Dealers
Author
Discussion

Mon Ami Mate

Original Poster:

6,589 posts

291 months

Sunday 5th March 2006
quotequote all
Just had a bit of a row with a local Kawasaki dealer, so prepare to read a rant. Haven't ridden my ZZR1200 since October because I broke my leg. Paid a deposit for a new ZZR1400 in November and was going to chop the 1200 in on it. Was told it would be here in Feb. This was pushed to March, then April, now May, so I took my deposit back and decided to use the 1200 for the meantime. Came to start the 1200 last week - unsurprisingly the battery was flat and the brakes slightly bound. For some reason the brand new front tyre was also losing pressure. Oh, and it was overdue for its first MOT. Arranged for the dealer to come and collect the bike, to MOT it and put everything right. Just went to collect the bike, handed over £150, only to find that both the battery and front tyre were equally flat, and that the rear brake remained firmly bound.

The flunky behind the desk got a bit upset when I lifted the seat, pulled out the battery and found that it patently wasn't a new one. He got even more upset when I advised the people in the queue behind me that they should check the standard of the work very carefully before handing over their cash. He then asked me to leave when I told him that I'd rather eat my own dog than buy a new bike from him.

Bastards.

itsadeal

707 posts

241 months

Sunday 5th March 2006
quotequote all
Sue them, its blantant fraud and deception.

Vitesse39

731 posts

271 months

Monday 6th March 2006
quotequote all

A little word in the ear of trading standards aswell me thinks.

wolf1

3,091 posts

273 months

Monday 6th March 2006
quotequote all
Check the invoice first before attempting anything else. You may well have only paid for the collection and MOTing of your bike. However if it has the other items/tasks listed then a stern word with the owner should have the situation rectified without it dragging out through TS or the courts.

Rawwr

22,722 posts

257 months

Monday 6th March 2006
quotequote all
Pah, I'm just preparing to sue a dealer in Letchworth (whose name I probably shouldn't mention but they're quite a big one).

itsadeal

707 posts

241 months

Monday 6th March 2006
quotequote all
Vitesse is right try the trading standards, however so was wolf! just check what you have been invoiced for, first?

james_j

3,996 posts

278 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
This sort of thing makes you wonder whether they even put the correct oil in your bike and hold back on other things you can't check too easily.

tone

297 posts

306 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
wolf1 said:
Check the invoice first before attempting anything else. You may well have only paid for the collection and MOTing of your bike. However if it has the other items/tasks listed then a stern word with the owner should have the situation rectified without it dragging out through TS or the courts.


I agrre with the principal of checking before exploding but they can't have even MOT'd it in that condition.

rsvmilly

11,288 posts

264 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
Pah, I'm just preparing to sue a dealer in Letchworth (whose name I probably shouldn't mention but they're quite a big one).
I wonder who that could be...

What for?

treehack

997 posts

262 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
rsvmilly said:
Rawwr said:
Pah, I'm just preparing to sue a dealer in Letchworth (whose name I probably shouldn't mention but they're quite a big one).
I wonder who that could be...

What for?


iwas wondering exactly the same thing

Rawwr

22,722 posts

257 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
I'll tell you more on Friday 17th after 12pm.

rsvmilly

11,288 posts

264 months

Wednesday 8th March 2006
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
I'll tell you more on Friday 17th after 12pm.
Details provided in a plain brown envelope, which self destructs?

morrisman

264 posts

241 months

Saturday 11th March 2006
quotequote all
Mon Ami Mate said:
Just had a bit of a row with a local Kawasaki dealer, so prepare to read a rant. Haven't ridden my ZZR1200 since October because I broke my leg. Paid a deposit for a new ZZR1400 in November and was going to chop the 1200 in on it. Was told it would be here in Feb. This was pushed to March, then April, now May, so I took my deposit back and decided to use the 1200 for the meantime. Came to start the 1200 last week - unsurprisingly the battery was flat and the brakes slightly bound. For some reason the brand new front tyre was also losing pressure. Oh, and it was overdue for its first MOT. Arranged for the dealer to come and collect the bike, to MOT it and put everything right. Just went to collect the bike, handed over £150, only to find that both the battery and front tyre were equally flat, and that the rear brake remained firmly bound.

The flunky behind the desk got a bit upset when I lifted the seat, pulled out the battery and found that it patently wasn't a new one. He got even more upset when I advised the people in the queue behind me that they should check the standard of the work very carefully before handing over their cash. He then asked me to leave when I told him that I'd rather eat my own dog than buy a new bike from him.

Bastards.

Surely you weren't expected to collect a bike with a flat tyre and flat battery? I think something is amiss here, something has not been told. When you found the bike was still in the condition you took it in as, you must have asked to see the mechanic and spoken about what was happening, asked why the tyre was flat etc etc, not just argued with some bozo on the front desk??

JamieBeeston

9,294 posts

288 months

Sunday 12th March 2006
quotequote all
Hmm

are you sure you've been invoiced for it all?

I had the TL1000R collected recently for Flat battery / MOT and the Collection / Drop off cost alone was £160, the bill (inc £110 for a new rear tyre) was just over £500..

From the sounds of it, you've just been billed for the collect / delivery and MOT..

but I dont see how it could pass an MOT with a flat battery.. unless it had enough power to do the indicators i suppose.

Mon Ami Mate

Original Poster:

6,589 posts

291 months

Sunday 12th March 2006
quotequote all
What has clearly happened is that the dealer has pumped up the tyre and charged the battery, but charged me for a new valve and new battery. I had already tried this myself - the battery wouldn't hold a charge for more than a couple of days and the tyre would go gradually flat. They probably whacked the rear caliper with a rubber hammer.

dern

14,055 posts

302 months

Sunday 12th March 2006
quotequote all
JamieBeeston said:
but I dont see how it could pass an MOT with a flat battery.. unless it had enough power to do the indicators i suppose.
It couldn't as it wouldn't be able to start which is a fail.

appledell

28 posts

252 months

Tuesday 14th March 2006
quotequote all
how could it have passed an MOT with the rear brake seized? Mot dept would like to know the name of the testing station.

treehack

997 posts

262 months

Sunday 19th March 2006
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
I'll tell you more on Friday 17th after 12pm.


what happened then?

waynester

6,495 posts

273 months

Tuesday 21st March 2006
quotequote all
treehack said:
Rawwr said:
I'll tell you more on Friday 17th after 12pm.


what happened then?


I'm in Stevenage so frequent this dealer fairly regularly....what happened?