,505 posts

266 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Gazboy said:
M@H said:
Gazboy said:
They've been saying similar things about red heads for ages too....


Noooooooooooooo


No need to worry mate, we'd have shuffled our last knuckles long before Nicole Kidman is a distant memory...


Not quite the words I'd use, but the sentiment is there...

Jaglover

46,845 posts

266 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Ahh well I prefer brunettes anyway.

lexie

349 posts

264 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Is there any evolutionary advantage for pink and blonde? Not natural though, I think, to be honest I can't really remember what colour it used to be...

vixpy1

42,699 posts

295 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
lexie said:
Is there any evolutionary advantage for pink and blonde?


yes, they can't work out how to open a pack of 3

timmy30

9,325 posts

258 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
lexie said:
Is there any evolutionary advantage for pink and blonde? Not natural though, I think, to be honest I can't really remember what colour it used to be...


Apparently blondes hair is more dense, presumeably this leant an advantage in cold climates hence the mutation orginally became established in Northern Europe.

Big_M

5,602 posts

294 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
nevpugh308 said:

Yeah, right, coz every time I turn round I can't help tripping over 100's of unmarried natural blondes !!

*resists temptation to stick out foot next time nevpugh308 walks past*



100% natural blonde (unmarried)

rich 36

13,739 posts

297 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
'Toni & guy's


Blonde ambition crew,

look disappointment in the face,



R988

7,501 posts

260 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Gazboy said:
FourWheelDrift said:
BBC said:

Bottle-blondes like Ann Widdecombe may be to blame



To help preserve natural blondes I call for a cull, starting with this one.



Of all the bottle blondes to use as an example, why did they choose one that has absolutely zero sex appeal?


Well it is the BBC, it's run by poofs isn't it?

Anyway with genetic engineering coming along and the demand for blondes I say it's probably a load of tosh.

lexie

349 posts

264 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Gazboy said:
lexie said:
Is there any evolutionary advantage for pink and blonde? Not natural though, I think, to be honest I can't really remember what colour it used to be...


There was.

Back in the day before Tesco's when the fella's went out to get some fast food (deer) or a decent steak (mammoth) women outnumbered men by quite a margin due to all the men getting killed while out hunting.

An mutation of sorts caused a few European people to have blonde hair. Ugg saw blonde strutting her funky stuff and thought "Ding Dong! me wants plenty of that!" and so he got his end away with her, not the dull brunette that he never saw standing next to blondielocks...


But that doesn't explain the evolutionary benefits of pink hair, if there are any at all, for there may be none since it is quite expensive to maintain!

nevpugh308

4,454 posts

300 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Big_M said:
nevpugh308 said:

Yeah, right, coz every time I turn round I can't help tripping over 100's of unmarried natural blondes !!

*resists temptation to stick out foot next time nevpugh308 walks past*



100% natural blonde (unmarried)


Ahhh, well hur-loow ! :winks:

(and an Essex girl to boot, I see )

lexie

349 posts

264 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Gazboy said:
Who's got pink hair?

Me, but it's faded now, was beetroory pink stripes now it's kinda paleness. Actually there's a remarkable number of people with pink hair around.

lexie

349 posts

264 months

Thursday 2nd March 2006
quotequote all
Gazboy said:
lexie said:
Gazboy said:
Who's got pink hair?

Me, but it's faded now, was beetrooty pink stripes now it's kinda paleness. Actually there's a remarkable number of people with pink hair around.


You were born with pink hair?


No, that would be silly, but because I choose to have pink and blonde (and boring brown) hair does that give me an evolutionary advantage over having boring brown hair?