How much HP does....
Author
Discussion

Moose.

Original Poster:

5,345 posts

272 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
.... a horse have? Seriously, I recon it's much more than just 1HP for an average horse. And those Shire horses can pull a pretty hefty carriage which would require much more than a 1HP engine. Where on earth did this silly unit of power come from any way?

yes it's Friday and I'm bored!

edit: spelling

>> Edited by Moose. on Friday 3rd March 13:06

alexkp

16,484 posts

275 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
A horse has much more than 1hp in engine terms IIRC.

Nick P

29,977 posts

282 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
if so, how many hp does a pony have?

blindswelledrat

25,257 posts

263 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
... and much more importantly how many HP do 7 fish,2 badgers and a bag of weasels have?
Will that HP be reduced by the rope I intend to tie them to a sledge with?

Davel

8,982 posts

289 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
Is this HP Fruity or Original?

ripton

429 posts

263 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
are we talking HP at the hoof or harness?

timmy30

9,325 posts

258 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
I think an average sized dog had 2.5hp, if that's any help.

Moose.

Original Poster:

5,345 posts

272 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
ripton said:
are we talking HP at the hoof or harness?
:scrachchin: I would have thought transmission losses would be pretty much zero, so either really

jamieboy

5,932 posts

260 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
Davel said:
Is this HP Fruity or Original?
You mean "Is this Fruity or Burny?"

Always was burny sauce, always will be. To me, anyway.

Nick P

29,977 posts

282 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
but isn't a horse classed as 4wd so the transmission losses are greater?

jeremyc

28,382 posts

315 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
Nick P said:
but isn't a horse classed as 4wd so the transmission losses are greater?
But it will vary depending upon whether you measure the losses at a trot, canter or gallop.

Nick P

29,977 posts

282 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
jeremyc said:
Nick P said:
but isn't a horse classed as 4wd so the transmission losses are greater?
But it will vary depending upon whether you measure the losses at a trot, canter or gallop.


and a horse cannot torque

Jon C

3,214 posts

278 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
Nick P said:
jeremyc said:
Nick P said:
but isn't a horse classed as 4wd so the transmission losses are greater?
But it will vary depending upon whether you measure the losses at a trot, canter or gallop.


and a horse cannot torque


Unless of course that particular horse is the Famous Mr Ed

Nick P

29,977 posts

282 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
Jon C said:
Nick P said:
jeremyc said:
Nick P said:
but isn't a horse classed as 4wd so the transmission losses are greater?
But it will vary depending upon whether you measure the losses at a trot, canter or gallop.


and a horse cannot torque


Unless of course that particular horse is the Famous Mr Ed


<winces at being outsmarted>

rodney59

424 posts

279 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
Take a look at website: www.web-cars.com/math/horsepower.html

Seems we humans have 0.1 hp

Nick P

29,977 posts

282 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
rodney59 said:
Take a look at website: www.web-cars.com/math/horsepower.html

Seems we humans have 0.1 hp


thats can't be correct, i bang away like a toilet door in the wind and use up loads of Horsepower?


wakes up to realise sexual prowess has all been a dream

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

292 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
But is this on a conveyor belt heading on the opposite direction?

Fatboy

8,270 posts

303 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
blindswelledrat said:
... and much more importantly how many HP do 7 fish,2 badgers and a bag of weasels have?
Will that HP be reduced by the rope I intend to tie them to a sledge with?

Depends on whether the weasels are in the bag (power reduction) or out of the bag, hooked up in a parallel mammalian array.

Corpulent Tosser

5,468 posts

276 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all

You can blame James Watt for the unit horse power

He was trying to sell his steam engines and observed horses at work on mines.
He concluded that a horse could lift 550 pounds at the rate of one foot per second. In other words, it could lift 33,000 pounds one foot per minute. And that's the figure we use today: one unit of horsepower equals 33,000 foot-pounds per minute.

The horses that worked the mines were not the biggest or possibly the healthiest horses, but then he wanted to be able to tell potential buyers that his engine could do the work of X number of horses.


Nick P

29,977 posts

282 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
Corpulent Tosser said:

You can blame James Watt for the unit horse power

He was trying to sell his steam engines and observed horses at work on mines.
He concluded that a horse could lift 550 pounds at the rate of one foot per second. In other words, it could lift 33,000 pounds one foot per minute. And that's the figure we use today: one unit of horsepower equals 33,000 foot-pounds per minute.

The horses that worked the mines were not the biggest or possibly the healthiest horses, but then he wanted to be able to tell potential buyers that his engine could do the work of X number of horses.




cool...thats cleared that up then...


jealous at not knowing that info